Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
We do have evidence that the laws were always the same, and I told you that before.No. Only as long as the laws were the same would this work. So for the last say, 3000 years...fine.
What evidence do you have that the laws of nature changed some 3000 years ago?
You cannot conclude that maybe nature was the same at the crime scene or in the Jurassic unless you have evidence it indeed was. You don't. I cannot lose.
Please. Point out the strawman. Creationists repeatedly lie about the existence of evidence for evolution... and your reaction was "Who cares?".
No more than it checks out without your imaginary same nature in the past.Evolution claims works on the principle that the slow evolution we see evidence for in real time is all that is required to account for the diversity of life... and the evidence checks out.
I have eyes to see. I have ears to hear. Science has religion.I'm curious why you are immune to the mistakes the rest of them are making?
You have never presented any reason to even accept that a same state past existed, despite history and the bible records flying in the face of that belief. I don't have to claim it never happened. As I said, no one has given me a good reason to even entertain the idea. The records of history and God also give me many reasons to know your claimed imaginary past is bogus.Except you have never presented any reason aside from your own dubious supernatural discernment to even accept that a different state existed.
Claiming that evolution was anything but a created trait and that if we deny the theory of evolution, we are denying any evolving is a strawman.Oh, and passion about honesty is "shrill" now? Charming.
Not in any way do you have even a tiny piece of evidence for your religion, and I told you that before.We do have evidence that the laws were always the same, and I told you that before.
Because we know approx when nature was no longer the same.If you say that the laws of nature change, how do you know they were not different at that crime scene last Tuesday?
Again, not one fossil sequence showing morphological changes of one lifeform changing into another. Got it.
You know, there are millions of fossils of advanced mammals that the fossil record shows zero sequence of one type of mammal remains going through morphological changes to a structurally different life form.
Zero is zero.
There are none. What exists are scientific guesstimations of the tree of life lifeforms found.
And of the below picture, imagine the many very complex mutations to bring about mental, nerve, blood vessel array, and such to transition one human-like species to another. Incredibly complex and intricate biomoleculer and anatomical mutations.
View attachment 225285
Ah, I asked you how you know that it was not the same, and you tell me because you know when it was not the same.Because we know approx when nature was no longer the same.
Not in any way do you have even a tiny piece of evidence for your religion, and I told you that before.
No, you worked it backwards. Basic logic. If humans make a biological compound does NOT mean that all biological compounds had to be made by humans.
Sure, but it shows it can work. And we see it working pretty much every day! No designer is needed in order to create a "super-bug" out of just a regular "bug".
No, the burden of proof is still on you to prove that living creatures cannot evolve naturally.but to do so you need to prove that living creatures can evolve naturally. but since no one can then the conclusion for living things is the same as for a car.
but to do so you need to prove that living creatures can evolve naturally.
but since no one can then the conclusion for living things is the same as for a car.
sure that simple mutations can happen. but they just simple mutations.
we never seen how such simple mutations can evolve complex systems like an eye, a motion system etc. so this kind of mutation mean nothing.
yes i do. do you agree that a minimal car need at least several parts for its minimal function? if so: why not a minimal complex biological system?
Present a reason to believe a different state past existed. We have evidence for the the state staying the same, in that it has never been shown to for all human history and that the evidence of ancient times supports it being the same.Right, I have no problem with tons of evolving that went on real fast in the former different nature. You problems include claiming that it was present nature slow evolving, and that it was only evolving that did it all, and that you have no clue what was created TO start evolving! So adapt/evolving is fine, but the theory of evolution is a complete fable. The great deception. It is a theory that was not randomly produced, or naturally selected, but supernaturally and deliberately introduced to man to instill fear and doubt in God and creation.
No more than it checks out without your imaginary same nature in the past.
As far as your house of fables built on the foundation of a same nature in the past, the assumption remains pointless, so the house of cards built on it is also pointless. (except for the aforementioned point of being inspired by fallen spirits, to try and delude and damn mankind)
Being poetic doesn't answer the direction question: "How do you know you are more reliable in your ability to discern then anyone else, Christian and non Christian alike?"I have eyes to see. I have ears to hear. Science has religion.
You have never presented any reason to even accept that a same state past existed, despite history and the bible records flying in the face of that belief. I don't have to claim it never happened. As I said, no one has given me a good reason to even entertain the idea. The records of history and God also give me many reasons to know your claimed imaginary past is bogus.
Claiming that evolution was anything but a created trait and that if we deny the theory of evolution, we are denying any evolving is a strawman.
You mean the first life? That's not even a part of evolution.yes i do. do you agree that a minimal car need at least several parts for its minimal function? if so: why not a minimal complex biological system?
Reset.Do you have an actual example of a leap too far actually proposed by evolution?
This should be good. Please show be where history confirms there was a complete change of nature a couple of hundred years after a global flood.You have never presented any reason to even accept that a same state past existed, despite history and the bible records flying in the face of that belief.
It is fact which has given Evolutions a black eye - out of billions of fossils inspected and documented there is not one single sequence/succession that shows Evolution by the fossil record.
Not one sequence showing morphological changes of one lifeform changing into another lifeform.
Again, not one evidence has been found.
What the fossil record does show is how God over time would have made Kinds of lifeforms. The fossil record proves this - since there is not one case of displaying by physical remains of postulated evolution of life forms.
Again, out of billions of fossils not one sequence showing hard physical fact of morphological change of one lifeform changing into another lifeform.
This is called no foundation for Evolution.
The fossil record instead has tantamount evidence in how God would have developed life over time. And their remains we would have physical evidence to display before all.
It is time for bias debaters and believers in Evolution to face up to the obvious. What the fossil record really shows.
That was easy.
Next question?
Those on the right of the top row have larger brains and less developed muzzles then any modern chimp or gorilla.I see chimps and apes skulls lined up side by side with a few humans. No relation.
Cars aren't organic and undergo small random changes every generation... they don't even have generations, because they don't breed, aren't animals and aren't magical.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?