Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Thanks again.
So far, we've seen that Purgatory and intercession from the deceased apparently arose out of Jewish oral tradition and incorporated into the Church.
Are there other similar examples of that? Some easy ones are the clergy/laity split, levitical-type priests, not to open those worm cans, but what others come to mind?
I may be missing something, but why is the 'filioque' and matters of taxis being discussed in a thread about the Theotokos
They are no longer walking among us . They are now in the very Presence of the One who called them.
Paul does talk about a cloud of witnesses while he is talking about faith. Can you tell me though what they are witnesses to?
Heb 12:1 said:Τοιγαροῦν καὶ ἡμεῖς, τοσοῦτον ἔχοντες περικείμενον ἡμῖν νέφος μαρτύρων, ὄγκον ἀποθέμενοι πάντα καὶ τὴν εὐπερίστατον ἁμαρτίαν, δι' ὑπομονῆς τρέχωμεν τὸν προκείμενον ἡμῖν ἀγῶνα,
Ideoque et nos tantam habentes impositam nubem testium, deponentes omne pondus, et circumstans nos peccatum, per patientiam curramus ad propositum nobis certamen:
And therefore we also having so great a cloud of witnesses over our head, laying aside every weight and sin which surrounds us, let us run by patience to the fight proposed to us:
Read that line in context:There is only one who forever lives to intercede for us. That is Christ Jesus my King. We do not read anywhere in the canon that those who pass from this life to the next live to intercede for us. But we do read that Jesus does.
Heb 7:17-28 said:For he testifieth: Thou art a priest for ever, according to the order of Melchisedech. There is indeed a setting aside of the former commandment, because of the weakness and unprofitableness thereof: (For the law brought nothing to perfection,) but a bringing in of a better hope, by which we draw nigh to God. And inasmuch as it is not without an oath, (for the others indeed were made priests without an oath; but this with an oath, by him that said unto him: The Lord hath sworn, and he will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever.) By so much is Jesus made a surety of a better testament. And the others indeed were made many priests, because by reason of death they were not suffered to continue: But this, for that he continueth for ever, hath an everlasting priesthood, whereby he is able also to save for ever them that come to God by him; always living to make intercession for us.
For it was fitting that we should have such a high priest, holy, innocent, undefiled, separated from sinners, and made higher than the heavens; who needeth not daily (as the other priests) to offer sacrifices first for his own sins, and then for the people's: for this he did once, in offering himself. For the law maketh men priests, who have infirmity: but the word of the oath, which was since the law, the Son who is perfected for evermore.
Aquinas said:He shows that he is the true priest, because the others were prevented by death from continuing, because all must die. Hence, when Aaron died, Eleazar succeeded, as is clear from Numbers (20:28) and so on. For as we notice in natural things, which are signs of spiritual things, incorruptible things are not multiplied under the same species; hence, there is but one sun: so in the spiritual things in the Old Testament, which was imperfect, the priests were multiplied. This was a sign that the priesthood was corruptible, because incorruptible things are not multiplied in the same species. But the priest who is Christ is immortal, for He remains forever as the eternal Word of the Father, from Whose eternity redounds an eternity to His body, because 'Christ rising from the dead, dies now no more' (Rom. 6:9). Therefore, because he continues forever, he holds his priesthood permanently. Therefore, Christ alone is the true priest, but others are His ministers: 'Let a man so account of us as the ministers of Christ' (1 Cor. 4:1).
Jn 20:24-29 said:Now Thomas, one of the twelve, who is called Didymus, was not with them when Jesus came. The other disciples therefore said to him: We have seen the Lord. But he said to them: Except I shall see in his hands the print of the nails, and put my finger into the place of the nails, and put my hand into his side, I will not believe.
And after eight days again his disciples were within, and Thomas with them. Jesus cometh, the doors being shut, and stood in the midst, and said: Peace be to you. Then he saith to Thomas: Put in thy finger hither, and see my hands; and bring hither thy hand, and put it into my side; and be not faithless, but believing. Thomas answered, and said to him: My Lord, and my God. Jesus saith to him: Because thou hast seen me, Thomas, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and have believed.
Apoc 5:6 said:And I saw: and behold in the midst of the throne and of the four living creatures, and in the midst of the ancients, a Lamb standing as it were slain, having seven horns and seven eyes: which are the seven Spirits of God, sent forth into all the earth.
Council of Trent said:Et quoniam in divino hoc sacrificio, quod in missa peragitur, idem ille Christus continetur et incruente immolatur, qui in ara crucis semel se ipsum cruente obtulit ... Una enim eademque est hostia, idem nunc offerens sacerdotum ministerio, qui se ipsum tunc in cruce obtulit, sola offerendi ratione diversa.
And forasmuch as, in this divine sacrifice which is celebrated in the mass, that same Christ is contained and immolated in an unbloody manner who once offered himself in a bloody manner on the altar of the cross ... For the victim is one and the same, the same now offering by the ministry of priests, who then offered himself on the cross, the manner alone of offering being different.
Mal 1:11 said:For from the rising of the sun even to the going down, my name is great among the Gentiles, and in every place there is sacrifice, and there is offered to my name a clean oblation: for my name is great among the Gentiles, saith the Lord of hosts.
Orate Fratres said:Orate, fratres: ut meum ac vestrum sacrificium acceptabile fiat apud Deum Patrem omnipotenem.
R: Suscipiat Dominus sacrificium de manibus tuis ad laudem et gloriam nominis sui, ad utilitatem quoque nostram, totiusque Ecclesiae suae sanctae.
Brethren, pray that my sacrifice and yours may be acceptable to God the Father Almighty.
R: May the Lord receive the sacrifice from thy hands for the praise and glory of His name, for our welfare and that of all His holy Church.
1Pe 2:3-5 said:If so be you have tasted that the Lord is sweet. Unto whom coming, as to a living stone, rejected indeed by men, but chosen and made honourable by God: Be you also as living stones built up, a spiritual house, a holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ. ... But you are a chosen generation, a kingly priesthood, a holy nation, a purchased people: that you may declare his virtues, who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light: Who in time past were not a people: but are now the people of God. Who had not obtained mercy; but now have obtained mercy.
Ps 49:14 said:Offer to God the sacrifice of praise: and pay thy vows to the most High. ... The sacrifice of praise shall glorify me: and there is the way by which I will shew him the salvation of God.
Heb 13:15-16 said:By him therefore let us offer the sacrifice of praise always to God, that is to say, the fruit of lips confessing to his name. And do not forget to do good, and to impart; for by such sacrifices God's favour is obtained
Jn 6:31-35 said:Our fathers did eat manna in the desert, as it is written: He gave them bread from heaven to eat. Then Jesus said to them: Amen, amen I say to you; Moses gave you not bread from heaven, but my Father giveth you the true bread from heaven. For the bread of God is that which cometh down from heaven, and giveth life to the world. They said therefore unto him: Lord, give us always this bread. And Jesus said to them: I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall not hunger: and he that believeth in me shall never thirst.
1Cor 10:16-18 said:The chalice of benediction, which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? And the bread, which we break, is it not the partaking of the body of the Lord? For we, being many, are one bread, one body, all that partake of one bread. Behold Israel according to the flesh: are not they, that eat of the sacrifices, partakers of the altar?
Eph 5:2 said:And walk in love, as Christ also hath loved us, and hath delivered himself for us, an oblation and a sacrifice to God for an odour of sweetness.
1Cor 5:7b-8a said:For Christ our pasch is sacrificed. Therefore let us feast.
Ex 30:7-9 said:And Aaron shall burn sweet smelling incense upon it in the morning. When he shall dress the lamps, he shall burn it: And when he shall place them in the evening, he shall burn an everlasting incense before the Lord throughout your generations. You shall not offer upon it incense of another composition nor oblation, and victim, neither shall you offer libations.
And behold a fire, coming forth from the Lord, devoured the holocaust, and the fat that was upon the altar: which when the multitude saw, they praised the Lord, falling on their faces. And Nadab and Abiu, the sons of Aaron, taking their censers, put fire therein, and incense on it, offering before the Lord strange fire: which was not commanded them. And fire coming out from the Lord destroyed them, and they died before the Lord.
Ex 10:25-26 said:Moses said: Thou shalt give us also sacrifices and burnt offerings, to the Lord our God. All the flocks shall go with us: there shall not a hoof remain of them: for they are necessary for the service of the Lord our God: especially as we know not what must be offered, till we come to the very place.
Gen 22:7-8 said:Isaac said to his father: My father. And he answered: What wilt thou, son? Behold, saith he, fire and wood: where is the victim for the holocaust? And Abraham said: God will provide himself a victim for an holocaust, my son. So they went on together.
Let us rejoice, then, and give thanks that we are made not only Christians, but Christ. Do ye understand, brethren, and apprehend the grace of God upon us? Marvel, be glad, we are made Christ. For if He is the head, we are the members: the whole man is He and we.
Eph 1:22-23 said:And he hath subjected all things under his feet, and hath made him head over all the church, which is his body, and the fulness of him who is filled all in all.
Apoc 8:3-4 said:And another angel came, and stood before the altar, having a golden censer; and there was given to him much incense, that he should offer of the prayers of all saints upon the golden altar, which is before the throne of God. And the smoke of the incense of the prayers of the saints ascended up before God from the hand of the angel.
Lk 1:8-11 said:And it came to pass, when he executed the priestly function in the order of his course before God, according to the custom of the priestly office, it was his lot to offer incense, going into the temple of the Lord. And all the multitude of the people was praying without, at the hour of incense. And there appeared to him an angel of the Lord, standing on the right side of the altar of incense.
Prayer and incense necessarily go together. That is why I try to get good incense for my altar and burn it as I say the Offices.May the Lord, by the intercession of blessed Michael the Archangel, who standeth at the right side of the altar of incense, and of all His elect, vouchsafe to bless this incense and receive it as an odor of sweetness; through Christ our Lord. Amen.
May this incense, which Thou hast blessed, O Lord, ascend to Thee, and may Thy mercy descend upon us.
(Ps. 140:2-4)
Let my prayer, O Lord, be directed as incense in Thy sight: the lifting up of my hands as an evening sacrifice. Set a watch, O Lord, before my mouth, and a door round about my lips. Incline not my heart to evil words: to make excuses in sins.
May the Lord enkindle within us the fire of His love, and the flame of everlasting charity. Amen.
I may be missing something, but why is the 'filioque' and matters of taxis being discussed in a thread about the Theotokos
Originally Posted by Standing Up
Coralie--I don't know what you mean by this... I'm hoping you aren't trying to say that I'm not a Christian when I go to Church...Not sure what you are when you go to Church.
Heavens no. Wouldn't have said sister if I'd have thought that.
I just thought it an interesting distinction you made.
Every year on the feast day of St Spyridon, his incorrupt body is carried in a procession around the parish of the church in which his body usually rests. After all of this is finished there is one more thing that is done. His footwear is replaced with new slippers because his old ones have completely worn out, witness to the much traveling done by the saint as he visited sick all over the world, bringing about healing through his intercessions.They are no longer walking among us . They are now in the very Presence of the One who called them.
And you know that Peter's epistle here is by St. Peter how? Much modern Biblical scholarship would query that identification? So, when it comes down to it you only know what is Scripture by the testimony of the same Church which practised marian veneration and intercesssory prayer. That is how the canon and this thread are linked - through the Church which gave us both.We know that the 27 books of the NT are Scripture because the early Church told us it is so.
This keeps being said. The fact is we clearly know that Peter says Paul's letters are scripture. We also know that Paul calls at least Luke scripture.
There is no 'even' and no 'concession' on the saint's part. He stated what the Church in Alexandria had long taught.Even Athanasius in 367 conceded that the 27 books were already given and already divine.
Perhaps banging your head so often hasn't helped you see no one has claimed anything elseNo Council did that. They rubber stamped what was already known and then claimed the authority for it.
Yes, this is how tradition works. But some Churches knew nothing of the letters of James, Jude or II Peter, so who was it decided that all Churches should receive them as genuine? Some Churches included 1 Clement, Barnabas and Hermas, who was it decided that these should be excluded? Many Churches did not receive the Apocalypse of St. John.The Church got a letter from Paul and passed it around. In that sense, they knew what it was. They got a letter from Peter saying it was scripture. Why do folks fight against Peter so much? The gates of hell will not prevail.
It may have been possible for St Maximus to defend the expression "filioque" in the creed at the time, but the declarations by the Council of Florence have amply demonstrated that he could no longer do so today.Photios I of Constantinople (+893, Saint to the EO) attacked the West for the insertion of the word Filioque into the Creed, saying that it constituted heresy. But two centuries earlier, St. Maximus the Confessor (+662) spoke rightly when he explained:
When we say, "qui ex Patre Filioque procedit" -- "Who proceeds from the Father and the Son" we mean nothing new or different from the Eastern Churches (including both those in communion with Rome and those apart) when they do not include that word. We mean simply that "the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father through the Son" which is attested to by Holy Scripture and uncontested.St. Maximus the Confessor said:[T]hey (the Romans) have produced the unanimous documentary evidence of the Latin fathers, and also of Cyril of Alexandria, from the sacred commentary he composed on the gospel of St. John. On the basis of these texts, they have shown that they have not made the Son the cause of the Spirit -- they know in fact that the Father is the only cause of the Son and the Spirit, the one by begetting and the other by procession; but [they use this expression] in order to manifest the Spirits coming-forth (προϊέναιthrough him and, in this way, to make clear the unity and identity of the essence .
The Romans have therefore been accused of things of which it is wrong to accuse them...
I brought up "filioque" as a point of contention between the East and West, yet with a proper understanding, the contention dissolves. This was a response to Standing Up's statement to Anglian that the the different Apostolic Churches believe different things (that they "drew different lines"). My point is that there is nothing of real substance different in our understanding of the Faith once delivered to the Apostles. Even the Nestorian Church has signed joint declarations of faith on Christology.
At least half the problems seem to arise, as St. Maximillian the Confessor points out in the passage I quoted (or perhaps right after that, I don't want to go back and look...), with translation issues. He points out that the contention with filioque is really a contention over the proper Greek translation of the Latin word procedit, which can translate into two different Greek words -- one problematic, one orthodox.
Similarly, the word hypostases as used by the Greeks was contended against by the Latins, who originally translated it as substantia. While they both mean "to stand beneath", the implications differ and so the Latins accused the Greeks of heresy, saying that the Three Persons were of different "substances". The preferred Latin word was personae (hence the English "Persons"). Likewise, in the Christological contentions, the Nestorian Church (Assyrian Church of the East) argued against the Greeks and Latins, preferring their own word qnome to refer to each of Christ's "natures".
Thus the three sacred languages on the Cross -- Hebrew, Greek and Latin (Syriac is a Semetic language, so it connects) -- don't always translate well between each other. Language barriers, miscommunication and ignorance/prejudice has caused more contention between the Apostolic Churches than has anything of real substance.
Thus, Standing Up is wrong to say that he can re-create a more pure system of Christianity through his re-creations of what he thinks that the early Church was like. It is not a matter of "these people stop here", "those people stop there", that is to suppose that the Church is a dead thing. It is also to suppose that the faith could change, as though it were not set in stone. The Deposit of Faith (Holy Scripture and Holy Tradition) are certainly concrete. But the way in which that faith is applied to the present situations is what makes the Church a living organism, the Body and Bride of Christ. The Church can never be a set of dogmas apart from the Apostolic faith because then it would be a work of the flesh and not of the spirit, a work of man and not of God. The Liturgy is the union of the work of God and the work of the people.
I hope you get what I am trying to say. However, I have no idea what you mean by "taxis"
Not missed. It is apparently not in a form (poetic, of a much earlier era) that you are familiar with.
To pray for another requires compassion from the other, likewise it is merciful to pray for another. To pray for another - to even 'stand in the gap' and pray to God on behalf of another - is an act of mercy and compassion, is sheltering. Her prayers for others (as are yours, for ex.) are an act borne of love, compassion, mercy, sheltering. The prayers of the righteous are strong (see the Epistle of James). To be pure and blessed in the sight of God is equated with righteousness. (Likewise, the prayers of Moses are strong.) The use of the term "only" is a poetic rendering, used as a superlative or emphatic. We are delivered by the prayers of others; we are exhorted to pray for others.
Back to an example of supposed 'request for prayer'---
Originally Posted by Standing Up The date of copy is disputed.Understood the intercession.
Two translations:
Beneath your compassion,
We take refuge, O Mother of God:
do not despise our petitions in time of trouble:
but rescue us from dangers,
only pure, only blessed one.
Beneath thy mercy,
we take refuge, O Virgin Theotokos:
disdain not our supplications in our distress,
but deliver us from perils,
O only pure and blessed one.
Where exactly is the request for prayer?
Now where exactly is that request in the sub tuum? IOW, it looks not like this: Thekla, please pray for me. But like this, I take refuge under Thekla.
Beneath thy (Thekla) mercy we take refuge. Instead of per the Psalms, we take refuge under God.
I explained in my previous post; if there is a particular statement in my post that doesn't make sense, let me know and I will try to give a better explanation.
As a parallel, the Psalmist also attests that the Jews were shepherded by the hands Moses and Aaron, yet Christ is the true shepherd.
Likewise, God looks for one who will "stand in the gap" (Ezekiel 22); the Psalmist attests that Moses did "stand in the gap" (in this case interceded - Psalm 106). Also in Psalm 106, the Psalmist records that Phineas pleaded with God on behalf of the Jews - and the plague was stopped.
Allof these (shepherding, interceding, pleading) are forms of sheltering. Moses interceded for God's mercy - which is itself an act of mercy.
Again, understand the 'stand in the gap'.
Where is that in the sub tuum?
Psalm 106, take refuge in the LORD. Versus, sub tuum, take refuge in Mary.
It is another way to say the same thing - poetic language.
Take refuge in her intercessions. Through the entreaty/intercession of Phineas, the Jews were sheltered from the plague.
Not talking about that stuff, but about this example 250-350 of a prayer to Mary. Where is the intercession, as opposed to the stopping at Mary?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?