- Mar 1, 2004
- 3,026
- 500
- 67
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Democrat
The veiling, seclusion, forgetting to mention the names of women may have different origins than you think
Consider the books of Enoch to which the bible refers
the books of Enoch were written well before new testament times and before that were passed down orally to the people in that part of the world. The Bible refers to them, and Jesus speaks in the same terms used in them when He calls Himself the "Son of Man"
Whether they are truth or not is irrelevant, middle easterners definitely did regard them as true at one time. In the book of 1 Corinthians 11, some want to cover the women to keep the angels from lusting after them, to which Paul replies that "we have no such custom in the church" yet this passage has itself been used to cover Christian women as well.
For the record, I think that covering or secluding women is a misguided approach to their protection, but even in the OT women are referred to as veiled and covered - even though it was never commanded.
Whether they are truth or not is irrelevant, middle easterners definitely did regard them as true at one time. In the book of 1 Corinthians 11, some want to cover the women to keep the angels from lusting after them, to which Paul replies that "we have no such custom in the church" yet this passage has itself been used to cover Christian women as well.
For the record, I think that covering or secluding women is a misguided approach to their protection, but even in the OT women are referred to as veiled and covered - even though it was never commanded.