Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
An opinion. You are welcome to hold it. Given present limited menu science can only conclude that from the existing model.
This is such a weak and self-defeating argument.There is. We only observe life from life.
Nice assertion. Do you have anything to back it up, or is this just a (yawn) argument from incredulity?Assuming life can just create itself is fine for comic books... it's absurd in reality.
Insert the word “ known” to become “no known force”My phrasing might be an opinion, but there is no force beyond the 4 known fundamental forces that could meaningfully interact with an animals body. Or as otherwise stated -- no life force.
This has been demonstrated by experimental physics. It's not widely known, as I suspect even many physicists don't realize it or it's implications. Probably because it smashes all of those comforting notions of supernatural spirituality.
There is. We only observe life from life. Assuming life can just create itself is fine for comic books... it's absurd in reality.
Its also absurd in objective reality, to presume precursor chemical evolution (OOL) depends on assumptions about 'life creating itself'.There is. We only observe life from life. Assuming life can just create itself is fine for comic books... it's absurd in reality.
Umm .. rubbish?What else do you call it when one decides random chemicals somehow created an extremely complex cell by accident?
What else do you call it when one decides random chemicals somehow created an extremely complex cell by accident?
Insert the word “ known” to become “no known force”
I thought science was supposed to be logical? Now it just assumes the impossible can happen with zero real evidence.
Like the existence of God? Only 4 percent of the population doesn't believe in a God.
Why? Probably because they know life had to begin from something more than an accident.
I added to that post in hindsight.No, it's not a matter of a possible unknown force. There is none.
All forces that *could* interact with a animal's body (on the right length and energy scale) have been detected. No more *can* be detected given the experimental probes of the parameter space.
Not like that at all.Like the existence of God?
7% don't believe in a god, 70% don't believe in God.Only 4 percent of the population doesn't believe in a God.
Citation please.Why? Probably because they know life had to begin from something more than an accident.
In Physics, the rate of using Energy is equal to the rate of doing work. The force is the measure of transfer of energy to do work.I added to that post in hindsight.
The experiential evidence of consciousness out of body has no interaction, only observation. Force implies interaction. So a better expression more compliant with how those words are used in a physics context would be “ life energy” not “ life force” .
Nothing in Physics is ever 'deemed non interacting'. Please cite your references that it is.Mountainmike said:Since in physics most of the matter / energy is missing and deemed non interacting or only weakly interacting it is hardly a stretch of the imagination.
Please cite references for any 'basic premise of all the experiments'.Mountainmike said:The basic premise of all the experiments is the idea of “ always happens” in the same causal way. A science of repeatable things, that do repeat or can be repeated.
What a load of gobbledygook! This should be taken to the Non Mainstream sceince forum .. (where it belongs).Mountainmike said:People or beings generally with choice in the matter of whether to act, are not nearly as easily tested or testable , not least because many documented phenomena of conscious experience of remote locations are not apparently under the control of the experiencer.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?