• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

What is the basis for Sola Scriptura?

gtsecc

Aspirant
Sep 3, 2004
8,343
263
56
✟9,845.00
Faith
Anglican
1. Anglicans specifically accept scripture as final authority. All Priests must take an oath to that before they are ordained.

2. Ordination of openly gay Bishops is certainly against tradition and traditional understanding of scripture. The Anglican Communion has made this view clear.

3. This is getting off topic.

 
Upvote 0

gtsecc

Aspirant
Sep 3, 2004
8,343
263
56
✟9,845.00
Faith
Anglican
It is not disputed that the "original" canon contained more than 66 books.

There are other writings written by accepted authorities within the faith, that no sect of Christianity has ever considered canon, yet never disputed either. What you have stated would imply the Clement’s writings are or should be included in the Bible since they are undisputed writings by authorities in the Church, and I am pretty sure that is not what you are saying.



You have to argue a few things, I believe:

1. The authors were not in error.

2. The undivided Church, correctly choose which writings to include in the Canon of scripture.



Then, if you only want 66 books, you have to show that Jesus and the disciples used Greek texts of the Old Testament, which did NOT include "apocryphal" books.

AND

You have to use Church authority to re-canonize scripture, using it again to whittle the canon down to 66 books. but, once you have the Bible, does all authority have to come from it? SO, you have to use the larger canon to whittle itself down ot a smaller canon. Not impossible, but pretty convoluted. Is there another way?
 
Upvote 0

Bulldog

Don't Tread on Me
Jan 19, 2004
7,125
176
22 Acacia Avenue
✟8,212.00
Faith
Protestant
Politics
US-Libertarian
 
Upvote 0

JM

Confessional Free Catholic
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2004
17,477
3,736
Canada
✟879,820.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Others
Qoheleth said:
If I may.

The Reformed churches practice Infant Baptism-correct?

What Sola Scriptura passages point to this as a correct and commanded practice?

Scripture doesn't and thats why you have reformed baptists to boot!
 
Upvote 0

gtsecc

Aspirant
Sep 3, 2004
8,343
263
56
✟9,845.00
Faith
Anglican
Bulldog said:
It's illogical to make one prove a negative.

Fine.
The point is Christ was known to have used Greek Old Testament text, so it would suggest they must have used the Septuigent. This leaves some problems getting to a 66 book canon. I think one way would be to show that they used Greek Scripture which did not include deutero canon material. Myself, I think they probably did use the Septuagint, and therefore accepted deutero canon material.
 
Upvote 0

gtsecc

Aspirant
Sep 3, 2004
8,343
263
56
✟9,845.00
Faith
Anglican
Qoheleth said:
If I may.

The Reformed churches practice Infant Baptism-correct?

What Sola Scriptura passages point to this as a correct and commanded practice?

I think this can be done.
We know whole households were baptized and circumsized, but I am not sure what passage. This leads me to think they much have circumsized adults (ouch) and baptized infants.
 
Upvote 0

JM

Confessional Free Catholic
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2004
17,477
3,736
Canada
✟879,820.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Others
This is the one most have trouble with:
 
Upvote 0

gtsecc

Aspirant
Sep 3, 2004
8,343
263
56
✟9,845.00
Faith
Anglican
This is getting way off topic. Some accept Article XVII, and others do not. You can find the most extreme Calvinists and Catholics under Anglicanism. As the body of Christ, we cannot simple excommunicate a part that offends us. like wise, we should be mindful of the whole body, and very very careful when making unilateral decision because it not only effects that one part, but also the Whole Body.



If you want to know more about Anglicanism, ask in STR.


 
Reactions: JM
Upvote 0

AndOne

Deliver me oh Lord, from evil men
Apr 20, 2002
7,477
462
Florida
✟28,628.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married

It really wasn't off topic - I wasn't trying to debate the right or wrong of ordaning a gay priest - but I was showing how Anglican tradition is indeed not in line with the clear cut teachings of scripture.
 
Reactions: JM
Upvote 0