Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
When I connect the dots I see an embarrassing display of so called news outlets and journalists snookered by extreme leftists who wished their own press were true.Well, that's not the case, it seems...
White House and Justice Dept. Officials Discussed Mueller Report Before Release
I don't think that's going to work for you. Barr and Trump were colluding over report.
And we don't know yet what Mueller reported. All we know is that Barr and Trump are inexplicably reluctant to let anyone other than the WH know what's in it. He's apparently hoping that he'll be able to refuse Congress even a redacted copy.
And now, no more talk about exoneration. I think you can connect the dots. Let's see how much Barr decides to hide from the public.
Nixon did not get hammered for claiming executive privilege.I'm supposing that someone told him what happened when Nixon tried that one.
So Mueller is now complicit in the conspiracy to cover for Trump?In an extensive 448-page report sent to Congress Thursday, the former FBI director detailed dozens of instances in which Russian operatives interacted with Trump associates, although he ultimately found no evidence that the campaign worked with Russia in the end.
So there was a conspiracy between the media and Democrats to frame Trump?Conspiracy also resembles attempt. However, attempt, like solicitation, can be committed by a single person. On another level, conspiracy requires less than attempt. A conspiracy may exist before a crime is actually attempted, whereas no attempt charge will succeed unless the requisite attempt is made.
The thing is that "intent" is hard to prove beyond a reasonable doubt and prosecutors are reluctant to take a case to trial without hard evidence. Mueller seems to say that doesn't exist. Trump did a lot of unethical things but that doesn't mean illegal.Thank you both for taking the time to deal with my ignoranceI think I heard him say there was not enough proof; yet, if he says he is sure there was "intent", I think this can be prosecutable.
Close. It is illegal to threaten to kill someone. More like a drug sting. Money has to change hands before the buyer does something illegal.A maybe different thing, for example, is if you yell you're going to kill someone, and then you start to move toward that person, they can get you for intent to commit murder.
The account given is actually opposite. The Russian lawyer (who did work for a law firm associated with Fusion GPS aka the Clinton front for the dossier) offered dirt. And Jr did not bite.As an example, the Trump Tower meeting. Junior went to the meeting seeking dirt on Clinton. The lawyer didn't have any but wanted to make a deal regarding adoption. Trump left, so nothing illegal occurred, though the meeting was unethical.
Nixon got "hammered" over the White House tapes which contained the "smoking gun" of him providing prior knowledge of criminal activity!Nixon did not get hammered for claiming executive privilege.
How did knowledge of the tapes become known? That is what got him hammered.Nixon got "hammered" over the White House tapes which contained the "smoking gun" of him providing prior knowledge of criminal activity!
Nixon tried to claim "executive privilege" concerning the tapes, but that was overruled by the Courts!
If that was the case, why did Trump Sr, on his flight home from Europe, invent the "cover story" that the meeting was about Russian adoptions - if this President's surrogates had been conducting themselves in a honourable manner, why the need to lie and mislead the American public?The account given is actually opposite. The Russian lawyer (who did work for a law firm associated with Fusion GPS aka the Clinton front for the dossier) offered dirt. And Jr did not bite.
NIXON TAPESHow did knowledge of the tapes become known? That is what got him hammered.
Nope, not the opposite. I never said who offered first. Junior still went looking for dirt. This is collusion but it's not illegal since nothing illegal occurred at the meeting.The account given is actually opposite. The Russian lawyer (who did work for a law firm associated with Fusion GPS aka the Clinton front for the dossier) offered dirt. And Jr did not bite.
Who said he invented a story? That’s another made up false narrative. To get in the door the Fusion GPS agent on the Clinton campaign dollar made the claim she wanted to speak about orphans.If that was the case, why did Trump Sr, on his flight home from Europe, invent the "cover story" that the meeting was about Russian adoptions - if his surrogates were conducting themselves in a honourable manner, why the need to lie and mislead the American public?
Yes who knew that?The investigators received word that President Nixon was in the habit of secretly recording his conversations in the White House - they placed the WH individual responsible for the tapes before the Senate Committee and he confirmed their existence!
The only evidence of anyone digging up dirt is HRC campaign hiring a retired SAS intelligence officer who used his RUSSIAN contacts to create the Trump dossier.Nope, not the opposite. I never said who offered first. Junior still went looking for dirt. This is collusion but it's not illegal since nothing illegal occurred at the meeting.
Lol. You haven't kept up with this have. Trump admitted going to the meeting looking for info on Clinton. They admitted that none was there.The only evidence of anyone digging up dirt is HRC campaign hiring a retired SAS intelligence officer who used his RUSSIAN contacts to create the Trump dossier.
Jr wanting to get dirt on Hillary is purely leftist media speculation. One of those elements of wishful thinking which was again a media false narrative.
Who set up the meeting and what was their motive and reason to meet?Lol. You haven't kept up with this have. Trump admitted going to the meeting looking for info on Clinton. They admitted that none was there.
Well, that's not the case, it seems...
White House and Justice Dept. Officials Discussed Mueller Report Before Release
I don't think that's going to work for you. Barr and Trump were colluding over report.
And we don't know yet what Mueller reported. All we know is that Barr and Trump are inexplicably reluctant to let anyone other than the WH know what's in it. He's apparently hoping that he'll be able to refuse Congress even a redacted copy.
And now, no more talk about exoneration. I think you can connect the dots. Let's see how much Barr decides to hide from the public.
I've definitely noticed the wording Barr used. He seems to be playing to the White House instead of legalese. Collusion isn't the term which prosecutors use. Conspiracy is.
There was definitely collusion but it doesn't seem to have risen to the point of criminal conspiracy.
Who cares? It makes no difference. There was no evidence on Clinton. The meeting was a bust.Who set up the meeting and what was their motive and reason to meet?
I don't know. No evidence exists that anyone "manufactured" evidence. Russians hacked the DNC. Some was leaked. Christopher Steele accumulated info on Trump's dealings with Russia. Some was verified and some wasn't.Who actually hired an agency to hire a foreign spy to contact Russians to manufacture dirt on a political opponent during an election?
What they did wasn't illegal.What the HRC and DNC actually did is what Trump was accused of.
Yes.Sure Russia leaked out information on Hillary and the DNC. Illegal yes, but would you be perusing such a passionate investigation if they had done something similar to Trump and the RNC?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?