Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Do you now admit rom ch7 refers specifically to applicable NC law?Paul did not know about New Covenant Law as a Pharisee in his struggle in trying to keep the Old Law in Romans 7:14-24. Yes, it so happens that it was also a New Covenant Law he struggled with keeping. But Paul in no way is saying the command to "do not covet" is abrogated. He makes this fact clear in Ephesians 5:5. In Romans 3:1 and Galatians 5:2 Paul condemns the old command of circumcision or "circumcision salvationism" (Which is a part of the Old Law). This is why Paul says we are to serve in newness of spirit and not in the oldness of the letter (Romans 7:6). Paul's point is that we are not under the Old Law and that by trying to stay under that Old Law and Old way without Jesus, one is going to never overcome sin in this life. For there are laws on animal sacrifices that no longer apply anymore because Jesus is our sacrifice. But to suggest all laws or commands are abrogated under the New Testament is silly. 1 John 3:23 says that we are to believe on Jesus as Christ gave us commandment. If we are not under commands or laws, then we are not under 1 John 3:23, too. But this is clearly not the case. There are laws that are still applicable to keep (salvation wise) for the believer today.
...
Jason, you are not here to seek glory for God, but praise from menAll laws (applicable for their time) are righteous. Ephesians 5:5 shows that you are in error in regards to the moral law being necessary to keep as a part of our salvation.
...
So lets just cut to the chase, are you too claiming no good works necessary to get into heaven, and bad works cannot keep us out as long as we believe?
nope, didn't say that. i said it was a fine line between good works and a proper state of the heart. the narrow path. relying too much on good works is self-righteousness and we cannot save ourselves this way.
nope, didn't say that. i said it was a fine line between good works and a proper state of the heart. the narrow path. relying too much on good works is self-righteousness and we cannot save ourselves this way.
While I am not a big Dan Corner fan, he does make a great eye opening point here in regards to this "Double Message within Eternal Security."
To see what I am talking about, here is a video debate between Dan Corner and Mark Driscoll.
Mark Driscoll Mars Hill Church Dan Corner Debate
...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?