Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yes, indeed: Your assertion about me was wrong.Yeah it's the same result.
Your question has been answered. Upon you altering the question, the modified question has also been answered.And since you won't answer
Please be so kind and show me where I did that, or retract your claim.I'll just put you down as one who accepts each and every esoteric truth claim, as you said in an earlier post.
Yes, indeed: Your assertion about me was wrong.
You have not answered. I asked: Then on what grounds do you disbelieve it?Your question has been answered. Upon you altering the question, the modified question has also been answered.
Please be so kind and show me where I did that, or retract your claim.
You know that you are wrong with your mind-reading when I tell you that you are wrong.If you don't answer, I don't know if I'm wrong.
You have not answered. I asked: Then on what grounds do you disbelieve it?
You said:
It´s not like I don´t believe your statement:
"If a Christian says he has esoteric knowledge you believe you should disbelieve that fact."
It´s that I tell you it´s untrue. Simply because I know better than you what I believe or don´t believe.
You are overstepping your boundaries when trying to tell me what I believe or don´t believe
I'm not sure what you're saying there, but it's not an answer to the question.
So you altered this quote significantly, in that you removed one of the two options.In post # 50 you said:
At this point I see only two options:
Either accept each and every esoteric truth claim, or reject them all.
You know that you are wrong with your mind-reading when I tell you that you are wrong.
I don´t even have grounds for evaluating it, in the first place.
Ah, I thought you still were at the point where it was about the inaccuracy of your initial statement. Where I come from, when we are called upon a false statement about someone else, we first acknowledge our mistake - and then move on to the next question.
So you altered this quote significantly, in that you removed one of the two options.
And, come to think of it, there´s even a third option: Just ignore them.
Well, it was you who made an unasked for positive truth claim about this "esoteric" issue (i.e. my mind set), in the first place.But you're just saying it. It's esoteric. I have no grounds for evaluating it.
I'm not sure what you mean by that.To the OP:
Is there then no such thing as what its "like" to be religious?
To the OP:
Is there then no such thing as what its "like" to be religious?
We are fishers of men. You are fish who won't evolve. Perhaps I'll start another thread by that name.
The idea of evolution is that fish evolved and came forth from the sea as higher forms of life. Most atheists embrace the concept when it comes to fish and every other species...but Noooo...not for themselves, that would be delusional, crazy talk!You are a fisher of bad analogies.
Seriously though...I have no idea what you mean by this.
We are fishers of men. You are fish who won't evolve. Perhaps I'll start another thread by that name.
The idea of evolution is that fish evolved and came forth from the sea as higher forms of life. Most atheists embrace the concept when it comes to fish and every other species...but Noooo...not for themselves, that would be delusional, crazy talk!
So, they're like fish who just chose not to come out, not to evolve.
Whatever.
Well...maybe...I'm a cowboy and you're a mermaidI see. In this analogy, you're the "evolved fish" who walked onto land...and I'm the basic fish still swimming in the sea, is that it?
Well...maybe...I'm a cowboy and you're a mermaid, but yeah, something like that.
Seriously though...I have no idea what you mean by this.
Einstein "thought" science, but he walked "evolution". His science advanced his generation, but his walk advance his species. He discovered the error of his work: science advances, but truth does not.Cute. You know...there's something that I've always wanted to ask you...
Why call your book "Walking like Einstein"? Surely you realize that the way Einstein walked isn't of interest to anyone...what's interesting is the way he thought. Why not "Thinking like Einstein"?
I realize that your book isn't actually about the way he thought, it appears to be more about your personal misunderstanding of science, but it doesn't seem to be about the way he walked either. At least with "Thinking like Einstein" you could've sold a few copies to people who didn't look into what the book is about before buying.
Confusion is the order of the day. Genesis 11:9 But truth is a mystery worth seeking.@ScottA please don't take this the wrong way, but this seems to be a fairly common and prevalent problem in discussions with you. I don't think it's just us.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?