- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,334
- 52,694
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You may be unaware of Science AV, but you are not that unawre of history.
Google William Buckland. Dean of Westminster Cathedral, Leading Geologist of his period and YEC.
If the interpretation is wrong, how should we be interpreting it. If the evidence has been "cleaned up" how do you know - you don't have any documentation to that effect.
Genesis 8:13 said:And it came to pass in the six hundredth and first year, in the first month, the first day of the month, the waters were dried up from off the earth: and Noah removed the covering of the ark, and looked, and, behold, the face of the ground was dry.
Matthew Henry's commentary --- Genesis 8:13 said:The divine power which now renewed the face of the earth can renew the face of an afflicted troubled soul and of a distressed persecuted church. He can make dry ground to appear even where it seemed to have been lost and forgotten, Ps 18:16.
No, you don't.I don't, huh?
No, you don't.
That verse doesn't say anything about removing the geological traces, much less planting new evidence that is incompatible with the very notion of a worldwide flood.
Yes he did. He planted lake varves that show hundreds of thousands of years' worth of uninterrupted progression. He altered the Artic ice so that the ice cores extracted from it would show, again, a history stretching back hundreds of millenia without showing traces of the supposed flood.God didn't "plant" anything
I guess I am. Let me guess: the global super-altering geological split erased all the evidence for the flood, made the new evidence discussed above and then deleted its own traces.and you're ignoring a global super-altering geological split that occurred about 100 years later in Peleg's time.
Yes he did. He planted lake varves that show hundreds of thousands of years' worth of uninterrupted progression. He altered the Artic ice so that the ice cores extracted from it would show, again, a history stretching back hundreds of millenia without showing traces of the supposed flood.
Well, apparently he thought it would be better to leave a lot of evidence suggesting that age, without documenting that this evidence is wrong.No, He didn't --- if He wanted you to know the earth was 4.55 billion years old, He would have documented it.
Chapter and verse on the "global super-altering geological split", please.
Uh huh. Did this now leave any traces, or did God again replace them for sanitary reasons?[bible]Genesis 10:25[/bible]
Uh huh. Did this now leave any traces, or did God again replace them for sanitary reasons?
I don't, huh?
[bible]Genesis 10:25[/bible]
Infected with dadism
The split is back!!!!!!!!!!
How do you know this passage does not refer to the splitting of the human population, rather than the continents?
How do you know this passage does not refer to the splitting of the human population, rather than the continents?
Have you ever considered that the world at the time that this was written consisted entirely of the Africa-Eurasia supper content? It would be kind of stupid to say that the contents where divided when all the contents where clearly connected.Um ... well ... because the continents are split? And no other passages seem to refer to it? And with some, it's basic theology?
Have you ever considered that the world at the time that this was written consisted entirely of the Africa-Eurasia supper content? It would be kind of stupid to say that the contents where divided when all the contents where clearly connected.
the only explanation you gave was it didn't mean what i said it did. You have never said what you did actually mean by it, probably because there appears to be no other explanation.
But you are a creationist and congenitally inable to admit any error however small, so I let you off.
Well I would have to point out specific individuals to do that and though "some" may revel in doing that, I don't so I won't.
Just keep your eyes open and you'll see it. For those who do it they will know who they are.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?