• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

J_B_

I have answers to questions no one ever asks.
May 15, 2020
1,332
385
Midwest
✟125,725.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Isn't pretty much everything a person says an opinion?
Maybe that's only your opinion. ;P

It's possible the Turing Test has scientific criteria I am unaware of. If not, it's not much of a test.

As a side note, it's curious that the test was proposed as a blind test. It is interesting how people often give preference to the sight sense. If I see a mouse, it's real. If I only hear a mouse, maybe not. That made the scenarios of the movie Ex Machina all the more fascinating, as the main character was allowed full access to the AI - the point being it would be more persuasive if, even after seeing, etc. the AI, you're still convinced it's sentient. But that's a digression from my question.
 
Upvote 0

SelfSim

A non "-ist"
Jun 23, 2014
7,045
2,232
✟209,536.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
Is the Turing Test anything more than conversing with the thing in question and then rendering an opinion on whether it is human or not? The emphasis being on the word 'opinion'.
Correction: 'The emphasis being on all the words you used there, having overhwhelming objective evidence supporting the inference that they carry meanings confined to only human minds'.

I mean after all, why single out just one word: 'opinion' and ignore that overwhelming evidence?
What would possibly support separating this one word out from all the rest you're using there, whilst ignoring all the rest of that overwhelming evidence?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0