Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Why doesn't it have truth and weight?
The nested hierarchy demonstrates that Evolution can produce a leg.
Why doesn't it have truth and weight?
The nested hierarchy demonstrates that Evolution can produce a leg.
"May very well exist"? You mean scientist have not found any? Isn't that strange how supposedly these "transitional fossils" are separated by millions of years? Wouldn't there be remains of literally millions of these ancestors or descendants between the transitional fossils showing the gradual changes from one to another? How would science explain this?
How about this?
What if God only created a few animals like a canine, a feline, a serpent, an equestrian, a pachyderm, ect... and then through selective breeding or natural selection the number of subspecies multuplied? Kinda like how we got so many different dog breeds.
Well, when we look at the number of new dog breeds in the last 100 years...That's actually what many creationists believe in order to explain the problem of too many species to fit on the ark. A sort of hyper-evolution, in a condensed amount of time.
The irony. It burns.Once again another atheist blabber mouth with nothing to say. Hey, but thanks for the reply.
You might want to read up on fossilization before repeating the "millions of fossils" PRATT."May very well exist"? You mean scientist have not found any? Isn't that strange how supposedly these "transitional fossils" are separated by millions of years? Wouldn't there be remains of literally millions of these ancestors or descendants between the transitional fossils showing the gradual changes from one to another? How would science explain this?
Or understand it.Clearly you didn't read the entire opening post...
Monotremes are a perfect example of transitional forms. They have fur and rudimentary mammary glands, but possess a cloaca and lay eggs.How about this?
Artificial selection and cross-breading is the opposite of how natural selection works.Well, when we look at the number of new dog breeds in the last 100 years...
How about this?
What if God only created a few animals like a canine, a feline, a serpent, an equestrian, a pachyderm, ect... and then through selective breeding or natural selection the number of subspecies multuplied? Kinda like how we got so many different dog breeds.
Those are transitional in exactly the same way we are discussing. That you haven't figured this out yet says a lot. You never assume nor conclude common ancestry or evolution simply because there are transitional fossils. It is the PATTERN of transitional fossils that evidences evolution. If you included other mixtures of utensil features you would find that they don't form a nested hierarchy. That is what allows you to say that utensils did not evolve through common ancestry. However, transitional fossils of past species DO form a nested hierarchy, and it is that pattern which evidences common ancestry and evolution.
It's already been explained to you....COMMON CREATOR.
We observe that created things don't form nested hierarchies. So how is a nested hierarchy explained by a creator?
How many different creators are involved with what you have observed?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?