• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The Nano Robots and Machines Inside You,

Status
Not open for further replies.

Radrook

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2016
11,539
2,725
USA
Visit site
✟150,370.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
This is an excerpt from a book written by a biochemist which supports the information provide in the threads video:

 
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,626
82
St Charles, IL
✟347,280.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Interesting list. How many of those laureates believed in ID? Any at all?
 
Upvote 0

TagliatelliMonster

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2016
4,292
3,373
46
Brugge
✟81,672.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private

You mean like, the "atheist" scientists Ken Miller en Francis Collins?

ow, wait..................................
 
Upvote 0

TagliatelliMonster

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2016
4,292
3,373
46
Brugge
✟81,672.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Are you saying that DNA doesn't contain a message that is decoded by RNA?

A message is information that goes from entity A to entity B.

DNA is a molecule, not a message.

Claiming that it just involves chemicals doesn't explain the evidence of information and doesn't identify the information's SOURCE.

I guess it's a good thing then, that nobody claims it does.
 
Upvote 0

TagliatelliMonster

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2016
4,292
3,373
46
Brugge
✟81,672.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Atheistic Bias is the real reason.

"atheistic"... like Ken Miller or Francis Collins? Or our resident poster Speedwell?

Ow, wait...................


So how many more times am I going to have to point out that the rejection of ID has nothing to do with atheism, before you will stop claiming it?
 
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,181
✟545,630.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Calling any scientist who is or was not an atheist not a scientist proves my point about the loss of objectivity.

Good thing I never said that. Don't confuse "scientific" creationism with Christianity.
 
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,181
✟545,630.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
This is an excerpt from a book written by a biochemist which supports the information provide in the threads video:

Yep, Behe is quite the advocate for ID :
"There are no peer reviewed articles by anyone advocating for intelligent design supported by pertinent experiments or calculations which provide detailed rigorous accounts of how intelligent design of any biological system occurred"
 
Upvote 0

TagliatelliMonster

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2016
4,292
3,373
46
Brugge
✟81,672.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
This is an excerpt from a book written by a biochemist which supports the information provide in the threads video:


Ow, goodie....

Michael Behe, the laughing stock of the scientific community and an embarassement to the university where he has tenure, who infamously had to declare under oath at the Dover trial that if ID is science, then so is Astrology.

Great reference you got there.......
 
Upvote 0

Radrook

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2016
11,539
2,725
USA
Visit site
✟150,370.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0

Radrook

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2016
11,539
2,725
USA
Visit site
✟150,370.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0

TagliatelliMonster

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2016
4,292
3,373
46
Brugge
✟81,672.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
There are messages in DNA. You need to look up the definition of the word "message"
Scientists discover double meaning in genetic code | UW Today

Ok. Here's the full dictionary definition of "message" (bolding mine):

noun
1.
a communication containing some information, news, advice, request, or the like, sent by messenger, telephone, email, or other means.
2.
an official communication, as from a chief executive to a legislative body:
the president's message to Congress.
3.
Digital Technology. a post or reply on an online message board.
4.
the inspired utterance of a prophet or sage.
5.
the point, moral, or meaning of a gesture, utterance, novel, motion picture, etc.
6.
Computers. a warning, permission, etc., communicated by the system or software to the user:
anerror message ; a message to allow blocked content.

verb (used without object)
7.
to send a message, especially an electronic message.
verb (used with object)
8.
to send (a person) a message.
9.
to send as a message.



Not a single one of these is applicable to DNA. All of them refer to some type of communication. DNA is not communication or a means of communication. DNA is a molecule, shaped by the process of evolution.
 
Upvote 0

Radrook

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2016
11,539
2,725
USA
Visit site
✟150,370.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.