Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Posted by dad
In the beginning was the word, and the word...was God. This is news?
But Christians forget that scripture says Christ = Truth.
Truth IS the word which was in the beginning with the almighty.
Truth, including Scientific Truth, is the son-of-God.
Truth is actually God to us who image Truth in our mind because we can not directly esperience the Almighty except through thoughts that equate tio "Him."
John1:1
In the beginning was the Word, (i.e.; Truth: [John 14:6]), and the Word, (Truth, itself), was (synonymous) with God, (i,e.; Reality), and the Word, (Truth: [John 14:6]), was (indistinguishable from Reality), God (almigty for all men).
2 He, (Truth, the symbolic Word to come: [Jud 1:3]) was with God, (the ever unfolding Reality), in the beginning, (by definition).
Just one? Fish are older than plants. Want more? Arthropods. I can give you a lot more if you want.
Jesus explained how He fulfilled the psalms and prophets..etc. So, I will take the bible as His word, and Jesus as the living word, the fulfillment of the words He gave to man. That makes the whole thing important and not to be trifled with.Understanding that Christ is the way the truth and the life is very different to calling him scripture.
Jesus explained how He fulfilled the psalms and prophets..etc. So, I will take the bible as His word, and Jesus as the living word, the fulfillment of the words He gave to man. That makes the whole thing important and not to be trifled with.
Funny John mentions 'that which we have handled'. We can handle a bible also. The words Jesus spoke He said ARE spirit, and life. So you can't trivialize them.You are equating something finite, with something that is infinite. You are equating something created with something that was not created. In all cases you are wrong.
Funny John mentions 'that which we have handled'. We can handle a bible also. The words Jesus spoke He said ARE spirit, and life. So you can't trivialize them.
I notice no swarm of experts questioned the rapid layer forming freezing of flood waters. It is in keeping apparently with the evidences! How interesting. Knowing evos, if they coulda shot the idea down, they would have been popping up and shooting!
Nevertheless Jesus said not one jot or tittle would fail from the scriptures. So we have the very words from God. How could we toss aside whole sections wily nily to please science?Jesus did many other things as well. If every one of them were written down, I suppose that even the whole world would not have room for the books that would be written.
Nevertheless Jesus said not one jot or tittle would fail from the scriptures. So we have the very words from God. How could we toss aside whole sections wily nily to please science?
What rapid freezing of what flood waters?I notice no swarm of experts questioned the rapid layer forming freezing of flood waters.
What evidence demonstrates rapid freezing of flood waters?It is in keeping apparently with the evidences! How interesting.
Knowing evos, if they coulda shot the idea down, they would have been popping up and shooting!
? What is false? The perceived need to agree with science??False accusation most likely based on your insistence that something has to be literal for it to be true.
Well I am open to someone making a case that it was the waters from above that froze. However, I lean to the waters that came up from below.What rapid freezing of what flood waters?
The evidence I referred to that it was in keeping with was the evidences like ice cores, and a lot of ice at the poles, etc etc.What evidence demonstrates rapid freezing of flood waters?
Now now, petty jealousy is not something we need to be dealing with here.Not much point... we all know you are "undefeated" by logic or correction of your errors.
? What is false? The perceived need to agree with science??
Well I am open to someone making a case that it was the waters from above that froze. However, I lean to the waters that came up from below.
The evidence I referred to that it was in keeping with was the evidences like ice cores, and a lot of ice at the poles, etc etc.
Now now, petty jealousy is not something we need to be dealing with here.
Ice cores can equate to rapid freezing. Any comment on the OP?Like I said... no evidence of anything (ice cores do not equate to rapid freezing) and not much point.
..
Ice cores can equate to rapid freezing. Any comment on the OP?
Yeah, I have a comment, I wonder why you are trying to rationalize a supernatural event like the flood.
What is next? Explaining that Jesus resurrected Lazarus by creating an electrical charge that restarted his heart?
I thought that was known? God opened the windows of heaven and founts of the deep. No mystery there. The thread is about the freezing of the waters later...the ice age. I have to tell you this??Why do you want to determine how the flood happened?
I don't call them that. I guess you have your reasons. By the way, what are they?There is a reason why those things are called "miracles" and "divine" acts.
Hey there are no Alps too? Come on man. Cut with the little proclamations. Admit ignorance. Not like anyone doubts it.Because they didn't happen.
Hey sober up and get back to us. So called science is the myth.You talk about and believe myths, you make things up and then accuse people of being ignorant of what you are doing, you live in a dream world and wonder why people can not understand your dreams, everything you write is nonsense based on nonsense and you talk as if the nonsense was fact when all it is is nonsense.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?