Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Quit confusing adaptation as evolution. We agree a billion black rabbits placed close to the north pole if they survive will in time become white rabbits. Part of what God put in the DNA to enable animals to survive. But alas, they will still be rabbits and will always be rabbits.Do you include adaptation in that?
Lots of 'new DNA' arises DURING copying.
Surely, one who claims others need to learn some biology understands how things like duplications and insertions occur?
He's right though.Show me ONE instance of new DNA arising at any time??????? Duplications? Do you mean the copying of what already existed? Insertions? Do you mean inserting in a new place something that already existed? Apparently you fail to understand the difference between a T copied out of order and a T being created where the T never existed before. Not sure you understand what is meant by the term DNA. Not new allies, that are merely copies in a new order of what already exists, but DNA letter sequences that never existed before. This is a requirement in simple to complex, yet has never even been hinted at that it is possible.
Not new allies, that are merely copies in a new order of what already exists, but DNA letter sequences that never existed before.
That's rather beside the point. The fact that you're willing to claim that populations of organisms with as much as 80% genetic variability between them are the "exact same", yet for some reason claim that other populations with maybe a 0.1% difference between them are fundamentally different shows how arbitrary your entire argument is.
Its not "new". It is simply what already existed copied into a new format. They wish to try to confuse the line between allies and DNA to the uninformed.He's right though.
It's how hereditary diseases emerge.
The "new" there is that the data is corrupted and not corrected.
No, an allie is simply a very small portion of what DNA is. You ask that I start with C and end up with C,T,G,A. I ask you to prove this is even remotely possible. Your only response is to attempt to tell me that the same letters copied into a different sequence is the same as adding a letter where it could not have existed before. Take that elsewhere, it doesn't fly and never will except in the minds of those that need to believe that copying a DNA letter that already exists equates to being the same as a DNA letter existing where it did not exist before. There is no comparison. Nor has any mutation ever created a new letter sequence. You require this. It is you that asks i start with a simple DNA and make new DNA where it never existed before. I simply ask you start with everything you see and simply change sequences, which is supported by all of genetics.A mutation resulting in a DNA sequence that is a new allele is by definition a new DNA sequence.
Or to use your own words, "a new order of what already exists" is a new DNA sequence.
Arguably, every single organism has DNA unique to them. However, this doesn't answer what would prevent DNA changes via evolutionary mechanisms from creating subsequent biodiversity.
No, an allie is simply a very small portion of what DNA is. You ask that I start with C and end up with C,T,G,A. I ask you to prove this is even remotely possible. Your only response is to attempt to tell me that the same letters copied into a different sequence is the same as adding a letter where it could not have existed before.
Because DNA can only work with one pattern.
The DNA that makes hair may be similar to that
which makes scales or fur, but it cannot make them
any more than a dog can grow wings or gills. DNA is
conservative, geared toward staying the same, not
gathering new information or changing functions.
I'm not making that claim, your own evolutionists admit they are the same species.
Asians have a huge variation between members of that group, yet they remain Asian. Are you saying we should classify Jung as a separate species than Yung? I dont think your own evolutionists would accept that. Why not call Africans a separate species from Asians then? Ahh, you dont want to do that since we aren't bacteria, yet see no problem trying to imply such diversity in bacteria might make them separate........ I sense a lack of true conviction of belief....
Show me ONE instance of new DNA arising at any time???????
Duplications? Do you mean the copying of what already existed? Insertions? Do you mean inserting in a new place something that already existed? Apparently you fail to understand the difference between a T copied out of order and a T being created where the T never existed before.
Not sure you understand what is meant by the term DNA.
Not new allies, that are merely copies in a new order of what already exists, but DNA letter sequences that never existed before. This is a requirement in simple to complex, yet has never even been hinted at that it is possible.
Because DNA can only work with one pattern..
If you're talking about adding a new nucleotides to a sequence, we already know that occurs. It's called an insertion mutation: Insertion (genetics) - Wikipedia
the same DNA letters copied into a new format as equating to the creation of DNA letters that did not exist before.
This is well known and documented.
No, an allie is simply a very small portion of what DNA is.... I simply ask you start with everything you see and simply change sequences, which is supported by all of genetics.
Hey, its ypour theory, simple to complex. I already know it was created from preexisting matter - dust.What do you mean "new" DNA? Are you really asking aout DNA being conjured from nothing?
Its your theory, convince me it has merit. Its evolutionists that insist it is possible. Are you saying its not?How else do you propose 'new' DNA 'arising'?
My biology is quite sufficient, which is why you know you cant explain the creation of new DNA letters with any plausibility, which is why you revert to the attempted strawman argument, when your attempt at trying to convince me C,T,G,A copied into a new format was the same as making C where it didnt exist before.You are arguing a strawman and apparently do not have sufficient high school - level biology know it.
You have failed to make your case. I asked you to explain how a C arises in the DNA strand where it never existed before in the strand. Simple to complex. If you have no answer say so and stop trying to blame others comprehension because yu lack the science to explain what is impossible and never once observed.Not by the way you are using it, apparently not.
So you are 100% ignorant of how genomes evolve - and here you are implying that I do not even know what DNA is.
You really need to drink a big old jug of humility and look up "the Dunning-Kruger effect."
Im glad your entire argument against facts resides in a spelling error. Just goes to show the lack of any plausibility when instead of debating the facts evolutionists turn to ad hominem attacks because of spelling errors.Um... Mr.Biology Expert?
I think you mean ALLELE.
LOL!
...but that a C can exist where C never existed at all in the entire genetic strand.
Im glad your entire argument against facts resides in a spelling error.
Just goes to show the lack of any plausibility when instead of debating the facts evolutionists turn to ad hominem attacks because of spelling errors.
Lets understand it is not the same at all.So.... The gene for the protein cytochrome c, found in all vertebrates, can differ by as much as 80% in its DNA sequence in different taxa, yet they all produce a functioing protein.
Explain that if DNA can only use 1 pattern?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?