Before entering the main body of my response, I again remind the respondent that my interest has only been in the question of how any person's religious liberty is impinged by the civil liberties of a different person. That is "how does the civil rights of Person B infringe the religious freedom of Person A?" It is not clear that the question is understood.
And I am telling you it is. One standard for yourself, and another for me. It is exactly about this. Who's stubborn here?
It's not about different standards for different persons in this conversation, it is about the topic of the interaction.
I have no power here. I can only choose to respond or not respond to a post, even one directed at me. It is the same power you have in this conversation -- stay or leave. Read, or ignore.
Now on to some tenants of your beliefs. (The ones that don't interest me, because they don't impact the topic of the original inquiry about rights.) Let's see what you wrote...
What scripture and God says to me is all about this.
Why are you dictating what it si about "for me"
Here is a parents commandment........ This is what we are to do........
Pr 22:6
Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it.
Col 3:20
Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord.
Eph 6:1 ¶
Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right.
2 Honour thy father and mother; (which is
the first commandment with promise
3 That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long on the earth.
And I've never that you aren't free to believe any of this or raise children in that fashion.
What matters is what my religion says to me.
To the extent that it motivates you, but the line you are responding to is about the alleged conflict of rights, not the details of belief.
But you say that is not the/an issue? WOW! Now I am a stubborn bigot. I am just plain bad aren't I?
Are you trying to give the most unfavorable reading of my statements? As I said in my previous message (to which this line is a reply) bigotry is not the issue, either way. Again it is the alleged conflict of rights.
I teach my kids and train them up in the Lord, as I am commanded. They are commanded to obey.
But I send them to school and What have we seen happening? No gender other than that what you feel, all kinds of genders. Shower with whomever wants to shower there, gender does not really exist other than the mind. Gay marriage and relations are not sin, that's bigotry. On and on. Does not matter what my religion dictates. I am cancelled because you say so, and You will form my childrens mind and ethics.
I have no interest in, nor could I, "cancel you". Or telling you how to practice your faith. You have your opinions, other have theirs and you each have opinions of the other from their opinions. No ones freedoms are impinged (religious or otherwise) by having those opinions.
That is all i am seeing here. that is the issue here, thats the bottom line.
How we are to respond in civil society.
That's a good question. How should we respond in civil society. How can we deal with the civil rights of others even if we disagree with them?
You don't have a clue what religious rights you desire to deny me.
You fail to document religious rights that are being denied or would be denied.
You have already said, you don't care what my scripture says. Who is the bigot?
I don't care what anyone's scripture says. That's not about bigotry, I just find religion and religious texts exceedingly boring. Never have been interested in such things. I'm not interested in the writings of the Bronte sisters or rodeos either.