That's definitely a man.I hate to be "that guy", but is this the woman who we're talking about here?
View attachment 332916
I would never have even guessed that this is a person who's trying to identify as a woman.
When did whataboutisms become a valid form of debate?Are you presuming that all transgender folks are groomers and abusers and like child inappropriate content?
What if the person arrested for child inappropriate content or abuse is a straignt Republican.
See Recent news - Republican arrested for child sexual molestation and drug possession
Wow! SickFormer N.H. lawmaker charged with distributing child sex abuse images - The Boston Globe
Some court records that detail the allegations against former state Representative Stacie Marie Laughton remained sealed Friday afternoon.www.bostonglobe.com
The country's first elected transgender politician, who formerly served as a state representative in the New Hampshire legislature has been arrested on charges of distributing child inappropriate contentography.
Stacie-Marie Laughton, a biological male who lives as a woman, was elected in 2012, but was unable to serve after her criminal past emerged in which she was sentenced to probation stemming from a 2008 felony conviction for credit card fraud.
I'm sure this is all just a coincidence. Thoughts? Sorry if the quote doesn't fit the link. I had to find a story that didn't include the words cheese pizza.
My POINT is that just because one transgender person is a pedophile, it does not mean all transgender people are - so there was no "you guessed it" that should automatically pop up in regards to that. It is the same as if one Republican or Democrat molests children, it does not mean all do that so we should not presume they are.When did whataboutisms become a valid form of debate?
The truth is, while it is distasteful and does not cast a good light on the party of choice. It happened. And the person was who he was and evidently did what he did.
Saying, well…. The other party does it to or were are not the only ones. Serves no useful purpose. IMHO
We still have a pedophile with more likely than not multiple child victims.
What is more important? Defending a political party or putting a pedophile in jail?
Good point.My POINT is that just because one transgender person is a pedophile, it does not mean all transgender people are - so there was no "you guessed it" that should automatically pop up in regards to that. It is the same as if one Republican or Democrat molests children, it does not mean all do that so we should not presume they are.
Bad point.All pedophiles belong in jail.
I agree with that.Good point.
Bad point.
I’ll go with “all pedophiles whom act out on their paraphilia belong in jail”.
Are you presuming that all transgender folks are groomers and abusers and like child inappropriate content?
What if the person arrested for child inappropriate content or abuse is a straignt Republican.
See Recent news - Republican arrested for child sexual molestation and drug possession
Yes, much of what you describe is upsetting. And covers straight as well as gay.A groomer is a groomer that is without a doubt. It come in people of different ideologies, believes and genders. However no one would defend the individual and publicly endorse such a behavior.
That is until you find out that the pride marches approved by the states feature nudist flaunting their genitals at minors. Old man wearing nothing but his tiny whitey humping the air in front of children to the cheers of the crowds. Fetishes wearing leather bondage roleplaying for children to see. Drag shows targeting children. Schools allowing erotica books into the library under the guise of LGBT acceptance. All these and no action was taken against them.
In a way all these acts are somewhat protected. And at times promoted by the state. The threshold to call them groomers and abusers for the LGBT community are higher than the average for all other groups of people.
General people are just sick of the at this point the quadruple standards levied upon them. Any wonder when one from that community is caught red handed that people would highlight it? Let's be realistic it is catharsis at this point after being called phobic for pointing out the obvious.
And nothing he said was wrong a trans was arrested for being a "P***". It is the implications might some find objections to, not the fact itself.
Yes, much of what you describe is upsetting. And covers straight as well as gay.
I have known a few true transgender people and they were quiet, not flashy, looked like what they thought themselves to be, did not engage in any public displays and were not pedophiles.
Most on here confuse a true transgender person with those that engage in transvestism in order to perform or get attention or make political statements . A truly transgender person does not do 'drag', a transvestite does.
Actually, it was saying that rate of offenders (against people under 12) was the same between the two groups.As much as I'd prefer this was the situation at hand....page 19 includes the footnote that for both categories of offenders, roughly 1/3 victims were 12yo or younger.
Again, this means that the disproportionate number of offenders makes 1 category several times more likely to offend.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?