BarryDesborough
Well-Known Member
Dawkins allows for the possibility, however small in his estimation, that he is mistaken.
Do you?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Dawkins allows for the possibility, however small in his estimation, that he is mistaken.I don't think even Mr. Dawkins would agree with you on that.
But you're certainly entitled to your opinion.
No.Dawkins allows for the possibility, however small in his estimation, that he is mistaken.
Do you?
My pet slug says he is right.No.
I agree with my 5-year old niece ... he is wrong.
Funny how your quote (the best you could come up with I suppose) does not refer to evolution at all. Just how did you read that and then conclude that Satan invented evolution?66 books worth.
Romans 3:4 God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.
How many did you read?
Ad hominem argument? Does it matter if he didn't have a PhD?Unlike Mr. Darwin, who wrote about favoured races, and had a Ph.D in Nothing.
I'm sure he needs all the approval he can get.My pet slug says he is right.
No.
I agree with my 5-year old niece ... he is wrong.
My dear friend, do you need me to QV my post on what Solomon concluded about [pre-science] evolution?Funny how your quote (the best you could come up with I suppose) does not refer to evolution at all.
My dear friend, do you need me to QV my post on what Solomon concluded about [pre-science] evolution?
My dear friend, do you need me to QV my post on what Solomon concluded about [pre-science] evolution?
I don't think even Mr. Dawkins would agree with you on that.
It's what he doesn't agree with that's my point, chief.I don't think even Mr. Dawkins would agree with you on that.
But you're certainly entitled to your opinion.
And why should anyone care a lick what Mr. Dawkins agrees with?
It's what he doesn't agree with that's my point, chief.
I thought maybe you would welcome him around these parts.I'll rephrase the question, hoss -- why should we care a lick what Mr. Dawkins doesn't agree with?
I thought maybe you would welcome him around these parts.
Well, I thought maybe you could learn a few things from him.I'll repeat the question: Why should we care a lick about what Mr. Dawkins does or doesn't agree with?
Well, I thought maybe you could learn a few things from him.
Of course, if you're past the learning stage, then perhaps you wouldn't care.
Well ... maybe you could stand next to him and have your picture taken, then come back here and call someone a narcissist for using his post count to pwn someone who's falsely accusing him of never saying something he has, in fact, said; then realize that maybe ... just maybe ... you need to look in the mirror?And what can we learn from him, AV?
Well ... maybe you could stand next to him and have your picture taken, then come back here and call someone a narcissist for using his post count to pwn someone who's falsely accusing him of never saying something he has, in fact, said; then realize that maybe ... just maybe ... you need to look in the mirror?
Think so?
Nah!
I think you have me confused with someone else.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?