• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Oct 11, 2008
1,793
275
42
-
✟9,187.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
trea·son

   /ˈtri zən/ Show Spelled[tree-zuh n] Show IPA
noun 1.The offense of acting to overthrow one's government or to harm or kill its sovereign.
2. A violation of allegiance to one's sovereign or to one's state.
3.The betrayal of a trust or confidence; breach of faith; treachery.

How often do we hear of politicians and/or media figures that would/could be tried for treason but it goes unnoticed or not mentioned ?
 
Oct 11, 2008
1,793
275
42
-
✟9,187.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I see nothing to be gained in lowering the bar of treason to such low levels. The witch hunts of McCarthyism should not be carried out again with the idea that if you don't follow a particular ideology you are an enemy of the state.

If you do something against the fundamentals of the common good and use taxpayer dollars with wreckless abondon then you should have to answer for that. Taxpayer money should be treated with a sacred trust it is NOT a piggybank for those in power to raid and use for whatever pet project they seem fit to embark on. Government should enhance our freedoms NOT take them away.
 
Upvote 0

Touma

Well-Known Member
Feb 19, 2007
7,201
773
38
Virginia
✟34,033.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others


US Constitution, Article III Section 3

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

And 18 U.S.C. § 2381: Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

I'll stick with those definitions.
 
Upvote 0

Touma

Well-Known Member
Feb 19, 2007
7,201
773
38
Virginia
✟34,033.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Government should enhance our freedoms NOT take them away.

Goverment has only a role in protecting your freedoms. Not enhancing or taking away. Just protecting


And how does spending tax money on roads, bridges, schools, community centers, the military, social security, etc take away from your freedom? Which specific constitutional right does the government trounce when they spend tax money?
 
Upvote 0

Belk

Senior Member
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2005
30,692
15,144
Seattle
✟1,171,712.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married


Then make them answer for it by using the methods in place of voting them out. But electing people and then trying to prosecute them because you do not like the way they run things is immoral and unethical. Especially by using laws that carry the death penalty to try to cow people into following the path you have decided is best. Tyranny of the masses is still tyranny.
 
Upvote 0

Rion

Annuit Cœptis
Site Supporter
Oct 26, 2006
21,869
6,275
Nebraska
✟419,198.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single

Not sure if you were responding to me or not, but knowingly providing weapons to foreign bationals who you know will likely use those weapons against American citizens would fall under giving aid to the enemy.
 
Upvote 0
Oct 11, 2008
1,793
275
42
-
✟9,187.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Well if government wants to keep us all safe then we should all be locked up and the key thrown away so nothing harms us and we are all SAFE then right ?

Certain things enhance our freedoms and others take freedom away, There is a balance that should be the goal our FREEDOMS should be enhanced by government we should NOT be a prisoner to government.
 
Upvote 0

tulc

loves "SO'S YER MOM!! posts!
May 18, 2002
49,401
18,804
69
✟279,100.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Not sure if you were responding to me or not, but knowingly providing weapons to foreign bationals who you know will likely use those weapons against American citizens would fall under giving aid to the enemy.

I also think Ron Reagan should be put on trial for treason but I don't see it happening any time soon.
tulc(likes when he can agree with others)
 
Upvote 0

Touma

Well-Known Member
Feb 19, 2007
7,201
773
38
Virginia
✟34,033.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others


You didn't asnwer the question.
 
Upvote 0

Touma

Well-Known Member
Feb 19, 2007
7,201
773
38
Virginia
✟34,033.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Not sure if you were responding to me or not, but knowingly providing weapons to foreign bationals who you know will likely use those weapons against American citizens would fall under giving aid to the enemy.

I could be persuaded to agree with you. However, legally they have the argument that intent was not to arm the drug cartels (whom I suspect you are talking about) to fight against the United States gov't, but to track how they get weapons from the US and then find a way to stop that flow, in an attempt to prevent those cartels from doing harm to our country or fellow citizens. Of course, the idea sounds nice of paper, but they performed it in such an idiotic way. That being said, I am not sure that being an idiot is treason. Perhaps if they had clear intent on aiding the enemy against the United States gov't...then Treason could be charged. Or, because the requirements for treason specify war has be in place between the United States and the group being aided or armed, it is unlikely treason will be charged against these people. Congress has not, to the best of my knowledge, formally declared war on Mexican Drug Cartels or the country of Mexico.

However, the lack of punishment for those gunrunning programs might change due to a proposed bill in the House, from Charlie Dent of PA. He proposes adding language that aiding groups who engage in open hostilities (notice the lack of formal declaration of war) can 1) be stripped of citizenship, which leads to 2) indefinite military detention under NDAA.

Again, it would be a matter of proving that the intent was to aid an enemy of the united states, and not simply a new method of trying to protect it in a roundabout way.
 
Upvote 0

Acebopata

The red wasp of the salted
Jan 11, 2012
71
1
The land of mass construction.
✟22,698.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I believe Treason is when the government does something they are not supposed to without care about the consequences. The reason I beleive this is a simple equations, one that say's

"Once you ignore the laws of what the government can not do, then that same government shall overt undue injustices over the populace, thus leading into treason by any definition."

The interpretation of the equation is simple. If the government constantly ignores it's boundaries, then the Government will commit undue iniquities upon the populace.
 
Upvote 0

Ishraqiyun

Fanning the Divine Spark
Mar 22, 2011
4,882
169
Montsalvat
✟28,535.00
Faith
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I never gave my allegiance to a sovereign, or to a state, or to a country to begin with. Some folks think you "owe" allegiance to a state because you happened to be born within what it considers to be it's jurisdiction. I disagree. It seems like a statist concept to me.
 
Upvote 0

Incariol

Newbie
Apr 22, 2011
5,710
251
✟7,523.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Not sure if you were responding to me or not, but knowingly providing weapons to foreign bationals who you know will likely use those weapons against American citizens would fall under giving aid to the enemy.

Foreigners aren't enemies by default. Nice try.
 
Upvote 0