Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Really? So how does memory go from the old atoms to the new atoms.
That is only a problem for you. The question for most people is not if there is eternal life but the details of just what it means to have eternal life. Jesus was resurrected and the disciples thought he was a ghost or pure energy. Jesus ate fish to show that he was not spirit and He had a physical body. When Jesus returns His physical body will return to the earth. That is after the tribulation period.Before we answer that you have to prove there is something after death.
Ya ... well, I've read the Null Hypothesis in Wikipedia 101 times, and I still can't make heads or tails of it. It's nothing but technoblab, as far as I'm concerned.You can't have a hypothesis without the null hypothesis. That's Science 101.
Ya ... well, I've read the Null Hypothesis in Wikipedia 101 times, and I still can't make heads or tails of it. It's nothing but technoblab, as far as I'm concerned.
That is only a problem for you. The question for most people is not if there is eternal life but the details of just what it means to have eternal life. Jesus was resurrected and the disciples thought he was a ghost or pure energy. Jesus ate fish to show that he was not spirit and He had a physical body. When Jesus returns His physical body will return to the earth. That is after the tribulation period.
Ya ... well, I've read the Null Hypothesis in Wikipedia 101 times, and I still can't make heads or tails of it. It's nothing but technoblab, as far as I'm concerned.
And when do you start assuming you are right?The principle is quite simple, you should start anything in science assuming that you are wrong.
So, according to the moon models, there are six different sets of scientists whose evidence tells them they have overcome the null hypothesis?When the evidence (or data) tells you to.
So, according to the moon models, there are six different sets of scientists whose evidence tells them they have overcome the null hypothesis?
And if this null hypothesis is so effective, why isn't it called the Null Law (or Null Theory)?
Why is it still an hypothesis? are they looking for more data?
Ya ... well, I've read the Null Hypothesis in Wikipedia 101 times, and I still can't make heads or tails of it. It's nothing but technoblab, as far as I'm concerned.
The point that Jesus was trying to make was that He is NOT a ghost. That the resurrected body is a physical body. The Bible clearly teaches that the Body we have will be transformed and glorified. That is why they do all the mental gymnastics trying to figure out how to resurrect a body that had been cremated and the ashes scattered to the wind and ocean. Yet still the answer is that NOTHING is impossible with God.How do you know ghosts can't eat fish?
So, according to the moon models, there are six different sets of scientists whose evidence tells them they have overcome the null hypothesis?
And if this null hypothesis is so effective, why isn't it called the Null Law (or Null Theory)?
Why is it still an hypothesis? are they looking for more data?
Your point is what?
It's not that hard to figure out. The null hypothesis is a set of potential observations that either falsify the hypothesis or prevent the hypothesis from being supported.
For example, let's say that I find a loose hair on a murder victim. I collect DNA from both the suspect and the victim and compare them to the DNA from the hair. The hypothesis is that the suspect committed the murder, so a match would confirm the hypothesis. The null hypothesis is a match to the victim or a match to someone who is not the suspect or victim. If the hair is a match to the victim then this satisfies the null hypothesis, but it does not mean that the suspect is innocent. If the hair matches another person who is not the suspect or the victim then this pushes us towards the null hypothesis again, and could falsify the hypothesis.
Capiche?
There are many hypotheses that are falsified by the data. For example, radiometric dating of moon rocks falsifies a recent origin for the moon.
In science, theories are positive statements. To put it generally, "This does that". That's a positive statement. Null hypotheses are not positive statements. They are negative statements in the general form of, "This doesn't do that". Scientists are ultimately interested in the mechanisms that do produce the observed phenomenon, not in mechanisms that have nothing to do with the phenomenon.
Yep, for the hypotheses that have survived testing so far.
Just what is a more traditional doctrine? If our physical body, cremated or otherwise is not resurrected, then just what is resurrected? (Or raptured as the case maybe)1)more traditional interpretation of the Biblical doctrine of the resurrection body.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?