So you're suggesting that the light is actually produced by the ring and subsequently arrives at the star 8 months before it left?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Great, and to do that, would we not start by seeing what speed light goes from core to ring, and indeed, if we are even sure it isn't visa versa or something!!??
Try and pay attention, Thau This is what I referred to, in the quote
"there will still be an infinite set of prime numbers"
Great. Well, thanks for stopping by, and trying to make fun of others you think do not understand it either.
As for me, I couldn't care less about either way. Will that help them when we order them to clean up the planet when the millennium starts??
Great, and so you still don't understand it you admit!
Fat lot of good it seems to have done.
Doesn't seem to take much to impress you.
Oh, an honest lawyer, as well as one who likes puzzles that waste a lot of time? Great.
Right, you are full of advice to. How nice.
Maybe you could concentrate on answering what is actually asked. The result, likely would be topical.
another threadful of assumptionsIt is your theories that are myth, the bible is absolute. I found Dodwell's curve
well, you found some of history anyway. there's still an awful lot left prior to 4400 B.C. that you haven't come to terms with yet. that's a topic for another time, though.and history as well.
nothing, i know better than to ask for much :IWhat more could one want??
according to you, light at the "advent of the universe," as well as in the now-distant universe, moved however fast it liked. this was your way of explaining away the supernova, remember? trouble is, direct observation suggests that that light moved at a uniform pace; the distant universe isn't a jumbled mess.If the stars we were supposed to see at the advent of the universe change were in the sky, how is it they would be disorderly??
i always assumed that they distance themselves from you because you make them look insane by association :IA different universe really does explain things. We don't need to know it all at the moment, but that sure covers it all.
Ever notice that bible wizs don't bug me on the idea much?? There is a reason.
you should look into philosophy, a couple of the guys i'm reading right now for my ethics course are almost as mindbending as youThere ought to be a diploma for that.
Not sure of the point here. You claimed that, I think it was, languages go back 5500 years, no??? You were asked to prove it, and could not. Instead you seem to insinuate that you lean to the bible record???
If you do, then realize that the tower of babel was not that long ago, and that is where languages began.
Likely, it was no language that came after. What changed, in my opinion, was the universe, which affected the brain of man, and the way he processes information. I read how, when the spiritual was added again, in the book of Acts, all men heard the apostle in their own tongue. (or thought they did)I know the idea is that they all spoke the same language. What language was it?
Why? Is there something I, or someone else said that you feel is somehow off the mark?dad could I please have your definition of a deceiver please???
Don't think I think man was stupid before the flood, or the split. If anything we devolved some since then. But they did use pictures to communicate. I hear that the origianl meanings may have changed as time went on, for the pictures? If so, why, we might even ask if the Rosetta stuff was from a later take on the pics.The Egyptians were a highly developed society. They weren't just communicating with "pictures" any more than the Chinese just communicate with pictures. That's why it isn't immediately obvious what the text is just by looking at the pictures. That's why we needed to find the ROSETTA STONE to help us decipher heiroglyphics.
Language progressed since the early days. This is news??Even the LATIN ALPHABET like we use today has origins in Phoenecian pictograms if I recall my world history classes! I believe the letter A is an upside down representation of the phoenecian symbol for cow...which is what it kinda looks like if you turn it upside down! Check it out here (it's also related to the Hebrew letter aleph).
My point, exactly.Egyptian heiroglyphics are one of the oldest languages in the world!
Not really, I was asking what we actually know. Or something.So you're suggesting that the light is actually produced by the ring and subsequently arrives at the star 8 months before it left?
I don't usually question what I couldn't care less about.I thought you were questioning Fermat's Last Theorem.
Call the bible anything you like. That's the way it is.Now, now, Dad. It isn't healthy to you to fantasize about subjugating other people. Turning other people into your servants isn't a nice dream to have. Remember, everyone is a worthwhile person and you should remember that. Even when you get mad at someone.
Yes, glad to hear, after 300 years, you still don't get it.But it did some good! I was able to post some useful information about how people have proven Fermat's Last theorem which was part of Fish's post!
Great, maybe ride the horse head stick around the room a bit to, fun is OK.So we can all work toward learning new things!
Hopefully they understand some of that.Fermat didn't waste a lot of time! The man is responsible for the foundations that lead to calculus. That has been one of the greatest advances in mathematics and how we are able to do so much of what we do today in science! The Calculus underlies a HUGE portion of science!
In the meantime I'm going to continue to try to answer your questions in as friendly a manner as I possibly can. Please don't get mean or nasty when I answer your questions or provide you with some more information!
An awful lot dated falsely, but that means nothing.another threadful of assumptions
well, you found some of history anyway. there's still an awful lot left prior to 4400 B.C. that you haven't come to terms with yet. that's a topic for another time, though.
nothing, i know better than to ask for much :I
Well, I raised a few ideas of how the former state may have worked. As I said, no need to lock into one claim, since you know nothing about anything but the fishbowl. But, if light was non uniform in speed, and the new state came, why, it would then be uniform, would it not? One, then can't look at the uniform light, and declare it had to also be uniform then, unless one proved a same state past.according to you, light at the "advent of the universe," as well as in the now-distant universe, moved however fast it liked. this was your way of explaining away the supernova, remember? trouble is, direct observation suggests that that light moved at a uniform pace; the distant universe isn't a jumbled mess.
No, we are in this state now, it is a uniform light, as far as we can tell. Although, listening to posters here so far, I am beginning to wonder.saying that we are "supposed" to see the distant universe as being orderly doesn't excuse this. if God is micromanaging the light to make it orderly, that implies that He is manipulating the speed of that light to make it uniform, which only serves to undermine your point.
Well, no. If the universe was changed, and light here is constant, no one is deceiving anyone, but themselves, by assuming this state always was.if He is only making the speed of the light appear to be uniform when it is actually moving at any given speed, then He's deceiving mankind for the sake of aesthetics, or worse, because He feels like it. and that's ridiculous!
Well, if you knew a bit about it, why you might realize that mounting a bible case against the concept is pretty well near impossible, far as I can tell.i always assumed that they distance themselves from you because you make them look insane by association :I
Wild ideas don't interest me, what interests me is facts, and evidence, and bible basis. Monks arguing over how many angels can fit on the head of a pin, or philosophers arguing over how many singularities can fir on the head of a pin I find silly, and time wasting.you should look into philosophy, a couple of the guys i'm reading right now for my ethics course are almost as mindbending as you
No idea what you are talking about.So you do refute the validity of the Bible. Well Don't say I did not try. Perhaps you will be forgiven for your transgressions.
I pray for you Brother!
They all spoke the same language. That was right after the flood. I think some have guessed as to where in the historical area it was, that the tower may have been started.
But I consider the fact that Egypt resorted to basically communicating with pictures as proof.
No idea what you are talking about.
As for the Egyptian pictures they are called Hieroglyphs and are a written language....
Play the fool all you want; but, your transgressions will not go unnoticed by the lord! You have transgressed against the bible innumerable times. Profess not your guilt to me for you shall be judged on a higher plane.
You have never shown any evidence that standard archeological dates are off by the thousands of years you need them to be off for your mythology to be correct.An awful lot dated falsely, but that means nothing.
Well, I raised a few ideas of how the former state may have worked. As I said, no need to lock into one claim, since you know nothing about anything but the fishbowl. But, if light was non uniform in speed, and the new state came, why, it would then be uniform, would it not? One, then can't look at the uniform light, and declare it had to also be uniform then, unless one proved a same state past.
No, we are in this state now, it is a uniform light, as far as we can tell. Although, listening to posters here so far, I am beginning to wonder.
Well, no. If the universe was changed, and light here is constant, no one is deceiving anyone, but themselves, by assuming this state always was.
Well, if you knew a bit about it, why you might realize that mounting a bible case against the concept is pretty well near impossible, far as I can tell.
Wild ideas don't interest me,What a statement to come from a guy who says there was no gravity before the flood, talks about time running backwards, posted a thread on the earth not rotating and expects to spend eternity in a city of transparent gold boiking Marilyn Monroe and other famous beauties and says that Elvis may be residing in the moon. You have nothing but wild ideas and have never backed up any of them. No wonder some people still think you are an "evolutionist" trying to make YEC look silly. Whether you are trying or not you are certainly succeeding.
We will get to that can you answer my question first?Why? Is there something I, or someone else said that you feel is somehow off the mark?
So, what language was Genesis originally written in?Likely, it was no language that came after. What changed, in my opinion, was the universe, which affected the brain of man, and the way he processes information. I read how, when the spiritual was added again, in the book of Acts, all men heard the apostle in their own tongue. (or thought they did)
No, I simply noted that a math wiz ought to be able to come up with some little formula for the non constant former light. In other words, using two stars, each with a different speed that day.
Is to, nya nya.
A behavior?? Are you sure it might not be something more like a measurement of time, that is beyond our current ability to comprehend?
How would you know, you don't so much as know what it is?
In box thinking. If i (infinity) = something that is beyond any number in our universe, how would you make a bigger one?
I don't do baby math.
A grown up person would recognize temporal state math as baby math.
As defined by a finite thinker in the fishbowl of this finite universe state. So?
I understand you think so, naturally.
Relax, 2 = 2 is four. I simply wanted to see if that was any sort of stumper for you.
Hey, it's what I do. Explain stuff.
Yes, glad to hear, after 300 years, you still don't get it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?