Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I see chimps and apes skulls lined up side by side with a few humans. No relation.
Ah, I asked you how you know that it was the same, and you tell me because you know when it was the same.Ah, I asked you how you know that it was not the same, and you tell me because you know when it was not the same.
They do ban bibles and creation teaching though, and mandate the religion of evolution. Good thing a lot of kids realize what is going on and rebel in their hearts against it. Ha.Ah, you know it must be a religion because we force children to science religion school to sing:
The Origin of the Species.Oh wait, we don't do that. Isn't that what you do?
Yes, that's the book for me!
I stand alone on the word of Darwin,
The O-O-T-S!
Present a reason to believe a different state past existed.
You say you do but do not have anything whatsoever. Hilarious. Your beliefs also fly in the face of the historical and Scripture records.We have evidence for the the state staying the same, in that it has never been shown to for all human history and that the evidence of ancient times supports it being the same.
Easy. Does it promote or attack faith in Jesus as creator and His word?You also need to present evidence that the theory was presented from supernatural sources. This is even harder for you as we have the actual detailed writings of the scientists who developed the theory.
Totally unreaonable fanatical blind faith and faith alone actually.The nature being the same is a totally reasonable conclusion from the evidence.
Get over yourself. You think it matters what you assume for no reason? The issue is what science knows and can prove.WHY SHOULD WE ASSUMED IT CHANGED?
It isn't about me. Now I ask you, if the bible and creation are real and true, what is the best way to interpret evidence?Being poetic doesn't answer the direction question: "How do you know you are more reliable in your ability to discern then anyone else, Christian and non Christian alike?"
Also I really need to know how you define religion. Because I can't work it out from context.
Any history that records spirits as real beings, or long life spans for example.What history? All you have is your interpretation of a distinctly mythical chapter of the bible.
The evidence is that languages did not develop simultaneously with ancient Babylon.
Says who?There is no layer or evidence for a great flood.
Jesus is evidence for a creator.You can't present objective evidence for a creator, do you can't use that as evidence that it created anything.
Ah, I asked you how you know that it was the same, and you tell me because you know when it was the same.
Thanks for answering...Wait, what?
[Shaking my head in sorrow]
They do ban bibles and creation teaching though, and mandate the religion of evolution. Good thing a lot of kids realize what is going on and rebel in their hearts against it. Ha.
Uh no, That is not what I said. In previous posts I have given you detailed arguments for why it is reasonable to expect the laws of nature have been constant.Ah, I asked you how you know that it was the same, and you tell me because you know when it was the same.
Thanks for answering...Wait, what?
[Shaking my head in sorrow]
Well, if you make up a same nature in the past, it's up to you to show evidence. This is news?When one makes a positive claim about a SPECIFIC EVENT (rather than the lack of a specific event) it is up to the person making the positive claim to show evidence of said specific event.
You are under obligation to support what you base all claims upon. In your case, a same nature having existed in the past is your claim, not war. Get to er.In other words: I am in no way on the hook to provide evidence that the world wasn't destroyed in an atomic holocaust last week and replaced with a perfect simulation of the world just before the holocaust wherein all the people don't remember the nuclear holocaust.
If the bible tells of a different nature in the future, you cannot tell us it will not be, or will be. Same with the past. You may say 'I do not know'. That is the full extent of what you may do in any and all origin issues.
If you were to say that there was a specific event (the change from a "different state of physics" to the modern state of physics) then it is up to YOU to provide evidence for it.
It is in schools. No news there.You talk a big game... how would you like it if religion were actually allowed in schools? Sounds good does it? How about if it's not your religion?
Not so sanguine then I bet.
You have offered beliefs. I do not find your unsupported beliefs reasonable in any way. I do not think that claiming the universe sailed out from a teensy sweet nothing of a hot soup to be reasonable. I do not find claiming a pretty woman shared a common ancestor with a potato reasonable.Uh no, That is not what I said. In previous posts I have given you detailed arguments for why it is reasonable to expect the laws of nature have been constant.
You mean the first life? That's not even a part of evolution.
Cars aren't organic and undergo small random changes every generation.
Yeah, when a car evolves naturally it's called a horse.i actually talking about an organic molecule. do you think that such a mulecule can evolve stepwise into a car? it should be possible if you believe in evolution.
yes realy. so you main objection to my argument is that we can prove that a complex system can evolve. now, do you agree that a car is ic system? if not tell why and we will continue.
Well, if you make up a same nature in the past, it's up to you to show evidence. This is news?
You are under obligation to support what you base all claims upon. In your case, a same nature having existed in the past is your claim, not war. Get to er.
If the bible tells of a different nature in the future, you cannot tell us it will not be, or will be. Same with the past. You may say 'I do not know'. That is the full extent of what you may do in any and all origin issues.
Nothing can ever evolve into a car because a car is a machine not a living thing.i actually talking about an organic molecule. do you think that such a mulecule can evolve stepwise into a car? it should be possible if you believe in evolution.
If you make up a same nature in the past, it's up to you to show evidence. You cannot do that. Don't blame others. Not sure if you actually understand this.I understand this is your "schtick", but I have to ask if you honestly have no idea what people are saying to you or if most of your responses are autogenerated.
I'm just curious. (DOn't worry, I won't tell anyone if you are just playin' and you actually do understand what is being said.)
If you make up a same nature in the past, it's up to you to show evidence. You cannot do that. Don't blame others. Not sure if you actually understand this.
So you think you are making a valid riposte to my statement? Really?
Ok. (Like I said, I won't tell anyone if you are just funnin' here...)
Actually the divine essence is in life, not the dead. Science doesn't even know that.OF COURSE! I mean it only takes a quick view to see that there is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING in common to the ones that are fully modern humans! I mean you can almost see the divine essence in the human skulls!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?