Warden_of_the_Storm
Well-Known Member
- Oct 16, 2015
- 15,038
- 7,403
- 31
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Deist
- Marital Status
- Single
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The fossil record proves how God Created Kinds, with no evolution. Zero lifeforms evolving morphologically into another lifeform over time in the fossil record. Just as God would have made the fossil record, per Genesis One. 100% evidence supporting Genesis One Kinds with no evolution in sight or needed.
Go get a paleontology text and then show me the fossil record of evolution. Or the pose of such happening.Why are you lying?
Go get a paleontology text and then show me the fossil record of evolution. Or the pose of such happening.
Are you unwilling to face the glaring fact that out of billions of fossils there are no sequence of fossils unearthed showing morphological changes of one lifeform changing into another lifeform over time?
Are you unwilling to face this face?
Not one sequence showing morphological changes of one lifeform changing into another lifeform over time.Again: why are you lying?
You are showing cartoons. Cartoons with speculation.No, what you are taking part in here is a little parlor game.
One could show the fossils between ambulocetus and whale and you'd demand mid-points between each of the points.
You will complain that there is no mid-point between Dorudon and Balaena, or that there is no mid point between Diacodexis and Pakicetus etc.
Or if were to show Tiktaalik in context:
You will no doubt complain that there is no mid-point between Tiktaalik and Acanthostega and so on and so forth.
It is a simple game and really does no service to any larger point.
Nope. But then I did have a paleontology class in undergrad so....
There are, nor ever were, new morphological features which have no immediate utility. Every step of evolutionary change results in immediate increased fitness.The posts supporting physical evolution is porous of facts, and linked to speculation.
The first stage of feet growing inside a creature over geologic time by thousands if not millions of mutations, a morphological feature that has no present utility? And they keep on mutating "into feet" until finally utility?
Again, who are you? You pose truck loads of speculations of thousands of mutations of no utility but still on a - natural process pathway - to more lifeform complexity?
So this is physical proof in the fossil record - the best to bring forth.
You will complain that there is no mid-point between
You will no doubt complain
Debaters who are bias to evolution have a hard time facing the reality the fossil record presents - no physical evidence of evolution. Zero.
I meet a believer of evolution. Where mutations by the thousands change creatures such as fish to have legs.There are, nor ever were, new morphological features which have no immediate utility. Every step of evolutionary change results in immediate increased fitness.
Show me in a paleontology text, Ward.Have you looked at the links I provided in post #183?
Show me in a paleontology text, Ward.
So this is physical proof in the fossil record - the best to bring forth.
First, they are arranged cartoons.
Do you know how many mutations it would take to trend from just one pair of cartoon figures? And you say natural processes existed for this paired sequence? Thousands of mutations occurred without no increased functionality in transition?
Such is speculation. I faced it when in college taking geologic coursework. In cousework you get firsthand information of the "proof of evolution." What exist is zero evidence of one lifeform anatomically changing into another lifeform over time.
Debaters who are bias to evolution have a hard time facing the reality the fossil record presents - no physical evidence of evolution. Zero.
Who are you? And what disinformation are you proposing?
Well, let us further wonder why God would decide to make several animals sequentially throughtout geologic time which appear transitional. Why? But remember there aren't NUMEROUS creation events....ONLY ONE in the Bible. Yet these animals don't all exist at the same time! Why is that?
In the OP, there is reference to zero fossil sequences of one lifeform morpholigically changing step by step into another lifeform.
Zero means zero.
The fossil record does not show evolution ever happened. The very physical evidence to prove evolution scientifically does not exist.
The fossil record then proves there is not a biological process of natural factors and conditions that show one lesser lifeform changes through such referred natural and biological processes into a new lifeform morphologically distinct and adapted to its natural surroundings.
Zero natural process exist for evolution.
The position of evolutionists is now like stating nature evolves mopeds into Harley's, VW's into Porsche's, lawnmowere into farm tractors, pickup trucks into semi's. The list goes on. There are no natural processes nor pathways of "equipment evolving".
The same is true with lifeforms past and present - no natural processes nor pathways of "complex lifeforms evolving."
Now tell us again how a Chevy evolves into a Mercedes. You know, a process where over time into a more complex higher equipment-form.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?