• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

US Military Bases named after Confederate Generals

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
42,126
22,729
US
✟1,731,116.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
How could it be otherwise. What other reason would one have for renaming anything if it was not motivated by some form of hatred of the name?

Lots of bases have been renamed over the years. Old Ft Crook near Omaha, NE, was originally named for a US Army general, then renamed Offutt Field for a WWI Army Air Corps lieutenant. No hatred involved. Military bases in the past have been named by some quite arbitrary and arcane rules in the past, and often merely by the whims of a single individual.

With regard to Ft Hood:


Naming of U.S. Army Posts | U.S. Army Center of Military History

Note that there was opposition to the naming of Ft Hood after John Hood even at the time, and Hood had been the only Confederate officer under consideration.
 
Reactions: iluvatar5150
Upvote 0

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
42,126
22,729
US
✟1,731,116.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

That was a lengthy non-answer.
 
Reactions: iluvatar5150
Upvote 0

Tropical Wilds

Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
Oct 2, 2009
6,720
4,818
New England
✟259,292.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

So to be clear... You don’t think the south was wrong to try and form their own country in order to preserve an economy that relied on slave and child labor, representation without taxation while also taking a disproportionate amount of federal funds, and preservation of class-based society that eliminated the middle class and allowed the top 1% to completely and unilaterally make all rules, laws, and regulations which only saw to their interests?
 
Reactions: john23237
Upvote 0

section9+1

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2017
1,662
1,158
58
US
✟88,913.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So to be clear, I am not supporting the south's internal affairs, but I see no wrong in their trying to secede. And I've seen nothing here to change that. And I see nothing wrong with keeping the names these places have.
 
Upvote 0

Tropical Wilds

Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
Oct 2, 2009
6,720
4,818
New England
✟259,292.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
So to be clear, I am not supporting the south's internal affairs, but I see no wrong in their trying to secede. And I've seen nothing here to change that. And I see nothing wrong with keeping the names these places have.

If you support them trying to and see nothing wrong with them trying to secede, you also support their reasons for doing so. Ignoring that you’re saying you don’t see what the problem is in fracturing the country via war, you’re saying you’re ok with facilitating appalling and shameful practices that are against the core morality of both objective and religious persons.

If you see nothing wrong with the names, you wouldn’t object to our next US base or ship or military interest being named Fort Hitler? Or the USS Sadam? Or Fort McVey? Maybe you’d me totally ok with joining our military and representing USS Mohamed Atta?
 
Upvote 0

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,439
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟617,196.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Your problem is someone thinks differently than you do. Don't you celebrate diversity?
Celebrating diversity and naming US forts after men who were traitors, who led troops against the US military and who supported slavery are two different things.
 
Reactions: john23237
Upvote 0

section9+1

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2017
1,662
1,158
58
US
✟88,913.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Celebrating diversity and naming US forts after men who were traitors, who led troops against the US military and who supported slavery are two different things.
A question was asked in the OP. I volunteered my answer. That's all I did. If it makes your butt hurt that's your problem. I am not here to make you happy.
 
Upvote 0

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,439
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟617,196.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
A question was asked in the OP. I volunteered my answer. That's all I did. If it makes your butt hurt that's your problem. I am not here to make you happy.
This is a discussion and debate forum. If you say something that I disagree with I will say that. If you don’t want people challenging what you say, don’t participate in a debate forum.
 
Upvote 0

section9+1

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2017
1,662
1,158
58
US
✟88,913.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Having different views is fine. But don't make people out to be evil or ignorant because they don't see things the way you see them. I fully don't require people to agree with me on religion or politics. I don't expect them to. I'm not saying agree with me. I'm saying I will not be made into something I am not because I see this differently.
 
Upvote 0

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,439
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟617,196.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
My exact words were "Celebrating diversity and naming US forts after men who were traitors, who led troops against the US military and who supported slavery are two different things." Exactly where did I say you were evil or ignorant? Those words are not in there, nor did I imply any such thing.
 
Upvote 0

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,439
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟617,196.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
I don't agree with you and I feel no reason to do so. That's how it is.
Not sure what your point is. I don't expect you to agree with me. A discussion and debate forum is for people to discuss different ideas. But don't say that I said or implied that you are evil or ignorant because I never did that.
 
Upvote 0

Tropical Wilds

Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
Oct 2, 2009
6,720
4,818
New England
✟259,292.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
So to be clear, I am not supporting the south's internal affairs, but I see no wrong in their trying to secede. And I've seen nothing here to change that. And I see nothing wrong with keeping the names these places have.

Well then. Not sure I’d brag about any of that publicly...
 
Reactions: ArmenianJohn
Upvote 0

Tropical Wilds

Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
Oct 2, 2009
6,720
4,818
New England
✟259,292.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Your problem is someone thinks differently than you do. Don't you celebrate diversity?

When it comes to naming military installations after terrorists, enemies of our country, or supporting racism... No, I can’t say that I do.
 
Reactions: ArmenianJohn
Upvote 0

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,439
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟617,196.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
The Senate voted today to override Trump's veto of the Defense Bill. The legislation establishes a commission to study and provide recommendations, within three years, on the removal of names, symbols, displays and monuments that honor or commemorate the Confederacy.

If I were betting, I would bet against these bases retaining their existing names. Perhaps instead of arguing that the names should be retained, it would be better to identify heroes from wars and put together a list of possible new names for these bases. There are many heroes who have never had anything named after them and who, unlike some of these Confederates, were competent. After all, the Navy recently picked USS Doris Miller as the name for an upcoming aircraft carrier (although there was previously a destroyer named after him).
 
Upvote 0

section9+1

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2017
1,662
1,158
58
US
✟88,913.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
When it comes to naming military installations after terrorists, enemies of our country, or supporting racism... No, I can’t say that I do.
Since we are virtually nothing to each other, it's not important if we don't agree. I'm good with disagreement.
 
Upvote 0