I'm just curious because I've heard this before. Would there be any sources from the time period that I could see in order to affirm or deny this?
constance said:It is pretty widely accepted by historians that he was, and it was widely known by his contemporaries as well. He had open relationships (kissing, petting, etc) with other men(Bothwell, Somerset, Buckingham) When Elizabeth died, the joke was:
Rex fuit Elizabeth, nunc est regina Jacobus (Elizabeth was King, now James is the Queen)
BlackSaab52 said:I'm just curious because I've heard this before. Would there be any sources from the time period that I could see in order to affirm or deny this?
bitwise said:What does King James I have to do with the King James Bible?
King James I was not one of the translators, he was not one of the scholars, and he certainly has nothing to do with the authorship of the Bible.
King James I was merely the King of England during the time when the Protestant clergy announced their desire for a new translation in 1604.
bitwise said:What does King James I have to do with the King James Bible? King James I was not one of the translators, he was not one of the scholars, and he certainly has nothing to do with the authorship of the Bible. King James I was merely the King of England during the time when the Protestant clergy announced their desire for a new translation in 1604.
-bit
danbarnaba said:Soon every famous person in history would be gay. Check out this news where a stupid blasphemer claims that Jesus was a woman http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44563
Diane_Windsor said:I highly reccommend that you read God's Secretaries: The Making of the King James Bible by Adam Nicolson, which is available at Amazon.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?