Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Where in scripture are we taught to tell people to publicly acknowledge God during the salvation process or in order to be saved? We def need to be able to acknowledge, but that is no means a requirement of salvation and not something we are taught to provoke others to do.There is nothing wrong with asking people to make a choice to
accept Jesus Christ by publicly acknowledging before men
that they have chosen Jesus Christ as their Lord and savior.
Certainly, but it isn't because they were told to.On the day of pentacost after Peter preached the gospel publicly,
about 3,000 men accepted Christ before witnesses and were baptized.
Certainly, baptism comes after salvation.Act2
41 Then those who gladly received his word were baptized;
and that day about three thousand souls were added to them
In order to be saved to begin with? I think not. It's something Christians are just supposed to do, it's not the means of attaining salvation and it wasn't a test placed for prospects of salvation to pass.Jesus spoke about our need to confess Him before men.
Certainly, I just find no reason for such outward display to be the means by which people receive Jesus and definitely not let that become something we think is required to receive him. Rather it's simply believing and receiving, acting like a Christian comes after.Jesus knew that what is in a man's heart will be expressed in his actions.
Jesus knew that those who were willing to confess Him before men
had made the choice to follow Him and accept Him as Lord.
Certainly, but this isn't a formal requirement of receiving him.Matthew 10
32 “Therefore whoever confesses Me before men, him I will also confess before My Father who is in heaven.
What better way? I think this is only a perfect way to establish traditions and methods and prescriptions and teach people to trust and believe in things and methods rather than in God. What better way is there than to believe in him with your heart and receive him? This is the sort of thing that makes us think we have to raise our hands at certain times during the service, that we have to close our eyes while praying, that we have to stand at certain times, that the pastor or choir leader tells us when to stand, sit, kneel, close our eyes or raise our voices and we foolishly begin to believe that we are supposed to obey and supposed to do these things and these methods and traditions contain some degree of Godliness and they do not. They are forms that allow us to express what Godliness is inside of us. God is not contained in these things. Broken hearts and spirits are what he wants, willing hearts. People begin to think that because these methods and traditions fail... that God failed and they lose faith in him.So what better way to confess Jesus before men
then after hearing the gospel, going forward in declaration before men
who are a witness to your decision that you truly have accepted the gospel as
God's truth as you receive Jesus Christ as your Lord and savior.
Well Jesus did not prescribe a formal tradition of doing something or requiring something, that's something else entirely. Jesus didn't tell Finney or anyone else to tell people to walk down front or find a crowd or let such a crowd know in order to receive him.... establishing something like this as part of the process is a distraction and a very dangerous one. Wooden benches, chairs in the front, crowds, words, movements in our body do not save people... but these sort of things teach us that they do.Finney did not invent the alter call but mearly followed Christ's
declaration that those that confess Him as Lord before men, He will
confess that He accepts them before His Father in heaven.
I've always ben confuse as to what exactly an altar call is. >.<
I know at our current church at the end of the sermon the pastor has the elders come up and he asks that if anyone wants to come up for prayer to come do so.
That would be an altar call, I'd guess, but it seems like the impact of the altar call is lost if the pastor tries to kill two birds with one stone like this. The problem is that altar calls are appropriate when the audience is made up of people of all walks of life who've come out to hear a travelling preacher, as was once common on the American frontier or in Wesley's day when so many were unchurched. Billy Graham's crusades may have been the last good example of that sort of thing. But in today's average Methodist congregation, on any given Sunday there may not be a single unsaved adult in the audience.Or if there are non-believers that if they feel lead, they should come up and be lead to salvation.
The problem is that altar calls are appropriate when the audience is made up of people of all walks of life who've come out to hear a travelling preacher, as was once common on the American frontier or in Wesley's day when so many were unchurched. Billy Graham's crusades may have been the last good example of that sort of thing. But in today's average Methodist congregation, on any given Sunday there may not be a single unsaved adult in the audience.
Finney used something called an anxious chair, if you were anxious to receive Christ you had to be put to the test because if you weren't willing to stand for Jesus in public you weren't really willing to serve him at all. This began the popularization of the Altar Call... it provoked people through persuasion and a subtle form of manipulation. I think it fames items, objects, people, actions and defames the person and actions of our Lord and Savior and it simply doesn't consider that you can be saved in your home, alone on your knees or standing or sitting or running or jogging or while playing a video game or sipping tea, or on the the road, wherever the spirit of the Lord finds you. All who call on the name of the Lord will be saved and if we begin to add these sort of established traditions it very slowly erodes simple liberating principles like that.
I am not for the removal of the Altar Call, but rather for the removal of the idea that we really need such traditions.
Finney used something called an anxious chair, if you were anxious to receive Christ you had to be put to the test because if you weren't willing to stand for Jesus in public you weren't really willing to serve him at all. This began the popularization of the Altar Call... it provoked people through persuasion and a subtle form of manipulation. I think it fames items, objects, people, actions and defames the person and actions of our Lord and Savior and it simply doesn't consider that you can be saved in your home, alone on your knees or standing or sittle or running or jogging or while playing a video game or sipping tea, or on the the road, wherever the spirit of the Lord finds you. All who call on the name of the Lord will be saved and if we begin to add these sort of established traditions it very slowly erodes simple principles like that.
You have taken the scriptures I posted and discounted them allPal Handy
Where in scripture are we taught to tell people to publicly acknowledge God during the salvation process or in order to be saved? We def need to be able to acknowledge, but that is no means a requirement of salvation and not something we are taught to provoke others to do.
Certainly, but it isn't because they were told to.
Certainly, baptism comes after salvation.
In order to be saved to begin with? I think not. It's something Christians are just supposed to do, it's not the means of attaining salvation and it wasn't a test placed for prospects of salvation to pass.
Certainly, I just find no reason for such outward display to be the means by which people receive Jesus and definitely not let that become something we think is required to receive him. Rather it's simply believing and receiving, acting like a Christian comes after.
Certainly, but this isn't a formal requirement of receiving him.
What better way? I think this is only a perfect way to establish traditions and methods and prescriptions and teach people to trust and believe in things and methods rather than in God. What better way is there than to believe in him with your heart and receive him? This is the sort of thing that makes us think we have to raise our hands at certain times during the service, that we have to close our eyes while praying, that we have to stand at certain times, that the pastor or choir leader tells us when to stand, sit, kneel, close our eyes or raise our voices and we foolishly begin to believe that we are supposed to obey and supposed to do these things and these methods and traditions contain some degree of Godliness and they do not. They are forms that allow us to express what Godliness is inside of us. God is not contained in these things. Broken hearts and spirits are what he wants, willing hearts. People begin to think that because these methods and traditions fail... that God failed and they lose faith in him.
Well Jesus did not prescribe a formal tradition of doing something or requiring something, that's something else entirely. Jesus didn't tell Finney or anyone else to tell people to walk down front or find a crowd or let such a crowd know in order to receive him.... establishing something like this as part of the process is a distraction and a very dangerous one. Wooden benches, chairs in the front, crowds, words, movements in our body do not save people... but these sort of things teach us that they do.
You are making your own traditions by looking down onThis discussion takes our eyes off of things and other people and plants them securely on the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ... that is what it does.
I have not condemned the altar call... I say it is traditional, it can hurt people and it should not be or required and we should never allow anyone to perceive that is was or is required and we should not train people to find security in traditions, items, actions... but rather in God.
Well I already believe it isn't necessary but
now I am thinking it may not even be good.
I have knocked no one, I am not comfortable, I am not ashamed, I have not said anyone had it all wrong, easy vs not easy means nothing to me, I am discouraging no one, there is no debate or issue here until you entered.
You assume far too much and are far too concerned with other people's ideas and beliefs and are far too willing to make judgements on them.
I have not condemned the altar call... I say it is traditional, it can hurt people and it should not be or required and we should never allow anyone to perceive that is was or is required and we should not train people to find security in traditions, items, actions... but rather in God.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?