That's you projecting your opinion. There is a difference between knowledge/facts and opinions/beliefs. I'm going to say this up front about positive and negative prejudice. There is a form of wickedness that can be described as wanting to believe bad things about other people, as opposed to wanting to believe good things about other people. The pure of heart project their purity onto others and the defiled conscience projects it's impurity onto others. This is the contrast between grace through faith, and cynicism.
The fact is some people know more than other people as a matter of circumstance and they are smarter, wiser and better at some things than others. It's no one's fault that this occurs, and it should not be taken personal so as to get lifted up or put down. That is carnal vanity.
Suppose you had more experience and more knowledge about a job than the others next to you who were applying for the same job. Then as a matter of circumstance you would be able to answer some questions about how to go about doing the job better than they could simply because they did not have as much knowledge and experience as you. You could teach them a thing or two because it would be obvious to you that which they didn't know. Therefore. it would not be narcissistic to honestly state that you feel you could do a better job. It would not be meant to brag or to offend anyone.
Ironically this is you projecting your opinion.
Do you apply all this you've said when talking about Trump?
Of course. As I said some people are better at what they do than others as a matter of circumstance.
Both Hilary and Biden have been in politics for decades. Neither had ever been president before. Being vice president isn't the same as being president and requires different duties. Hilary was the wife of a president and followed him around during most of his duties, so she would be able to learn first hand what being a president is like.
So of all people, Hilary seems was better suited than others as a matter of circumstance.
As I explained, if you know more about the job than they do because you have had more experience, you will also know it's not a matter of inflated ego or carnal vanity.
How do you know Biden knew more about the job than Hilary?
First off, this isn't about being good at politics or involved in politics. The issue here is who has more experience about governing and how government works.
How do you know Hilary didn't have the experience of governing or knew how government works?
I've seen no candidates better than Joe in this election, despite his decline.
Just about any other democrat that isn't Biden.
And as you yourself said:
"He actually would be stupid to run for President if he thought the other candidate would make a better President."
As this video on narcissism explains, clinging to power is a trait of a narcissist.
Your own words condemn him.
The posted video only shows that old people become forgetful. The word stupid however implies low intelligence (NOT the same thing). The video proves he had forgotten why she couldn't be there, and his quick witted self-defamatory joke shows he is still an intelligent person.
Him being stupid is reference to your own comment about Biden stupid to run for president if he thought other candidates would make a better President.
Him being a forgetful, frail old man should be enough for him to step down. The self-defamatory joke could also be seen as deflection.
I can't say I've seen Joe say anything that shows a false humility.
Constantly evoking his dead son's name to garner sympathy.
Well, you're correct about discerning that Biden does not mean to offend anyone by saying he thinks he would be a better president.
How do you know that's what he was thinking when he said that?
I think we all have lied in some degree and insulted someone in some degree, and said things from a negative prejudice in some degree. The issue of them being negative traits is more complicated, because pride works to manifest both feeling lifted up and feeling put down. Sometimes what people perceive to be lies are simply honest mistakes and sometimes they are misunderstandings. Some people are easily insulted. Cynicism is self-fulfilling for the cynic. If you told someone who was easily insulted that they were easily insulted, guess what? They would be insulted. It's the intentions of the heart that show the difference between the wheat and tares.
Do you apply this same level of grace and understanding to Trump?
This also doesn't explain Biden's insults and racist comments, which appropriately demonstrates one of my points about Biden supporters. They just ignore it.
There's nothing immoral about clearing up misunderstandings. But one cannot justify wickedness.
Could you give an example that you've seen regarding Biden?
Therefore, I must disagree. I know a lie intends to pose as the truth so as to deceive, but there are nuances that reveal what is true and what is false. A misinformed person can accuse the honest man of being dishonest. The slanderer can also accuse those pointing out their slander; by claiming they are the ones slandering him. Similarly, my insistence that convincing proof be given to support any accusations against Biden is not wrong, even if you prefer to call it trying to justify Biden.
I've already provided "convincing proof" to you in regards to Biden. You must have missed the post or ignored it.
It's not immoral to justify Biden in the face of slander, because slander is wrong. I would not try to justify slander from anyone because it's immoral. It's wrong to want to believe bad about anyone, which is why we shouldn't believe or repeat bad things said about others without any proof. This is why I said up front, "There is a form of wickedness that can be described as wanting to believe bad things about other people, as opposed to wanting to believe good things about other people".
Could you point out the slander regarding Biden? Because pointing out Joe Biden's lies, insults and racism isn't slander, it's exposing evil.