I don't read "talk origins" (wash my mouth.) the atheistic evo fundies unholy babble. You ought to take time out to learn what evidence is rather than link me to biased opinion.
FoeHammer.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I don't read "talk origins" (wash my mouth.) the atheistic evo fundies unholy babble. You ought to take time out to learn what evidence is rather than link me to biased opinion.Better yet, why don't you have a read of http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/list.html and http://www.ebonmusings.org/evolution/index.html
I would quote some, but there's SO MUCH THERE.
The Indians did the same thing. Those accused of something would stand in line with those not accused. Then they would heat a knife and briefly touch each tongue. The person whose tongue swelled was usually the guilty party, as salivation stops when someone gets nervous.
as should you good sir. its tough refuting Pratt over and over and over and over. web links are easier.You ought to take time out to learn what evidence is...
The world speaks and you and your theology are not upon its lips.
You thought? I haven't seen any evidence of you thinking, just creationist reacting.In other words you can't? I thought not.
Now that is nonsense.That would depend on whether you think it makes sense or not. It doesn't make sense to me therefore it is nonsense.
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion but not his own facts and the facts from the study of biology, geology and paleontology show that life has been descending from common ancestors on this planet for hundreds of millions of year.The only argument you can have with that would amount to nothing more than a difference of opinion.
So you don't think that a talking snake is nonsense? How about a man made from mud or a woman from a rib or a women turning into a pillar of salt or the sun "standing still"? And yet you think one of the best evidenced theories is science is nonsense.I have a different opinion with regards to "talking snakes" and created kinds.
No you didn't, post #44 page 5 go take another look.So this evidence you speak of amounts to nothing more than yet more differences of opinion? [/quote]
I wrote
So what should you do? Assume that a demon in the form of talking snake did it and stop investigating?
This is exactly the creationist approach to origins. Read AV sig. "God did it - Case Closed".
Actually you have already seen lots of evidence for evolution you say we can't provide. Now exactly what am I supposed to see within???Actually you already have the evidence that you say I cannot provide. Look without and look within... That is real evidence, now, what do you make of that evidence?
Au contraire --- [bible]Luke 19:40[/bible][bible]Romans 8:22[/bible]
the stones say the world is alot older then you think it is
The great creationist dodge. All of the evidence for evolution is "biased opinion". If you refuse to look at evidence for evolution it is no wonder you don't see any. Your approach is God did it case closed just like AV. You assume a supernatural entity was responsible and stop looking. This is exactly the point I made in post 44 on page 5. Thank you for proving it for me.I don't read "talk origins" (wash my mouth.) the atheistic evo fundies unholy babble. You ought to take time out to learn what evidence is rather than link me to biased opinion.
FoeHammer.
The great creationist dodge. All of the evidence for evolution is "biased opinion". If you refuse to look at evidence for evolution it is no wonder you don't see any. Your approach is God did it case closed just like AV. You assume a supernatural entity was responsible and stop looking. This is exactly the point I made in post 44 on page 5. Thank you for proving it for me.
Do you think it was created 6,000 years ago or not?
You're asking me? I am not surprised that even you don't know what you believe since your posts on the topic have been so illogical.Do I?
.....
I know exactly what evidence is and that it cannot be provided on a thread in a forum on the web. All you can give are opinions of interpretations, more opinions of interpretations and yet more opinions of interpretations.as should you good sir. its tough refuting Pratt over and over and over and over. web links are easier.
Mabye he's waiting you to tell us how you think the world is. Was it created 6,000 years ago or not?Moonlancer, no offense, my friend, but it only took you 6 minutes to tell me the stones say the world is older than I think it is; but it's been 20 minutes now since I've asked you how old I think the world is. What gives here?
Well it seems obvious to you now and it was blatantly obvious to me from the outset but the OP'er made the silly mistake of doing what he was accusing creationists of doing.... kinda takes the wind out of his sails (and those who initially agreed with him) doesn't it?
Yes, since I believe in The Living God who gave us life.
Life comes from life.This is what we observe.
Every instance of live birth ever witnessed and recorded. Selective breeding programmes, bacteria producing bacteria and fruit flies producing fruit flies.
Wow! Why do I bother? You obviously don't understand what a strawman argument isYou freely admit to proposing a hypothetical situation and then accuse me of building strawmen LOL! go figure.
FoeHammer.
Moonlancer, no offense, my friend, but it only took you 6 minutes to tell me the stones say the world is older than I think it is; but it's been 20 minutes now since I've asked you how old I think the world is. What gives here?
Moonlancer, second time, how old do I think this world is?
Moonlancer, second time, how old do I think this world is?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?