Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If only that were true. The simple fact is that those that understand how science is done and have a good understanding of science itself accept the fact that the life we observe today is the product of evolution. Your side lost over 100 years ago. People here are merely trying to help you.WOW!!!! I'm convinced.
I understand your coloring book concept of evolutionism. You haven't shown that it actually happens.
Similarities of the amino acid chains DO NOT indicate the motor proteins likely evolved from the same proteins as other motor proteins. It only shows they are similar. It is your assumption they evolved from a similar protein. An argument can easily be made that the similarities are there because of a common creator.
If only that were true. The simple fact is that those that understand how science is done and have a good understanding of science itself accept the fact that the life we observe today is the product of evolution. Your side lost over 100 years ago. People here are merely trying to help you.
Similarities of the amino acid chains DO NOT indicate the motor proteins likely evolved from the same proteins as other motor proteins. It only shows they are similar. It is your assumption they evolved from a similar protein. An argument can easily be made that the similarities are there because of a common creator.
Lets start here....God would use similiar parts, components, organs, systems in His creation. They would be different because each of His creation would be serving a different purpose.Let's hear your argument for these similarites being evidence of a common creator then.
It would really help your ability to debate if you learned what evidence is. It is not that difficult of a concept. My sign lays out what scientific evidence is for you. Just in case you were wondering, scientific evidence is what the evolution side has in spades and the creationist side totally lacks.Gag me with a spoon.
Lets start here....God would use similiar parts, components, organs, systems in His creation. They would be different because each of His creation would be serving a different purpose.
It's really hard to take you seriously when all you do is spew out nonsense. In your last post all you did was say nonsense without an explanation.Sorry, but that is not evidence. It is simply an ad hoc explanation.
God would use similiar parts, components, organs, systems in His creation.
Jimmy, you see, I got the same evidence you have.LOL, and you've got the cheek to accuse people of presenting you with a colouring book version? It's a start though, have you got any evidence for your assertion (the fossil record, nested heirachies etc)?
Jimmy, you see, I got the same evidence you have.
No, I don't see. You're going to have to explain it. Let's start with the fossil record, how does it support your idea?
It's really hard to take you seriously when all you do is spew out nonsense. In your last post all you did was say nonsense without an explanation.
You're not a very good debater.
Many animals are similar.
Food.What purpose to mosquitoes serve?
Ontological reduction is myopic to science.It's almost as if god used evolution as a means for diversity and distribution.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?