Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That's unbelievers' job.Christianity misapplied and misinterpreted can also have tragic results. I don't see you complaining about that though?
I don't see academians complaining about misapplied and misinterpreted science either.
So they went ahead and used hydrogen anyway?The USA didn’t allow them to buy helium.
. Some of our technology is dangerous. Duh! We try to make it as safe as possible but things happen. The Hindenburg was struck by lightningSo they went ahead and used hydrogen anyway?
Did they have a disclaimer on their tickets?
WARNING: This ship uses hydrogen for lift. Enjoy the trip at your own risk.
Hydrogen was used because it was cheaper, readily available and provided more lift than helium. The passengers were fully informed and given safety instruction. The real danger and serious engineering error was that the skin of the airship was doped with cellulose acetate (highly inflammable) mixed with powdered aluminum (explosive) which caught fire first. The hydrogen didn't ignite until the gas cells were burned through from the outside.So they went ahead and used hydrogen anyway?
Did they have a disclaimer on their tickets?
WARNING: This ship uses hydrogen for lift. Enjoy the trip at your own risk.
No, it wasn't.The Hindenburg was struck by lightning
You're saying it would have crashed anyway?Hydrogen was used because it was cheaper, readily available and provided more lift than helium. The passengers were fully informed and given safety instruction. The real danger and serious engineering error was that the skin of the airship was doped with cellulose acetate (highly inflammable) mixed with powdered aluminum (explosive) which caught fire first. The hydrogen didn't ignite until the gas cells were burned through from the outside.
You're saying it would have crashed anyway?
Then they should let them explain it with your pseudoscience, shouldn't they?We’re saying that despite your attempts to derail , creationists can’t explain natural phenomena with their pseudoscience ...
the patriarchal based misogyny you’re going to blame on unbelievers? The abuse of science that has lasted for the last 400 years you’re going to blame on unbelievers? I was going to write LOL but the stupid evil things done in the name of religion aren’t funny.
Somehow I got the wrong quote sorry
Um what are you talking about ?No idea what all that means, but if it's directed at me, and you want a reply you'll need to help me out a bit.
FWIW, if you have any questions on how to reply to a post, so we know who you are replying to, just ask, posters are generally very helpful. It's something we all had to ask about or figure out so not biggie.
Natural phenomena is natural phenomena.I’m still waiting for a coherent creationist explanation of natural phenomena.
Natural phenomena is natural phenomena.
It is nature obeying the laws of God.
Or, if you prefer, it is nature obeying the laws of nature that God created.
(Snip).
How was science misapplied or misinterpreted in this instance? Please be specific.Science misapplied and misinterpreted can have tragic results.
Man, this thread is just off the rails.
So, it is safe to say that creationism does not offer an explicit explanation for specific biological cases. That neither creationism nor ID have any chance whatsoever of supplanting evolutionary theory as the best explanation of biological diversity we have?
Case closed? Anything else relevant to add?
That is correct.The nature that God created isn’t the one in the Bible.
Then you assume incorrectly, unless you're talking about after the Fall, when God created a new nature.Brightmoon said:I do understand that you believe that it is ...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?