Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The point is that evolutionary theory is a myth that is based on people doing drawing. There is a lack of evidence to back up their drawing.Does it need to be explained that clicking Google "image" will show pictures?
It has been a long time sense I have seen anyone involved in a serious in debth discussion. I try to get one going but most most people avoid in debth discussions because it rapidly becomes apparent that evolutionary theory is a myth and a fairy tale with no real science to back it up. Horse evolution is a wonderful example because just about every drawing they come up with is as bogus as can be. Horses did not evolved from small to big the way the art drawing show. They evolved more like this. Evolutionists want to shrug it off that they were and really still are promoting a bogus lie. Because what is really going on is more complicated then what they are ready, willing and able to deal with.
Exactly, evolutionary theory is full of baloney.Baloney!
Not all the information was in regard to just our planet. The second link was in regard to other planets. Intrinsically as in the nature of the universe as rare.OK lots of interesting stuff to think about there, however....
Your premise 1 was
All of the information you provided supports a different premise. The rare earth hypothesis suppers the premise that: in our life permitting universe, the frequency with which intelligent life arises is extremely low.
We can get into that hypothesis and what it tells us later if you like but first we have to establish your first premise (or you could rewrite it I guess). So do you have any support for the notion that a life permitting universe is intrinsically ( quick question, what does the word intrinsically add to this statement? ) unlikely?
Don't be silly. When something in the Bible is shown to be false people simply reinterpret the Bible. It has been shown that the Earth is not flat, that the Earth is not fixed in place and everything revolves around it. It has been shown that there was no Adam and Eve, no Noah's Ark, no Exodus.
The list goes on. The fact that you may not know all of the many flaws in the Bible does not mean that they do not exist.
adjective, quainter, quaintest.
1.
having an old-fashioned attractiveness or charm; oddly picturesque:
a quaint old house.
2.
strange, peculiar, or unusual in an interesting, pleasing, or amusingway:
a quaint sense of humor.
3.
skillfully or cleverly made.
4.
Obsolete. wise; skilled.
Hint, not 1,3,or 4.
Nothing of the sort has been shown. In fact your Pratts have been refuted many times and the thinking that these Pratts are based on has been thoroughly exposed and shown to be unsubstantiated. Your pretty much kicking a dead horse.It has been shown
What about the great oxygenation event?
It is pretty complicated to do an operation. They have their limits in what they are effect at being able to do. People need to realize that. Everything is so specialized now that people only learn how to do their little niche.
So you believe that there is no reason to do science to find out about how something exists but you defend evolution all the time. Why the difference?
I read through all the links and as you say not all of them dealt only with life on earth. But talking about other planets etc still does not support the premise you are arguing. The hypothesis that these articles suppet is that even in a universe where life is possible, it remains a rare, possibly even exclusive, occurrence. Again this does not help you support first premise that the universe with parameters that allow life is rare and that is the one you need to provide evidence for.Not all the information was in regard to just our planet. The second link was in regard to other planets. Intrinsically as in the nature of the universe as rare.
Why are you participating in this thread if you do not understand?
We can do more than speculate. For instance lets take the abiogenesis question as an example. We don't know how life actually began but scientists know things about what life requires and what needs to be present in the forming of life to create experiments to aid them in learning about how it might have come about. Knowing certain things that would not aid in life's origin and would in fact prohibit it is not speculation but based on what we know about life and its requirements.
This is similar to what we have in determining what types of consequences for the universe and life itself would have if the KNOWN measurements/values were tweaked in different ways.
Take .01% smaller or larger in weak force for instance and this would happen and so they know and do not speculate in that way.
If you agree that the phenomena of fine tuning is real and backed by science, then we have our starting point.
1. A intelligent life supporting universe is intrinsically unlikely.
2. A powerful and intelligent Creator who wanted such a universe for the purpose of intelligent beings would explain it.
3. So the fact that we have such a universe makes it more likely that there was a powerful and Intelligent Creator to fine tune the universe to produce such beings.
Thoughts?
Some are better then others. Perhaps doctors should be required to tell people how well they did in school. Half of the doctors graduated in the lower half of their class. Still this is the whole point behind the Bible. The Bible is not based on man and man's authority. The Bible is based on God and God's authority. So the same God that created us and the entire universe is the God of the Bible.Since there don't seem to be any infallible miracle workers, fallible doctors are your best shot at staying alive and healthy.
Creation is evidence for a Creator. Even we learn about the Creator by our study of Creation.When did you show that such a creator exists at all?
Perhaps you can explain why you think this doesn't provide evidence that the universe with parameters that allow life is rare?I read through all the links and as you say not all of them dealt only with life on earth. But talking about other planets etc still does not support the premise you are arguing. The hypothesis that these articles suppet is that even in a universe where life is possible, it remains a rare, possibly even exclusive, occurrence. Again this does not help you support first premise that the universe with parameters that allow life is rare and that is the one you need to provide evidence for.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?