I think that they are playing a game to garner as much support for their ministries, organizations, etc. as they can. There are those who need to believe the things that they say ... and they know it.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I'll have to take your word on that, CabVet.
If that is true, then I apologize; but for the record, I don't think they are lying.
I'll have to take your word on that, CabVet.
I'll have to take your word on that, CabVet.
If that is true, then I apologize; but for the record, I don't think they are lying.
You don't think they are lying because you want and need what they say to be true.If that is true, then I apologize; but for the record, I don't think they are lying.
It would take extensive research to ascertain if one is lying or not.You wouldn't have to if you did your own research and saw for yourself what lying creationist weasels they are.
No, I don't.You don't think they are lying because you want and need what they say to be true.
Ken Ham and Kent Hovind are YECs ... I am not.In any event, I'm not here to debate Ken Ham and AiG. What they believe is their business.
Christians, IMO, need to get out of the "evidence producing" business, and let God handle the convictions.
Christians look silly when they try using evidence (other than their faith) to prove God, and Atheists look silly when they deny the singularities that occurred in the first 4000 years of Earth's history.
It would take extensive research to ascertain if one is lying or not.
This is because one must show an intent to deceive.
If someone says Jesus walked on water, is he lying?
Splitting hairs, yet you defend them.No, I don't.
QV please:
Ken Ham and Kent Hovind are YECs ... I am not.
You are correct, he is mixing them up. But I fail to see hatred there. What I do see is frustration due to the fact that both of them (Ken and Kent) keep repeating lies and misinformation about geology and evolution. I do wonder how you would react if someone started publishing book after book with lies and misinformation about the Bible. Not even the hated (and that is really hatred) Richard Dawkins does that.
I'll have to take your word on that, CabVet.
If that is true, then I apologize; but for the record, I don't think they are lying.
Splitting hairs, yet you defend them.
YEC == The universe has existed less than 10,000 years.
Embedded Age == The universe has existed less than 10,000 years, but was created with 4 billion years of non-history.
Not much difference. One denies numerous fields of science, the other tries to squeeze theology into a science recognized shoe.
It would take extensive research to ascertain if one is lying or not.
This is because one must show an intent to deceive.
Just wondering if anyone has read this book?
Is it any good? What weaknesses do you think were contained in there?
It seems, he's a YEC who thinks a literal approach to Genesis should be employed.
It would take extensive research to ascertain if one is lying or not.
This is because one must show an intent to deceive.
66 books worth.How much "extensive research" did you undertake to conclude that the theroy of evolution is a lie?
66 books worth.
Romans 3:4 God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.
How many did you read?
I read all 66 of them as well, and I found it interesting how not a single of them referred to evolution, or internal combustion engines, or airplanes, or space travel, or internet forums.
Did you see any referrals to:I read all 66 of them as well, and I found it interesting how not a single of them referred to evolution, or internal combustion engines, or airplanes, or space travel, or internet forums.
I don't think even Mr. Dawkins would agree with you on that.Is every man who says he knows that he has the exclusive, true way of interpreting scripture a liar?
I think so.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?