The Sandy Hook Shooting - Fully Exposed

pgp_protector said:

You all know, you can post larger images to make the thread even more misformatted
I've got a 10,000 X 10,000 pixel image if needed.

Click to expand...

Wait! A conspiracy to make the thread misformatted! Tell me more!

Heehee. I got all those images from a Google Images search. If you know of a way to re-size them without having to use an editor and upload to a hosting website, let me know and I'll do it.

As a woman, a regular user of photoshop, and an artist who constantly studies human anatomy from both medical text books and instructions on human proportions and drawing the skeleton, I feel qualified to say that whoever originally drew these conclusions from this photo is an idiot of startling proportions.

I happen to be sitting in almost that exact pose right now, and I assure you it is possible. What you think is the continuation of her leg is actually her sweater bunched up over her hip. There's no cut away on her skirt, merely a highlight, and her finger is perfectly normal--you are mistaking a bit of shadow under her finger for a continuation of the finger itself.

Click to expand...

I agree, I never got behind anything on that photo and I don't understand why. Everyone knows girls are more flexible and can bend and twist their bodies to pose for a picture, this is just more distracting misinformation to keep people from looking at actual proof.

In regards to the google search results, im talking about the pages that are raising funds for victims of the shooting, not just some regular donation sites. One entry reads:

Coverage of the Newtown, Connecticut school shooting | WRKO.com

www.wrko.com/coverage-newtown-connecticut-school-shooting
Dec 11, 2012 - Sandy Hook School Support Fund (set up by the United Way of Western Connecticut). For more information and to donate online, click here; Check donations ...

My company does SEO and we have some guys that are pretty good at it. I am waiting for someone who is so good that they can get search engine exposure traveling back in time, that's the guy who i want to hire.

seeking Christ said:

No no, you can't! The picture was taken at 7:57, so if your clocks were only off by 1 hour that still means the picture was taken at 8:57 - well before the tragedy at Sandy Hook.

Nevermind that neither of those posts have anything to do with the mass shooting. Police leading a handcuffed man out of the woods? What's that got to do with it? One Police car parked in the school parking lot? Yeah, we know a cop was stationed there, with his marked car. It's got absolutely nothing to do with the mass shooting.

Click to expand...

Yes I can. I've confirmed it, I am now logged into my Twitter account, my time zone is set to Eastern, my system clock is set to Eastern. It is showing as 10:57am. I was wrong on the time, because I forgot that I was not logged into Twitter so my timezone settings did not apply. I always approach every piece of evidence with doubt, I try to poke holes in it. I can't stand behind the posts after discovering this. The only thing they have to do with the shooting at this point is that there is a suspect seated in the front of a police car, other than that their meaningless.

I'm never afraid to admit when i'm wrong.

guitarmonster said:

The only thing they have to do with the shooting at this point is that there is a suspect seated in the front of a police car, other than that their meaningless.

Click to expand...

What was that suspect, suspected of doing? Anything to do with the mass shooting, or something completely different?

Calvinator said:

Wait! A conspiracy to make the thread misformatted! Tell me more!

Heehee. I got all those images from a Google Images search. If you know of a way to re-size them without having to use an editor and upload to a hosting website, let me know and I'll do it.

Click to expand...

One way to handle large image is the Spoiler Tag, works wonders.

[spoiler=Large image] Post Image In This Spot[/spoiler]
Becomes

seeking Christ said:

What was that suspect, suspected of doing? Anything to do with the mass shooting, or something completely different?

Click to expand...

When police arrived, they indicated over the radio that they we're pursuing multiple suspects. They also had a few officers call in that they took suspects into custody. It is believed that this man is one of them from eyewitness testimony who said he was wearing camo pants and a dark jacket saying "it wasn't me" while being taken to the police car. I don't know exactly what they we're suspected of. All I know is they we're running from the police and usually only guilty people do that.

pgp_protector said:

One way to handle large image is the Spoiler Tag, works wonders.

[spoiler=Large image] Post Image In This Spot[/spoiler]
Becomes

Spoiler: Large image

Post Image In This Spot

Click to expand...

Thanks! And done! Misformatting Conspiracy debunked!

guitarmonster said:

Everyone knows girls are more flexible and can bend and twist their bodies to pose for a picture

Click to expand...

Some of us are rather familiar with all the ways the female form can (and cannot) bend, and that pic is quite simply a hoax with regards to where her right leg is, especially with reference to her left hip and the relationship of her upper body to her lower.

It still means a grand total of NOTHING as far as the gruesome details of what might be described as the worst tragedy this Nation has seen in quite some time, and the only where 20 children so young were shot like fish in a barrel.

But by all means, if you feel inclined to pursue possible corruption, God speed to you. I don't see how it could hurt as long as you are responsible with information you gather. I'd also like to see people able to use the forum as a sounding board, without everyone attacking with ridicule so quickly. The fact is, for everyone issue that someone gets labeled a conspiracy freak over, there is an event that is truly difficult to process.

guitarmonster said:

When police arrived, they indicated over the radio that they we're pursuing multiple suspects. They also had a few officers call in that they took suspects into custody. It is believed that this man is one of them from eyewitness testimony who said he was wearing camo pants and a dark jacket saying "it wasn't me" while being taken to the police car. I don't know exactly what they we're suspected of. All I know is they we're running from the police and usually only guilty people do that.

Click to expand...

Ok lets suppose all that is true, and lets suppose the pic was taken after the mass shooting. Does that add up to this particular pic being of a suspect in this particular crime?

Now if you were the Police answering a call like that, would you assume there was only one possible shooter? On what basis? I think it could be considered dereliction of duty to take it easy once your buddy found one likely suspect. They didn't have the benefit of hindsight, and the confusion you accurately note amongst the reporters is due to the confusion about the facts on the scene. Or so it seems to me.

That little detail of the school nurse being 2 places at one time might be worth following up on, but if she wasn't a shooter it may well turn out to be just an honest mistake. A more valid line of inquiry would be to establish where Adam Lanza's body was found, when it was transported, and where to. And of course what weapons were on his person, and ballistic reports.

PreachersWife2004 said:

Um, no.

It's applied to people who come up with crackpot theories about things simply because they can't accept things at face value. They look for agendas where there isn't any.

I don't buy into everything media tells me, but I don't smell a conspiracy every time there's inconsistencies.

Click to expand...

Not a conspiratorialist, but Obama did mention gun control within two minutes of his televised Newtown speech, which would speak to agenda.

Along with the Patriot Act, NDAA, TSA, and now your 2nd. Amendment being severely restricted, I can see why some might "connect the dots."

katsung47 said:

The Sandy Hook Shooting - Fully Exposed

The Sandy Hook Shooting - Fully Exposed - YouTube

Click to expand...

Thank you for thank. The videos were awesome and served to reinforce my distrust for our government. I will be living in a compound soon!

Worst tragedy. How about all of the parents of the poor children killed overseas by Obama's drone strikes. What would happen to our televisions if every one of those deaths got this same type of coverage? Just to think that we over here suspect things are going on from our government, and those overseas who get hit head on probably know who is at fault. But nobody cares about them. I've even seen people smile and actually say they support it, which in my mind is really sick to support the innocent taking of life. I really hate how Obama surrounds himself with children too. If I we're a parent I would not want my kid anywhere near him.

But by all means, if you feel inclined to pursue possible corruption, God speed to you. I don't see how it could hurt as long as you are responsible with information you gather.

Click to expand...

I will tell you honestly that I don't want to live in a world with corruption like this. I wish that I could close my eyes and it would just go away. The only reason why I ever pick something like this apart is that I see blatant evidence of corruption. I also see that the government is using this as a catalyst to further their attack on the 2nd Amendment, and i can tell you that America is not going to stand for it. We have too many patriots in this country. They need to back this thing off and open up the discussion to all options to protect the people. Instead their just trying to ram through legislation to restrict law abiding citizens, which makes no sense. I live right next to Camden, NJ which is a city where citizens are not allowed to carry. Their crime is through the roof, those poor people like in constant fear for their lives and it's not fair to them. The criminals literally run the streets because they do not follow the law. I have no idea why so many people seem to be against willing teachers to get trained and carry concealed. We have trusted them for so long, all of a sudden they can't be trusted? Talk about a way that would have such a minimal impact costwise since the teachers are already being paid to be there, no additional salaries for security officers. Security officers and cops in schools only makes the school seem like a prison, where concealed carry teachers would not really change the mood. I would think that parents would actually feel better knowing its in the hands of teachers that they have grown to trust over the years. Bring in security guards who knows, you would be surprised how many of those professional security guards end up getting arrested at one point. My God I hope I never have to see another school massacre. If anything is going to happen I would rather the headline read "Man with a gun kicks in front door of school, killed within a minute by two teachers".

Then there's this video.

Gene Rosen Witness of Sandy Hook Shooting Caught Lying! Part One - YouTube

And this 3rd. grader didn't answer if she heard gun shots when asked.

3rd-Grade Witness Saw Children Screaming At Sandy Hook Elementary - YouTube

seeking Christ said:

Ok lets suppose all that is true, and lets suppose the pic was taken after the mass shooting. Does that add up to this particular pic being of a suspect in this particular crime?

Click to expand...

Yes it does, that picture is from the scene at Sandy Hook. The twitter post is commented by a member of the media, they are discussing it. She indicates that they didn't know who the suspect was and was going to get back to them on it, eventually the reporter stopped responding. Let me be clear here, i have listened to the police audio many times. Upon arrival the police we're chasing multiple suspects, this was the very first thing they did upon arrival. They we're told by the dispatcher that the caller seen two shadows running past the gym at the rear of the building. This is corroborated by the helicopter footage of the chase. On top of that, multiple officers call in to report pursuing and apprehending suspects. The key thing is they we're taken into custody, or legally what you would consider to be "detained". Since this is an active shooter call, even if the officers do release someone they have detained, they are going to take that person's information. I honestly do not think any information exists about those people, but that is just a feeling at this point. If you go on youtube and pull up a recording of the police radio, you will see very quickly that the media is way off on their story. You also hear them calling in when they found the weapons. Remember that officers are going to actively call everything in. If an officer walks in a room and sees a handgun, he's going to call in "i've got a handgun here". The reason why people like me are looking into this is because the police radio audio is highly contradictory to the official story that is being released directly by the Connecticut State Police representative Lt Paul Vance.

Calvinator said:

It means something's awry. What that is exactly, is still up in the air at this point. Drawing the conclusion that she never existed is not what I'm doing. What I am saying is that photo-shopping, such as is clear below, indicates a lack of photos, or at least, a lack of photos when the news first came out. That could mean lots of things.

Here's the same photo that outlines the problem on the photo:

Click to expand...

This is too good. I thought the thread would have to drop off after the initial videos, but this is getting better and better. I am especially a fan of the index finger!

FrenchyBearpaw said:

And this 3rd. grader didn't answer if she heard gun shots when asked.

Click to expand...

I agree with you. It seems kind of like the kids we're told what to say, just a feeling. I noticed on kid said he heard gunshots, but they didn't sound like Army gunshots, or police gunshots or ammo control gunshots. Such a weird thing to say.

guitarmonster said:

I agree with you. It seems kind of like the kids we're told what to say, just a feeling. I noticed on kid said he heard gunshots, but they didn't sound like Army gunshots, or police gunshots or ammo control gunshots. Such a weird thing to say.

Click to expand...

There a few things that just don't sit well with me and would welcome any insight.

For instance, there are 27 dead, with only one or two wounded (I haven't seen them interviewed), with over two hundred shots fired, and yet, not one ounce of blood is visible anywhere outside the school.

I never saw any bodies removed from the school.

There is a news clip interviewing a parent and child at the school, and across the street are two construction workers working away as if nothing just happened one hundred yards away.

This Gene Rosen character is simply unbelievable... he had six kids for almost two hours and he didn't call anyone?

The interview with the coroner is a train wreck... watch if you haven't already.

I remember as the Columbine tragedy unfolded in the news, and it had a completely different vibe to it, as in, it seemed real intuitively, where SH doesn't.

Just my 2 cents.

Here's the same photo that outlines the problem on the photo:

Click to expand...

Now that I look at it again zoomed in with Photoshop I see what you are saying. When your zoomed out it doesn't stick out as much but zoomed in you know it's impossible. It's like her left leg is attached at the center of her torso and her right leg is just sitting on the rock next to her. The jacket and skirt make it a little harder to see. I wonder if i'm gonna see this girls face in one of these family photos I have.

I just don't know what to make of this.

Robbie Parker Fake Actor Sandy Hook Shooting - YouTube