A perfect description of what you have been doing in this thread, trying to misrepresent a theory you don't like.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
White man speak with forked tongue.
Not today because they do all their planning on the computer. I am talking back when they did things on paper. It's just an old term. Of course when I was in college a computer was the size of a room. You had to punch holes in a piece of paper to feed information into the computer. So back then we still had drawing boards and still drafted our plans on paper.There is no such thing as "drawing board type of science". You are making stuff up. Is that what christians are called to do, make stuff up?
I think it is a lost cause. The guy I like has something like 1% of the vote right now.I feel like I am watching a presidential debate.
Sounds more like your trying to misrepresent me.A perfect description of what you have been doing in this thread, trying to misrepresent a theory you don't like.
Not today because they do all their planning on the computer. I am talking back when they did things on paper. It's just an old term. Of course when I was in college a computer was the size of a room. You had to punch holes in a piece of paper to feed information into the computer. So back then we still had drawing boards and still drafted our plans on paper.
Sounds more like your trying to misrepresent me.
Sort of like your home moves that you force everyone to watch over and over again.Cute. Irrelevant, but cute.
Here endeth even any attempt at maintaining the pretence of discussion.Sort of like your home moves that you force everyone to watch over and over again.
I think you got lost again. Did you forget to take your compass with you this morning?Completely irrelevant.
The theory of evolution is not on some drawing board. When we refuse to kill people with a genetic marker it doesn't mean that we have rejected the theory of evolution, or that it is still on the drawing board. All you are doing is throwing mud at a theory you don't like, and it makes you look foolish.
I think you got lost again. Did you forget to take your compass with you this morning?
Yep, you guys have me confused back tracking and running around in circles the way you do. None of this defends your position. It is all a smoke screen. Let me help you out here. The point your trying to defend is that Darwin was a racist. Some say yes, some say no. The defense for Darwin is that people claim he did not make racist statements. Yet all the known racists including Hitler based their supremacist beliefs on Darwin's theory. The sub title of his book was: "Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life." Just saying there is a "favoured race" is racism in and of itself. Just suggesting that there is a struggle between races is racism. My son is biracial and the funny thing is he claims that NO one has ever guessed what race he is. They make lots of guesses at what his race might be, but they do not ever get it right. Back in Darwin's day they might have believed that there was a "favoured race" but today science does not even believe that races exist. So according to science Darwin's book is a myth. Maybe that is why evolutionists go around calling everything a myth, because Darwin's theory is a myth.Cognitive dissonance anyone?
Like I said when the Evolutionists can not defend their pet theory then they start running around in circles and trying to create a smoke screen to hide the fact that they have failed to defend their beloved theory.Could be a language barrier issue. That seems to be the root of threads that get this bizarre.
I think Dunning-Kruger has a lot to do with it. People who are considered smart within their own little backwoods echo chambers, but actually have no idea what they're talking about and double down trying to defend their made up ad hoc gibberish instead of admitting "hey, well actually maybe these people are better informed than me!"Could be a language barrier issue. That seems to be the root of threads that get this bizarre.
I think Dunning-Kruger has a lot to do with it. People who are considered smart within their own little backwoods echo chambers, but actually have no idea what they're talking about and double down trying to defend their made up ad hoc gibberish instead of admitting "hey, well actually maybe these people are better informed than me!"
Yep, you guys have me confused back tracking and running around in circles the way you do. None of this defends your position. It is all a smoke screen. Let me help you out here. The point your trying to defend is that Darwin was a racist. Some say yes, some say no. The defense for Darwin is that people claim he did not make racist statements. Yet all the known racists including Hitler based their supremacist beliefs on Darwin's theory. The sub title of his book was: "Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life." Just saying there is a "favoured race" is racism in and of itself. Just suggesting that there is a struggle between races is racism. My son is biracial and the funny thing is he claims that NO one has ever guessed what race he is. They make lots of guesses at what his race might be, but they do not ever get it right. Back in Darwin's day they might have believed that there was a "favoured race" but today science does not even believe that races exist. So according to science Darwin's book is a myth. Maybe that is why evolutionists go around calling everything a myth, because Darwin's theory is a myth.
"In 1950, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) issued a statement asserting that all humans belong to the same species and that “race” is not a biological reality but a myth. This was a summary of the findings of an international panel of anthropologists, geneticists, sociologists, and psychologists.
A great deal of evidence had accumulated by that time to support this conclusion, and the scientists involved were those who were conducting research and were most knowledgeable about the topic of human variation. "
http://www.newsweek.com/there-no-such-thing-race-283123
Interesting article on Hitler the creationist
http://scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2006/08/28/hitler-the-creationist/
He was a creationist who banned Darwins books.
Yet all the known racists including Hitler based their supremacist beliefs on Darwin's theory. The sub title of his book was: "Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life." Just saying there is a "favoured race" is racism in and of itself.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?