• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Venn Diagramming This Mess

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
So much the worse for them. It's not like being in the wrong is anything advantageous.

On the contrary, being wrong about something is not the main issue for some, it is being able to believe in something or hold onto a belief at all costs that dominates the psyche.
 
Upvote 0

Received

True love waits in haunted attics
Mar 21, 2002
12,817
774
42
Visit site
✟53,594.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Ok, but this would mean that your entire "intuition"- approach (which seems to be your foremost interest as of lately, and which actually was the keyterm at the beginning) is left behind.

In a nominal but not necessarily phenomenal way, yeah.

What is it you´d like me to expand on? Do you have a specific question concerning this paragraph?

Just more of what you said, maybe a rephrase. It's interesting but I'm not quite getting it all.

What is the opposite of using intuition in a totally nilly willy way, and how do I determine which way I use it? What are the criteria for a non-nilly-willy-use of intuition?

By "willy nilly" I meant, basically, people who are lying to themselves by *saying* they believe one thin (via intuition), but really believe another.


What I'm essentially getting from this is that there is a difference between private experience or validation of something as true and the ability to communicate how this private experience (intuitively validated) is true via reason. Intuition -- grasping that something is true or not -- is a private, immediate thing, whereas reason is a "public" (intersubjetive), non-immediate thing. Pretty neat stuff if you ask me.
 
Upvote 0

PsychoSarah

Chaotic Neutral
Jan 13, 2014
20,522
2,609
✟102,963.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
So much the worse for them. It's not like being in the wrong is anything advantageous.

Sure it does, the placebo effect demonstrates pretty well how just thinking something is true (that you took a medication that will provide treatment) can have an impact.
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Feel'n the Burn of Philosophy!
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
24,933
11,670
Space Mountain!
✟1,377,512.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

Received,

I would place intuition in a separate ontological category from the other three. The reason being is that intuition can be singular in its manifestation, whereas as the other three 'entities' are more prone to being 'communal' in their existence as phenomena reflecting some kind of 'realia.' Reason and Science particular need community interaction and confirmation to be recognized as what they are; for instance, Einstein wasn't reasonable about the theory of Relativity just because he put it all together. His theory had to be confirmed by other individuals before being accepted. Intuition doesn't have to have this kind of ontological state to be what it is; I can intuit what I will, and it won't really matter to me whether you agree with ideas I intuit.

Peace
 
Upvote 0

Received

True love waits in haunted attics
Mar 21, 2002
12,817
774
42
Visit site
✟53,594.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

I was trying to get to the idea that intuition could be independent on its own by having it as the outermost sphere, with space between it and the one below it.
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Feel'n the Burn of Philosophy!
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
24,933
11,670
Space Mountain!
✟1,377,512.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I was trying to get to the idea that intuition could be independent on its own by having it as the outermost sphere, with space between it and the one below it.

Received,

Ok, then. You've already thought about this, I see. I guess we need something more/other than a Venn Diagram to show the 'space' of which you speak.

Good thoughts on your part, though. Thank you. Interesting perspective.

Peace
 
Upvote 0