Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
They only blew it up because that's where Obama's *REAL* birth certificate AND proof that the moonlanding is fake was housed.
The wiring, mostly. Hubby says that the wiring of such charges couldn't be easily concealed. Maybe he's part of the conspiracy, huh?It's not amazing if you don't assume they were working in broad daylight during business hours. How do you know they didn't go in at 2am and work till 4am for a number of weeks? Hint * check to see who was in charge of the security firm for the buildings...
Yes they are pretty involved - and generally the people who believe the towers were rigged acknowledge that it would have taken weeks and careful planning, as well as special security clearance and definitely working at night outside of normal operating hours.
The wiring, mostly. Hubby says that the wiring of such charges couldn't be easily concealed. Maybe he's part of the conspiracy, huh?
And yeah, a demolition crew doing all the jackhammering and all at night when noone's around to notice, and clean up everything before anyone gets in for work. No late night dog walkers or tourists in the area either, apparently.
Wait, I know! Silenced jackhammers!
Oh yeah, the "traces of thermite" thing is another pet hate of his. Thermite is mix of aluminium and iron oxide. And when you smack an aluminium aircraft into a steel framed building, what would you expect to find in the ruble?One "theory" is that there was a "super nanothermite", so it could be placed surrepticioulsy by painting it on. The only way that would be possible without detection is by trained rodents or a cadre of nanorobots using nano brushes.
It's amazing that you can still Keep fighting the good fight ManFromUncle, although I think it's pointless here. Check my post history, I've tried.
One would think that if they really believed it was all a conspiracy, they would ignore the thread and not bother to try keep others from learning about it.
Actually, the is method to my madness. I was taken in by arguments of the Father of the Modern Conspiracy, Mark Lane (Rush to Judgment) after hearing him lecture on the JFK assassination. That got me to read the Warren Commission report. Now this was before the internet and your only source of information (You Tube). Back then one had to slog through real books and publications.
Over the years I saw how Lane was not really concerned about truth, but was making a great living off anti-government paranoia and sentiment and dissillusionment. Lane was into anything where there was a conspiracy to be made. He was one of the survivors of the Peoples Temple mass murder and claimed that the US government had agitators placed there and even had soldiers shooting some of the victims.
So, what I learned was how it takes a few abiguous facts, a crafty pitchman and a willing-to-suspend logic audience to get a conspiracy theory going. Thanks to YouTube, it's easier than ever.
So, don't show me some crap on You Tube and somebody's blog repeating somebody else's blog and expect me to buy it.
So one bad guy makes them all bad. Is that how it works. So all priests are bad because some molested children. All doctors are bad because some misdiagnosed their patient. Your logic on this is very bad so all your logic must be bad. So we are to believe what the wealthy want us to believe because?
So, more evidence about the decline in reading skills. Lane is the prototype. Just like any product sales or marketing plan, there is a formula. What I am telling you--- please read closely because you won't find it on YouTube--- is that following Lane taught me the schtick. That's one way I assess whether a theory might be bogus. I compare that with the evidence. The conspiracy industry is big business.
As you point out, it is important to consider the agendas of the people involved.
The wiring, mostly. Hubby says that the wiring of such charges couldn't be easily concealed. Maybe he's part of the conspiracy, huh?
And yeah, a demolition crew doing all the jackhammering and all at night when noone's around to notice, and clean up everything before anyone gets in for work. No late night dog walkers or tourists in the area either, apparently.
Wait, I know! Silenced jackhammers!
Now isn't it a coincidence that Marvin Bush, George's little brother, was on the board of the company which had the security contract for the entire WTC. That means access to any part of the building night and day, floor plans, and control over the security cameras.Sullivan stated that he knew from the first day that the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 on 9/11 was a classic controlled implosion. Asked how he thought it might have been done he posited, “looking at the building it wouldn’t be a problem — once you gain access to the elevator shafts…then a team of expert loaders would have hidden access to the core columns and beams. The rest can be accomplished with just the right kind of explosives for the job. Thermite can be used as well.”
Here is another part of the interview with demolition expert Tom Sullivan:October 1996: Security Firm with Connections to Bush Family Acquires Security Contract for World Trade Center
Marvin Bush. [Source: Eric Draper / White House]A security company called Stratesec acquires an $8.3 million contract to help provide security at the World Trade Center. It is one of numerous contractors hired in the upgrade of security at the WTC following the 1993 bombing. Stratesec, which was formerly called Securacom, is responsible for installing the “security-description plan”—the layout of the electronic security system—at the World Trade Center. It has a “completion contract” to provide some of the center’s security “up to the day the buildings fell down,” according to Barry McDaniel, its CEO.
Directors Include Bush Family Member - Marvin P. Bush, the youngest brother of future President George W. Bush, is a director at Stratesec from 1993 to June 2000, when most of its work on these big projects is done. Wirt D. Walker III, a distant relative of George W. Bush, is chairman of the board at Stratesec from 1992, and its CEO from 1999 until January 2002. Another of Stratesec’s directors, from 1991 to 2001, is Mishal Yousef Saud Al Sabah, who is a member of the Kuwaiti royal family.
So the bottom line is you don't need cords all over the place anymore. As for people walking their dogs at night and not noticing people going in and out of the towers, you must be from a small town. NYC isn't like that. It's the city that never sleeps and the WTC complex is like a small city unto itself, with trucks going in and out multiple entrances across a square mile into underground garages, NYC traffic everywhere. Nobody cares or asks what anybody else is doing. The Towers held 30,000 workers. That's a lot of maintenance crews, food for the cafeterias and restaurants, office supplies, contractors for one thing or another, round-the-clock computer workers and what all. If you think it would be hard to do the wiring work unnoticed you don't understand the Big Apple.Brent Blanchard, the photographer from the controlled demolition company Protec, has said, in criticism of the CD theory, that there would have had to been detonation cords strung all over the place and casings left in the rubble pile from the cutter charges. So we asked for a response from Sullivan. He noted that:
“Remote wireless detonators have been available for years. Look at any action movie — and of course the military has them. The reason most contractors don’t use them is that they are too expensive — but in a project with a huge budget it would be no problem.
But I only see you using official evidence and mocking any other evidence that might be produced. Or mocking others that may be producing evidence. Thats seems like a foolish way to come up with your conclusions. You will not watch or use any information other than the official version put out by very wealthy people that only have money, greed and power as their main purpose. Your government is big business ,also, they have put enough people like you in positions of power to even be able to change the laws so that they are not breaking them. They were able to put enough people in these positions to make the law that corporations are people. I would love to see one of these corporations get executed like they do to people. I know there is no changing your ways, and I am will not try to. But why must you try to change ours. Because you will not succeed with such closeminded veiws.
The protocols of the elders of zion was the prototype. Just like any product sales or marketing plan, there is a formula. But this got dissed ,also.
None of this addresses the impossibility of any mass falling through steel at the same speed as it falls through air. Picking out questions that don't seem to make sense to you at first doesn't change the laws of physics, or the impossibility of the official story.
Conjecture.As for wiring, Tom Sullivan of Controlled Demolitioms Inc., which did some clean-up work at the WTC, says this:
Now isn't it a coincidence that Marvin Bush, George's little brother, was on the board of the company which had the security contract for the entire WTC. That means access to any part of the building night and day, floor plans, and control over the security cameras.
HistoryCommons.org
Here is another part of the interview with demolition expert Tom Sullivan:
So the bottom line is you don't need cords all over the place anymore. As for people walking their dogs at night and not noticing people going in and out of the towers, you must be from a small town. NYC isn't like that. It's the city that never sleeps and the WTC complex is like a small city unto itself, with trucks going in and out multiple entrances across a square mile into underground garages, NYC traffic everywhere. Nobody cares or asks what anybody else is doing. The Towers held 30,000 workers. That's a lot of maintenance crews, food for the cafeterias and restaurants, office supplies, contractors for one thing or another, round-the-clock computer workers and what all. If you think it would be hard to do the wiring work unnoticed you don't understand the Big Apple.
None of this addresses the impossibility of any mass falling through steel at the same speed as it falls through air. Picking out questions that don't seem to make sense to you at first doesn't change the laws of physics, or the impossibility of the official story.
As for wiring, Tom Sullivan of Controlled Demolitioms Inc., which did some clean-up work at the WTC, says this:
Now isn't it a coincidence that Marvin Bush, George's little brother, was on the board of the company which had the security contract for the entire WTC. That means access to any part of the building night and day, floor plans, and control over the security cameras.
HistoryCommons.org
Here is another part of the interview with demolition expert Tom Sullivan:
So the bottom line is you don't need cords all over the place anymore. As for people walking their dogs at night and not noticing people going in and out of the towers, you must be from a small town. NYC isn't like that. It's the city that never sleeps and the WTC complex is like a small city unto itself, with trucks going in and out multiple entrances across a square mile into underground garages, NYC traffic everywhere. Nobody cares or asks what anybody else is doing. The Towers held 30,000 workers. That's a lot of maintenance crews, food for the cafeterias and restaurants, office supplies, contractors for one thing or another, round-the-clock computer workers and what all. If you think it would be hard to do the wiring work unnoticed you don't understand the Big Apple.
Marvin Bush:
9/11 Security Courtesy of Marvin Bush
All your links so far have failed to produce hard evidence. The first link is by someone in the CD business- fair enough. All we hear is his opinions. No hard facts. No hard evidence.
What does that have to do with BBC News and WTC? The reporter announced, reporting LIVE and ON LOCATION that WTC had gone down while it was standing right behind her. She jumped the gun by 26 minutes.
Now, put on your thinking cap. If this were such a well-managed conspiracy by the government, how could they possibly have fed this information, then allowed the correspondent to stand in front of it and say that it was down?
It is actually more logical that she (and the production staff talking in her ear) goofed. It was not a big leap to expect the building to collapse.
So, either the government or whatever was so highly-oiled and this was so well-planned or it wasn't. It cannot be both, as you want to have it.
LOL it's not a big leap to expect a shooting victim to die so let's just announce he has died and get it over with. What is logical about that?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?