The problem with "Every man is a potential rapist"

Gadarene · Oct 31, 2016

Zoii said:
It is a out me... i expressed how I feel and Im not asking you or anyone to feel the same way and so fine just keep attacking

It's a correction. That you choose to see it as an attack is your issue, not mine.

Come on. If you turned up somewhere and said "hey I just plain don't feel comfortable about black people when they walk past me in the street", people would be a lot more critical of you than I'm being now, age be darned. It isn't any less of a wrong thing to say just because it's directed at everyone's favourite punching bag, men.

Zoii · Oct 31, 2016

Gadarene said:
Yeah, and I doubt you've ever been feared simply for walking down the street minding your own business. What of it?

The what of it is you havent been raped. So your in a nice position to be smug and criticize but ill stick to staying the hell away from men

Gadarene · Oct 31, 2016

Zoii said:
The what of it us you havent been raped. So your in a nice position to be smug and criticize but ill stick to staying the hell away from men

You don't know that I haven't. What are you basing that claim on?

Zoii · Oct 31, 2016

Gadarene said:
It's a correction. That you choose to see it as an attack is your issue, not mine.

Come on. If you turned up somewhere and said "hey I just plain don't feel comfortable about black people when they walk past me in the street", people would be a lot more critical of you than I'm being now, age be darned. It isn't any less of a wrong thing to say just because it's directed at everyone's favourite punching bag, men.

I didnt mention black people n u know it

Gadarene · Oct 31, 2016

Zoii said:
The what of it is you havent been raped. So your in a nice position to be smug and criticize but ill stick to staying the hell away from men

When I was assaulted, what I didn't do was treat all people of the same gender, race, economic background as people to be feared by default.

And yes, I had to work on that. Do the same.

Zoii · Oct 31, 2016

Gadarene said:
You don't know that I haven't. What are you basing that claim on?

Ok i can see that your just enjoying yourself at my expense... nice work

Gadarene · Oct 31, 2016

Zoii said:
I didnt mention black people n u know it

You do know what an analogy is, right?

Gadarene · Oct 31, 2016

Zoii said:
Ok i can see that your just enjoying yourself at my expense... nice work

No, I'm completely serious. How do you know I haven't been? Just because I challenged your bigotry?

Zoii · Oct 31, 2016

Gadarene said:
You do know what an analogy is, right?

Gadarene said:
When I was assaulted, what I didn't do was treat all people of the same gender, race, economic background as people to be feared by default.

And yes, I had to work on that. Do the same.

I told you ... i am working on it.... I stay away from men.

Gadarene · Oct 31, 2016

Zoii said:
I told you ... i am working on it.... I stay away from men.

That's not working on it. That's giving in.

Zoii · Oct 31, 2016

Zoii said:
I told you ... i am working on it.... I stay away from men.

No its protecting myself and what I need to do.

RDKirk · Oct 31, 2016

KTS said:
If I had a bowl of candy, and one of them was laced with a poison that would kill you, you would look at every candy in that bowl as potential poison. It is not a statement about the candy, but about how you must look at the candy if you want to protect yourself.

As a woman, I have to look at every man I encounter as someone who could be a rapist. I know that the vast majority of men are not, but the point is that I can't tell. And since the magnitude of the outcome is rather extreme, I have to take precautions to protect myself against it. If I let my guard down, then horrible things could happen to me.

So when people say, "every man is a potential rapist," it is not saying that all men could commit rape. It is saying that this is how women must view men.

"Every man is a potential rapist" does not say the same thing as "I have to look at every man I encounter as someone who could be a rapist."

"Every man is a potential rapist" is an existential assertion about every man as long as he exists. It's saying the same thing about a 102-year-old man that it says about a 30-year-old man, and that's precisely what the third wave+ feminists who say it intend.

If that's not what you mean, then don't make that statement and don't defend that statement.

Gadarene · Oct 31, 2016

Zoii said:
No its protecting myself and what I need to do.

Noone ever needs to cut themselves off from half the human race.

Zoii · Oct 31, 2016

DaveW-Ohev said:
Do you prefer being preemptive or doing remediation?

Um..... i didnt understand this... can you explain to me please

Zoii · Oct 31, 2016

Gadarene said:
Noone ever needs to cut themselves off from half the human race.

Im not cut off.... I am managing risks

yeshuaslavejeff · Oct 31, 2016

Zoii said:
No its protecting myself and what I need to do.

(and learn Y'SHUA'S Protection from HIS WORD,)
but then> even HE did not trust men.
so,
YES, Rather better not to trust any man, even with perfect credentials and high prestige or status (that is how the enemy deceives so many so easily).

See the news abouthe theologic school in texas and the scandal on the news today - the coverup , long investigation, purposefully they refused to deal with it (the higher up administration).... just like in all the other big 'groups', including the biggest, for over 1000 years....
THAT is what is in men......

EVEN Y'SHUA MESSIAH DID NOT TRUST MEN !
YLT
and Jesus himself was not trusting himself to them, because of his knowing all [men],

VOICE
But Jesus saw through to the heart of humankind, and He chose not to give them what they requested. He didn’t need anyone to prove to Him the character of humanity. He knew what man was made of.

MSG
During the time he was in Jerusalem, those days of the Passover Feast, many people noticed the signs he was displaying and, seeing they pointed straight to God, entrusted their lives to him. But Jesus didn’t entrust his life to them. He knew them inside and out, knew how untrustworthy they were. He didn’t need any help in seeing right through them.

John 2:24
KJ21
But Jesus did not commit Himself unto them, because He knew all men,
ASV
But Jesus did not trust himself unto them, for that he knew all men,

Jack of Spades · Oct 31, 2016

Zoii said:
No its protecting myself and what I need to do.

You have every right to protect yourself the way you see fit. It's your life. If you need to stay out of men for now, it's totally fine. You know best what's good for you to keep you functioning.

Forums like this can be a bit bad places to talk about personal stuff, people are not very sensitive on boards like this, to say the least. Many people are just venting their own feelings here and don't think about anyone elses feelings on the way.

Zoii · Oct 31, 2016

Jack of Spades said:
You have every right to protect yourself the way you see fit. It's your life. If you need to stay out of men for now, it's totally fine. You know best what's good for you to keep you functioning.

Forums like this can be a bit bad places to talk about personal stuff, people are not very sensitive on boards like this, to say the least. Many people are just venting their own feelings here and don't think about anyone elses feelings on the way.

Ty

Dave-W · Oct 31, 2016

Zoii said:
Um..... i didnt understand this... can you explain to me please

Ok. Let me give an example.

On 9-11 several Arabic men took over 4 different airliners to do damage to the infrastructure of the US. 2 slammed into the towers of the World Trade Center in New York. One slammed into the Pentegon. (the smoke was easily seen from atop of this building) and the 4th was ditched in Pennsylvania due to some rather bold moves by passengers.

Being preemptive would mean barring the Arabs from boarding the planes. No loss of life or property.

Remediation is cleaning up the mess after the fact. Dealing with the collapse of the towers. Rebuilding the Pentagon. Families dealing with the thousands of deaths.

Would you rather be preemptive or deal with remediation?

In your case, being preemptive would mean removing the potential rapists; while remediation would be dealing with all the after-effects of being raped.

Zoii · Oct 31, 2016

DaveW-Ohev said:
Ok. Let me give an example.

On 9-11 several Arabic men took over 4 different airliners to do damage to the infrastructure of the US. 2 slammed into the towers of the World Trade Center in New York. One slammed into the Pentegon. (the smoke was easily seen from atop of this building) and the 4th was ditched in Pennsylvania due to some rather bold moves by passengers.

Being preemptive would mean barring the Arabs from boarding the planes. No loss of life or property.

Remediation is cleaning up the mess after the fact. Dealing with the collapse of the towers. Rebuilding the Pentagon. Families dealing with the thousands of deaths.

Would you rather be preemptive or deal with remediation?

In your case, being preemptive would mean removing the potential rapists; while remediation would be dealing with all the after-effects of being raped.

ok...... i shouldnt have said anything here n i think i got made fun of for saying stuff n other stuff i wish i hadnt said in a place like this.

The problem with "Every man is a potential rapist"

-______-

Well-Known Member

-______-

Well-Known Member

-______-

Well-Known Member

-______-

-______-

Well-Known Member

-______-

Well-Known Member

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner

-______-

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua

I told you so

Well-Known Member

Welcoming grandchild #7, Arturus Waggoner!

Well-Known Member

Similar threads

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency