• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Where are your accusers?

morningstar2651

Senior Veteran
Dec 6, 2004
14,557
2,591
40
Arizona
✟74,149.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
A post in the For New Christians section opened my eyes to something I overlooked in the following story...


Now, from 8:3, we see that she was caught in adultery, which means the Pharisees would apply the following law:

However, if this really were the case, then the Pharisees would have brought two people to Jesus instead of one -- where is the man she was caught with?

If she wasn't caught, then the only law the Pharisees could have applied would have been:

In which case, the only person who could rightly accuse her would be her husband, but the husband is nowhere to be found. Where is her husband?

In either scenario, someone is missing:
Where is the man she commited adultery with?
Where is her husband?
 

Emmy

Senior Veteran
Feb 15, 2004
10,200
940
✟66,005.00
Faith
Salvation Army
Dear morningstar2651. If I have overlooked something in mymessage, forgive me, but I cannot see a partner to the woman. Since Jesus says to the woman: " Go now and leave your life of sin," I presume she was a prostitute, and the partner in the crime had disappeared. I believe the Bible was pointing out, that the woman was a sinner, but she was not a lost sinner. Leave the life of sin, is repenting, and Jesus promised us that God will forgive all, who repent, ask forgiveness and sincerely try and change. Jesus could have said more to the caught woman, but I believe His presence and forgiveness, changed the woman. I say this humbly and with love, morningstar. Greetings from Emmy, sister in Christ.
 
Upvote 0

morningstar2651

Senior Veteran
Dec 6, 2004
14,557
2,591
40
Arizona
✟74,149.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
The first passage you referenced doesn't really say where the husband or the alduterer is, which indicates to me that isn't the point of the passage.
I understand the message of the passage, but it takes on an extra layer of meaning now that I noticed the lack of the husband and the lack of the adulterer.

Raising more questions - Why did the Pharisees do as Jesus commanded? They wanted him to stone her, but they refused to do it themselves.

Why didn't the Pharisees stone the woman?

It seems that she may have been innocent of the crime she was accused of, and the Pharisees knew she was innocent.

Looking through some commentaries, it also appears that perhaps the Pharisees overlooked the man's crime, explaining his absense.
http://www.blueletterbible.org/cgi-...html#ch8&.Chuck&Smith&Select.x=13&Select.y=13

Looks like one possible reason is that it would be illegal for them to do so by Roman law.

This second commentary has a lot of interesting ideas in it:
http://www.blueletterbible.org/cgi-....html#0&*David+Guzik&&Select.x=23&Select.y=20
 
Upvote 0

Bryan519

Newbie
Jul 10, 2008
62
5
58
Austin, Texas
✟22,746.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
The problem here is that you are assuming that because the husband and the adulterer were not mentioned in this passage that they were not present. the passage neither confirms or refutes that assumption.
 
Upvote 0

Zunalter

Regular Member
Aug 5, 2004
151
18
ID
✟15,469.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Politics
US-Others
From what I understand, one of the main points of this scripture is that they didn't bring the man she had supposedly slept with to Jesus as well, showing that they weren't interested in following the Law but rather in attempting to trap Jesus:

If Jesus said "Stone her" he would be guilty of breaking Roman law, since the death penalty was only to be administered with approval from the Romans. But, if he said "Let her be" the Jews would have accused him of breaking Jewish Law. So, as usual, Jesus did what he does best: showed their hypocrisy.

The fact that nobody threw a stone and instead walked off did not signify that these people recognized that they were sinful, but simply that Jesus had found a way out of their trap and thus they lost interest. That is another pointer to the fact that they weren't interested in keeping the Law so much as trapping Jesus.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
M

MrShine

Guest
I would agree with the above answer as well as the others.

The similarity to this story is almost like the of the Story of The good Samaritin-Both times they were trying to entrap Jesus and He came back with loving answers away from the Law. They didn't comprehend Grace yet as they were still under Law.

The story of the aldulteress has a couple of points-One is that everyone has sinned. That is why all of the crowd ended up walking off after He asked, Who ever has not sinned, cast the first stone. His wise answer caused them to leave one by one; Oldest first (Perhaps the oldest that left were the biggest pharasees and realized they can't keep the Law ).

She was still under Law-But Jesus gave her the instruction to "sin no more," She left which I would take as she believed He was more then just A man- Who the other guilty party was is not important in this lesson.
Perhaps there were many others before this incident earlier in her life. She as everyone else were all sinners regardless as no one could keep the law in it's entirety. Thus is The whole Gospel of Jesus Christ.

Now the Story of the Good Samartin is similiar in that they were trying to trap Jesus again and a man of law thought he could trick Him- Again, there is a huge lesson in this story as some may ask "Who was the one that was robbed and beaten?" It is not important who he was but the lesson is that it does not matter who he was but focused on the one who had compassion and the two who passed Him by. Two were hypocrites and passed him by- A Samaratin (Despised by the Jews) was the one who showed compassion. Thus; Love Thy Neighbour.

I hope this help along with the others answers
 
Upvote 0

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,976
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟1,005,212.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Adam Clarke offers some interesting thoughts.

Adultery and fornication were widespread in Jesus day. The Romans forbid the death penalty without State consent. There was a permissive attitude toward such offences, and the "waters of jealousy" ritual had fallen into disuse. Much of the Law had been replaced by the "traditions" that had supplanted it.

The Pharisees wanted to trap Jesus by trickery. If he took the bait and condemned the woman he would be no different than them and would be a teacher of the law. And he would be in trouble with the Romans as well for inciting an illegal act of capital punishment.

Clarke also doubts that the offence even rose to the level of stoning under the law. That she was caught "in the act of adultery" says nothing of the involvement of each participant. If she was a prostitute she was guilty of "whoredom" and not adultery, in the strict sense. If so it was a married man that committed adultery against his wife by sleeping with a her, a prostitute. This was very common in that day.

Clarke also posits that Jesus was indeed rehearsing the sins of those Pharisees, writing them in the dust, which prompted the eldest of them to leave the scene first, perhaps having a long list of similiar offences.

owg
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0