Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
John 21.25 is a very interesting verse. I think that commentators have over the years had various ideas about it.Jerry, I will say this though, ....
Joh_21:25 And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written. Amen.
And also this, ....We are to live by EVERY Word that proceeds out of The Mouth of God, do think He has nothing more to say today than that which is written with pen and ink?
You don't get what I am saying.He did, but it was NOT the first Adam, but The Last which is His Son, His Word, His Seed, after His kind.
The rest of what you said, is just nonsense, there is no such thing as free will Dr. that is one of the biggest lies that we have ever believed. That is what I define as looking through that window. It's the same lie that the serpent convince Adam of and the same one he has convinced you of.
I'm reading a book a book whose purpose is to give "three views of hell", traditional, anihilation, and universal reconciliation. My question is, " do you think universal reconciliation is heresy?
Jerry, the scriptures is plain, it says he, the king of Tyre was in Eden, so was Pharaoh, if you chose to read them another way who am I to stop you.
How is it possible to claim a creator that you just essentially said wants evil to happen is All Good?
So you are basically saying you can't answer the question?Because without it, there would be no knowing Him, and how good He really is. Without Darkness, we would not know Light.
Without Error, we would not know Truth. Without Sin we would not know Salvation.
There would be no need of A Saviour if we were all created Perfect. We would never Know God in The Depths of who His is and all His Attributes. Without hate, we would not know Love.
And don't forget God knew Good and Evil before Adam, and said now he has become one of us to know good and evil.
So you are basically saying you can't answer the question?
You answered a hypothetical I did not ask - why you think there is evil. I asked why you think you call God ALL GOOD if at same time you claim He wanted/created evil?
I did not ask if God could use evil deeds for Good. I asked how you can see God as ALL GOOD when you claim He wanted evil - basically did evil in making Adam the way you claim He did. No mystery. How is a Creator considered ALL Good when you just said He did evil?God is All Good, and I told you what I know. Just because you can't see the benefits that evil is a tool that God uses for the Good is not my problem it's yours. The Bible calls iniquity a mystery. So I think you would have to reconcile it for yourself.
Isa 45:7 I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.
Well, we can agree to disagree whether there were/are exceptions for people Elijah and Enoch, maybe Moses that God made for people like them at the end of their life here. To say He could not make exceptions is to limit God. Clearly the Bible says something special happened to those men at the end of their life that represents some sort of exception compared to us average blokes. To suggest otherwise is deny what scripture plainly says. Does it mean I, as a Catholic, have to believe because the Church teaches these men (and open to possibility of "others") were "assumed" into Heaven equals they ascended like Our Lord God - no and actually that is explainable but goes beyond the topic here. If you want to ask questions about salvation, what it means to be Holy as He is holy...etc then another thread is needed.
As for immortality, most (not all) would never refute the immortality of our soul/spirit, so am thinking (hoping) we are only talking about our bodies. Clearly God put Adam in a place where he "COULD HAVE" lived (body and soul) forever as the story indicates that after he sinned Adam no longer had/was prevented from availing himself of that ability - whatever one sees the Tree of Life as represents - (perhaps multiple meanings but I like the common association of the Tree of Life with the Son of God). If God had not intended for Adam to live forever, then why originally put man in a place where the free access to that potential existed?
Also, as I mentioned, it makes no sense to say God made man to share in His Eternal happiness if He did not at the same time provide the means for man (body and soul) lasting forever in order to that sharing possible. And that does not necessarily mean He created Adam immortal, but more in line with the story, He gave Adam/mankind access to the ability to live forever - which the Tree of Life represents. Adam appears to have had such access, at least until he sinned. And that temporary access to immortality is suggested as at least one explanation for the longevity attributed to our common ancestors beginning with Adam, the effect of which appears to have diminish with succeeding generations. The diminishing aspect also in keeping with the idea sin corrupting everything, including our physical bodies - death came for all by the sin of one man.
And I like the attempt at arriving at a purpose which precludes the need to say creation, including man, was originally perfect. You were the first UR here to attempt to do so - congrats. Am completing the thought, so correct if I got it wrong. The claim is God made us man imperfect in order to then "work in" us so that eventually we can reach a state where we will "be made in His Image". As I have repeatedly pointed out before in this thread to Hillsage and others, this is the end result of the UR theology - people just need time and perhaps a coach helps (Jesus)- to finally reach the point (either in this life or in Hell) to "only choose Good" so they can then be "made in His Image". I can see a need for assistance/coaching but I see no necessity in that construct for a Savior. The already stated orthodox purpose for God making man combined with our belief that our current state being a result of the sin of the first man creates a true NECESSITY for a Savior to restore us so we truly and correctly reflect the Image in which we were made.
I also see direct contradictions with such thoughts beginning with the creation story stating that He made man/Adam in His Image. Either He did or did not, apparently many UR holders here believe He did not make us in Image as the creation story states, but will one day. Some URs attempt to circumvent that by suggesting the creation story mingles talk of our past/origins with a future state, but I think that only further muddies the waters.
"Potential" in regards to immortality is a way of suggesting that the access Adam had to "the Tree of Life" was not something God gave man as part of our nature - IOW He did not make Adam's body immortal, but rather something He originally gave mankind direct access to - in order to allow man to live forever - something that sustained the body in a state of immortality - and the lasting (but diminishing because of sin) effects of that seen by (and explains) the longevity the Bible attributes t our early ancestors. It is only if we CAN (potential) live forever that talk of sharing in His Eternal Happiness makes any sense. He does not need to make us at all, so saying He wants us to share in His Eternal Happiness must mean He wants us to do so eternally - which requires we do not cease to exist as human (both body and soul - the way He made us).
Saying the Grace Jesus made possible is eternal - is my reference to the thought that that a single sacrifice is a continual sacrifice for all sin - forward and backward in time. Which BTW if all that is needed is for us to eventually with time (this life or the next in Hell) to learn by God "working in us" to only choose Good - then there really is no need for that sacrifice. Which was also one of my points regarding the UR theology negating the traditional purpose for which we say God made us.
Essentially you are saying creating/making "not Good" is Good (since you deny doing so is evil). You have also essentially just said that "creating" is not "doing". And you are correct, I see no way I could understand those statements. God allowing something for the greater good I can understand, even if I cannot see the greater good.I told you, you just won't accept my answer because you yourself don't understand how God being good could create evil. I also told you how evil is a benefit in His hands. And yet God is still good. I never said God does evil. You did. not me. God creates evil, that doesn't mean He does evil.
No, scripture does not show God creating evil. Scripture shows God allowing evil to exist by allowing some of the creatures He made the ability to do evil. Ability meaning capability, a choice, their choice and not a part of them (as something He made in them). He does not force us to love Him. No. He gives us (and the angels) the freedom to love or not love All Good(Him). The not part would be doing evil, making evil a reality. If none of those created creatures did evil, then this world would be exactly as He originally made it, Very Good.Does the scripture say He creates evil Dr. or not? I don't have a problem with it. I can see how He would use it in many different ways. But can you?
We further off topic to continue this, so I will try to redirect back to UR.That's fine my friend, but as long as we disagree on this issue, I'm not sure how else to explain what else I believe. It seems the only argument you've brought up is "that would limit God", which seems to imply that we can claim whatever we wish, and if anyone disagrees then they are "limiting" God; despite the fact that this contradicts plenty of Scripture. So if it's okay, for the sake of this discussion, can we just assume that Enoch and Elijah are dead?
I would have to argue that man was not created immortal. The Tree of Life was in the Garden, and I see no reason for there to be a Tree that would give us immortality, if we were already immortal.
"For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality." 1 Corinthians 15:53
Paul says we must "put on immortality". This suggests to me that we are not immortal, but we will become immortal after the Resurrection. This immortality has nothing to do with "eternal life" or aionios zoe. This "eternal life" is the life we experience now, in that we get to know the One True God and His Son.
"And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent." John 17:3
Surely as long as we are living this meaningless existence, there is nothing greater than this.
I actually don't see a diminishing lifespan after Adam. Adam only lived to be 930, but Methuselah lived to be 969. Noah was the last man to live a long life before God shortened our days, and he lived to be 950, which is 20 years longer than Adam. I don't necessarily believe this has to do with how sinful these people were. It doesn't seem illogical to assume that mankind lived these long lives for the advancement of civilization. Imagine if Isaac Newton or Albert Einstein lived to be a thousand years old.
I would like to share with you my interpretation of the Garden incident. I've posted this on here before, so if it's okay I'll just copy and paste it:
(There's a few things written here that I have already said, but hopefully this will clarify why I said these things.)
"And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth." Genesis 1:26
God tells us right in the first chapter what His plan is for mankind. He is making us in His Image, after His Likeness. This required something that Adam and Eve did not possess when He created them: the Knowledge of Good and Evil.
Notice God says "let us make man in our Image", and then it says "so God created man in His Image". These two verbs are different because the process is different. Only God can create (Hebrew בָּרָא bara: create, fashion), but to make (Hebrew עָשָׂה asah: make, do, accomplish) requires taking what has been created, and bringing about something different.
Hebrew doesn't have tenses like English: past, present, and future. Instead, Hebrew has the Perfect and Imperfect aspect. "Make" is written in the Perfect aspect, which basically means "here now- but not yet) Here is an article about it:
http://www.truthortradition.com/articles/the-prophetic-perfect
After God says this, we read about how He set out to accomplish this. God Himself plants the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil in the middle of the Garden, along with the Tree of Life. I believe this next verse is where the true confusion lies:
"And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:
But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou [shalt] not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die." Genesis 2:16-17
Here, we see that God tells Adam that he may eat of every tree in the Garden. Then God warns man that if He eats of the Tree of Knowledge, he will die.
The problem with this translation is the word "shalt" in "thou shalt not eat of it". The word shalt is not in the original Hebrew. The original says:
וּמֵעֵ֗ץ (of the tree) הַדַּ֙עַת֙ (of the knowledge) ט֣וֹב (of good) וָרָ֔ע (and evil)לֹ֥א (not) תֹאכַ֖ל (eat) תֹאכַ֖ל (of)
God did not "command" them regarding whether they could eat of the Tree, He warned them of the consequences if they did eat. With this in mind, let's see if we can make sense of this all.
"Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?"Genesis3:1
So now we are introduced to the Serpent, whom God had made more subtile than any other beast. Right from the beginning, he lies to to Eve. God never said they may "not" eat of every tree, He said they "may" eat of every tree. This confuses Eve, but she responds with what God had told her:
"And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:
But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die." Genesis 3:2-3
Then, the Serpent lies again, but deceives Eve by mixing his lie with truth:
"And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil." Genesis 3:4-5
Eve did not know any better when she ate the Fruit. She had no knowledge of either Good or Evil. How could she have made a rational decision? This was all in perfect alignment of God's original and only plan. God verifies that everything is going according to His plan next:
"And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know goodand evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever" Genesis 3:22
You see my friend, this was not a huge mishap on God's part by which He had to resort to plan B. There is no plan B.
God desired to make man in His Image, and this required the Knowledge of Good and Evil. God Himself planted the Tree and created the Serpent to tempt Adam and Eve.
Adam and Eve had this new Knowledge, but they lacked the Wisdom and Prudence to use it. Yeshua fulfills this prophecy and purpose of mankind, as He is the first man to be given the status of Sonship and aquire the true Image of God:
"Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature" Colossians 1:15
And that is why Yeshua is our Savior. It is through Yeshua that God saves us. God alone is Savior of all mankind, but He has done this through His Messiah.
"I, even I, am the LORD; and beside me there is no saviour." Isaiah 43:11
"Him hath God exalted with his right hand to be a Prince and a Saviour, for to give repentance to Israel, and forgiveness of sins." Acts 5:31
"Of this man's seed hath God according to his promise raised unto Israel a Saviour, Jesus" Acts 13:23
"For I desired mercy, and not sacrifice; and the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings." Hosea 6:6
"I will not reprove thee for thy sacrifices or thy burnt offerings, to have been continually before me.
I will take no bullock out of thy house, nor he goats out of thy folds.
For every beast of the forest is mine, and the cattle upon a thousand hills.
I know all the fowls of the mountains: and the wild beasts of the field are mine.
If I were hungry, I would not tell thee: for the world is mine, and the fulness thereof.
Will I eat the flesh of bulls, or drink the blood of goats?
Offer unto God thanksgiving; and pay thy vows unto the most High:
And call upon me in the day of trouble: I will deliver thee, and thou shalt glorify me." Psalm 50:8
"For thou desirest not sacrifice; else would I give it: thou delightest not in burnt offering.
The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit: a broken and a contrite heart, O God, thou wilt not despise." Psalm 51:16
"Thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel; Put your burnt offerings unto your sacrifices, and eat flesh.
For I spake not unto your fathers, nor commanded them in the day that I brought them out of the land of Egypt, concerning burnt offerings or sacrifices:
But this thing commanded I them, saying, Obey my voice, and I will be your God, and ye shall be my people: and walk ye in all the ways that I have commanded you, that it may be well unto you.
But they hearkened not, nor inclined their ear, but walked in the counsels and in the imagination of their evil heart, and went backward, and not forward." Jeremiah 7:21
Sacrifices are not part of the Law. It was not required when God gave Moses the Law, and He put an end to it with Yeshua. There was no sin in Yeshua, which means He never broke a single Law ever. Yet we never once read of Yeshua giving a burnt offering. He loved God with all His heart. He was completely obedient, even when this obedience meant physical death. This love and obedience was His Sacrifice.
"Saying, Father, if thou be willing, remove this cup from me: nevertheless not my will, but thine, be done." Luke 22:42
"And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.
Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name:
That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth;
And that every tongue should CONFESS that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father." Philippians 2:8
God doesn't desire sacrifices, He desires mercy and justice. Yeshua received neither of those things, although no sin was found in Him.
I'm going to post one more large passage, and then I will stop for now. Please read this carefully as Paul explains everything:
"Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:
(For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.
Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.
But not as the offence, so also is the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many.
And not as it was by one that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgment was by one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offences unto justification.
For if by one man's offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.)
Therefore as by the offence of one [judgment came] upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one [the free gift came] upon all men unto justification of life.
For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.
Moreover the law entered, that the offence might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound:
That as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord." Romans 5:12
Thank you my friend and God bless you.
You cannot prove that with scripture, Satan was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the Truth, there is no truth in him, he was a liar from the beginning.
The Creation story we have been focusing on shows Adam bringing evil into existence after his being made VERY GOOD and put in a VERY GOOD place.
No, scripture does not show God creating evil.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?