Warden_of_the_Storm
Well-Known Member
- Oct 16, 2015
- 15,066
- 7,423
- 31
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Deist
- Marital Status
- Single
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Science today has no clue what the universe was like prior to the Fall.
Not a clue.
Even entropy as it's known today didn't exist.
And the earth was one tropical paradise.
Yeah well the earth was still a sphere long before it was proven. Ignorance of truth doesn’t negate truth.
That is a claim.
So is cosmic evolution.
And that does nothing to support the claim that the conditions of the universe were any different in the past than they were today.
There's more evidence for cosmic evolution than there is for your claim that the universe had vastly different conditions in the past.
The old "past is key to the present" idea; that opens doors to all sorts of junk history.
Only on paper.
And yet there's never been a single shred of... anything, that shows that the conditions of the universe haven't been vastly different in the past is wrong.
Looks like science is SOL* then.
* Short On Learning
You're going to run out of paper at this rate.
It's not my treeware that's being used up.
It's science's ever-changing paradigms that's causing a tree shortage.
Yesterday's science:
View attachment 355338
Or maybe... there is actually not a thing that shows that the universal conditions were vastly different in the past?
I heard too that everyone deep inside knows there is a god.Whichever unconscious mechanism you envision as the cause of the universe would just do that what it would do by default, namely create the universe... But with the uncaused cause being eternally self-existent, it would have created the universe an eternity ago, thereby running into the problems of an eternal universe.
Therefore the uncaused cause has to be conscious because only then it could decide to create the universe at any given time while itself being eternally self-existent.
Also if consciousness would be the result of mere chemical processes it would have no meaning. Our thoughts and feelings wouldn’t have any objective meaning, which would lead to the conclusion that nothing has any meaning.
I believe this conclusion is one of the causes of the existential crises we see many people struggling with nowadays because every human knows deep inside that our live do have an intrinsic purpose.
Scientists are. They ain't found nothing yet.
Thst is NOT a fact. It’s an opinion.
Like they would even know what to look for.
I've asked this many times here:
What would they look for?
Ion trails? Plasma clouds? Time crystals? Microwave background? what exactly?
So what the Bible says about the age of the earth isn’t evidence? Well I certainly hope that science is able to find evidence that Jesus died for your sins my friend before it’s too late.Which is a claim only and is not something that can be backed up actual evidence. We also have no reason to think nor assume that the conditions in the universe were as vastly different as BNR32FAN and others claim it to be.
So what the Bible says about the age of the earth isn’t evidence? Well I certainly hope that science is able to find evidence that Jesus died for your sins my friend before it’s too late.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?