Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The Thadman said:I believe that you are misguided in this particular issue, and I have stated my reasons why.
Shlomo,
-Steve-o
Hix said:I believe Im not misguided on this issue and I havent seen any reasons why. HaShem gave the Rabbis the authority regardless if it DID come from Sinai or not, which indeed it did. its funny that you did not combat this arguement with any text from the Bible to back you up, your opinion is fine and dandy but the Bible says otherwise.
Im too tired to counter your other remarks but I will do so in the morning. Untill then might I advise you read perhaps Michael Levi or a few other JEWISH scholars on this matter?
Shalom and G-d bless
~Hix~
Just a thought that came to mind when I read your post:The Thadman said:"Which Mishnah?" is the question. For example, the Mishnah in the Talmud represents many differing (often diametrically opposed) opinions that banter back and forth without any final decision.
I personally feel that the Oral Traditions (which are very relevant in any talk of Kosher) break the Torah's declaration never to add or subtract from God's Word, as (for example) we are told "do not eat a goat-kid boiled in its mother's milk" to "you may not eat any meat and any milk together whatsoever" to some traditions which state "you MUST have separate kitchens for meat and milk." The milk and meat are going to the same place (your stomach), it's just that when you boil a goat kid in its mother's milk, it'll mess with your body's chemical balance.
I know that there are many people who claim that the Oral Traditions date back to Sinai, but there is no record of them. The claims of Oral Tradition dating from Sinai date back to a time after Ezra, and absolutely nothing exists before then.
Shlomo,
-Steve-o
The Thadman said:Deuteronomy isn't scripture? Exodus isn't scripture? Revelation isn't scripture? Zechariah isn't scripture?
What Tanak are you reading?
The Thadman said:What is this, anti-NON-semiticism? In following YHWH am I separate from the Jews?
What gives?
The Thadman said:Furthermore, PLEASE tell me why Abib is no longer the first month of the Jewish calendar according to Oral Law
The Thadman said:What's confusing here?
#1) Read how this is phrased: "And thou shalt bind them for a sign upon thine hand, and they shall be as frontlets between thine eyes."
We don't see the normal word for tying a knot here, but the word "to strengthen." So we're to strengthen his words upon our hands as a sign. Our actions.
They will be LIKE frontlets between your eyes. God never commanded Tefillin, yet this verse is verbatim in 4 of the 5 books of Torah (except Exodus 13:9 uses the term "memorial/in your memory" instead of "frontlets").
This entire verse, as I can see it, flows from the verse that comes at the beginning:
6 These words, which I command you this day, shall be on your heart;
Does this mean that we need to have surgery to implant them into our chest or brain? NO. We're to follow him in thought, and in deed.
#2) There is no archeological evidence to support Tefillin until thousands of years after Sinai.
#3) The forehead and hand is used figuratively throughout the Bible to indicate both thought and deed.
The Thadman said:There is no such thing as a "kosher slaughter" in TorahThe commands are listed right there in the same chapter. Don't eat the blood, can't be an unclean animal, etc. all defined within Torah.
The Thadman said:#1) The Hebrew LITTERALLY reads, "and gave an interpretation," or "and gave insight" (no definite article). I don't see any mention of Mishnah or Gemara, anywhere.
#2) Notice how they SEPERATED (the word "distinctly") the interpretation from the Torah. This insight was not Torah.
#3) If this were the Oral Torah, it's described as Ezra's interpretation. In other words it SURE as hell didn't come from Sinai.
This is a very tenuous argument, Hix.
The Thadman said:I don't see an Oral Torah at work here.
3 Now therefore let us make a covenant with our God to put away all the wives, and such as are born of them, according to the counsel of my lord, and of those who tremble at the commandment of our God; and let it be done according to the law.
There is a BIG separation here. The children being put away is at the counsel of Ezra, NOT God, NOT the Torah. The crowd wanted it to be done in accordance with the Torah as well, and this was brought up separately.
This is not helping your case.
The Thadman said:This COMPLETELY goes against what you're saying! God said that the four FASTS the Rabbim ordained were WRONG and turned them into FEASTS. God did NOT like their tradition because they were afflicting themselves, so what did he do? He picked them up, dusted them off and said, DON'T TO IT AGAIN.
The Thadman said:They were to pass judgment based on the Law of Moses, not their own oral traditions. Their words could not supersede God's Torah. Again this does not help your case.
I have no intention of entering this debate, but I will say that the above statement isn't entirely true. Give me a few minutes, and I'll get back to you on it.As you admitted yourself, there is no details on kosher slaughter in the Torah, only commands to do it,
1. No domesticated animals (bull, goat, sheep) may be slaughtered except as a sacrifice. The sacrificial flesh may be eaten but only in a state of ritual purity. The blood must be poured out on the altar. (Lev 17:3-12)
2. Wild animals (e.g. deer, gazelle) and birds may be killed anywhere and eaten as non-sacrifice while in a state of ritual impurity. The blood must be spilled on the ground and covered with earth. (Lev 17:13-14)
3. When you are far from the chosen place (Tabernacle, Temple) you may slaughter domesticated animals as non-sacrifices. The blood must be spilled "on the ground like water", i.e. not on an altar outside the Temple. (Dt 12:13-27)
4. Sacrifices must still be brought to the Temple, even if you are far away and the blood spilled on the altar. (Dt 12:13-27)
"Our Rabbis taught, Based on three things is the year intercalated: on the Abib, on the fruits of the trees, and on the equinox. Based on two of them the year is intercalated but based on one of them alone the year is not intercalated. And when the Abib is one of them everyone is pleased." (Bavli Sanhedrin 11b)
We see here that there were 3 factors used to determine when the year begins:
1) The Abib;
2) The Fruits of the Trees; and
3) the Vernal Equinox.
If 2 of the 3 factors indicated a 13th month must be added, the year was made a leap year. But all recognized that Abib is most important factor and when Abib was one of the 2 deciding factors all were happy.
Im sure Im going to get countered with an arguement of some kind so Il mention also that Abib in mishnaic hebrew was not a season as it is in modern hebrew, it is used many other times and refers to an agricultural term which describes ripening barley
Thats interesting, but why did you seemingly ignore when I wrote that phylacteries are mentioned in the New Testament? How would you and your archeology explain that without inadvertantly calling the Brit Hadasha uninspired? If HaShem didnt mean for tefflin or tallitot then why is it later mentioned in the Bible and why did Yeshua himself don them? The only place you can find the detail on this is in the Oral Torah, the saducees did not follow oral law and look how confused they were, they nailed their Tallitot to the wall and were so confused regarding Shabbat laws they did not even get up at all. Without the Oral law there would be a million confused ideals of what this verse means, including yours, but as we see the Bible records the usage of Tefflin
Could you watch your language please?
I do note that you noticed the strong possibility that this could very well be the Oral Torah, you seem to forget that it probobly wasnt written down at any point by now so there would be no such thing as Mishnah or Gemara, it is simply the Oral tradition for interperation of the Law. I believe it did come from Sinai, but as I said whether it did or didnt doesnt take away that HaShem gives it full authority.
So, the Torah had it that the means of rectifying the situation of a Jew intermarrying is to not only cut off the gentile wife, but also cut off the children as well. The Written Torah is but only the beginning. The Oral Torah completes it. They are inseparable companions.
If it was done at the council of Exra then it would have been a change to the Torah for you becuase you do not accept Oral Torah. Did you ever consider that their decision might have been influenced by the Oral tradition passed from Sinai in interperating laws such as this?
Why didnt you give us all a quote so we could see were indeed HaShem does that? The rabbinical authorities of the time ordained that the Jewish people fast on those days to commemorate these events, those being the breaching of the walls of Jerusalem (Fast of Tammuz), the destruction of the Temple (Tisha B'Av), the assassination of Gedaliah (Fast of Gedaliah), and the beginning of the siege of Jerusalem (Fast of Tevet). But this verse clearly indicates that G-d DID approve of the fasts, so were did they get their authority to ordain these fasts?
So thats a partial admission that HaShem has given the Rabbi's the authority to create something as this based around G-ds Torah? Their words did not superceed G-ds if they did make it up, and if they did then the Bible clearly indicates it is binding anyway.
Like I said in Dueteronomy 30 HaShem says the Torah is not in heaven, it is WITH us, the Jewish people have been chosen out of all the nations to be his holy nation and preserve his holy scriptures and to interperate them. There is nowhere that the Talmud conflicts with the Torah if read correctly, the two are companions, had G-d just given us the written Torah then there would be millenia of arguing and bickering and worse of all people not fulfilling G-ds law becuase they arent sure how to. That is why HaShem gave instructions and an explaination to the people, makes sence no?
9 Yahweh your God will make you plenteous in all the work of your hand, in the fruit of your body, and in the fruit of your cattle, and in the fruit of your ground, for good: for Yahweh will again rejoice over you for good, as he rejoiced over your fathers;
10 if you shall obey the voice of Yahweh your God, to keep his commandments and his statutes which are written in this book of the Torah; if you turn to Yahweh your God with all your heart, and with all your soul.
Like I said "Whatever direction that took the society in was therefore correct provided they didn't step outside existing law from Sinai" and whatever direction they took IS binding according to the Bible. So even if they DID make it up, the Bible gives it the authority ANYWAY. You have failed to present any scripture or arguements to the contrary.
8 If there arise a matter too hard for you in judgment, between bloodshed and bloodshed, between plea and plea, and between wound and wound, being matters of controversy within your gates[/b]; then shall you arise, and go up to the place which Yahweh your God shall choose;
Deut 17:2
2 If there be found in the midst of you, within any of your gates which Yahweh your God gives you, man or woman, who does that which is evil in the sight of Yahweh your God, in transgressing his covenant,
3 and has gone and served other gods, and worshiped them, or the sun, or the moon, or any of the host of the sky, which I have not commanded;
4 and it be told you, and you have heard of it, then shall you inquire diligently; and, behold, if it be true, and the thing certain, that such abomination is done in Israel,
5 then shall you bring forth that man or that woman, who has done this evil thing, to your gates, even the man or the woman; and you shall stone them to death with stones.
6 At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses, shall he who is to die be put to death; at the mouth of one witness he shall not be put to death.
7 The hand of the witnesses shall be first on him to put him to death, and afterward the hand of all the people. So you shall put away the evil from the midst of you.
Deut 17:11
11 according to the tenor of the law which they shall teach you, and according to the judgment which they shall tell you, you shall do; you shall not turn aside from the sentence which they shall show you, to the right hand, nor to the left.
12 The man who does presumptuously, in not listening to the priest who stands to minister there before Yahweh your God, or to the judge, even that man shall die: and you shall put away the evil from Israel.
13 All the people shall hear, and fear, and do no more presumptuously.
On a final note I hope I have not come across forcefull or even insulting as I gathered from your last point, I certainly didnt mean to and I hope you can forgive me
Shalom and G-d bless!
~Hix~
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?