• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Hexa

Regular Member
Jan 19, 2006
355
11
40
✟23,867.00
Faith
Protestant

I never said that. I said people were lucky to be born into a country with a benifits systemsuch as ours, implying that if they were born else where in the world, or even in a different period of our history then they would not recieve the benifits they recieve now.Never did I say that becuase other people dont recieve it we shouldn't.
 
Upvote 0

Bish bash bosh

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2011
1,109
10
✟1,414.00
Faith
Pantheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Labour

It has nothing whatsoever to do with `luck`. It has everything to do with what our forefathers fought and many died for.

We are not in a different country neither would we ever find ourself in an alternative period of history.

What an irrational argument.

Bish
 
Upvote 0

Hexa

Regular Member
Jan 19, 2006
355
11
40
✟23,867.00
Faith
Protestant

I think your either miss understanding my replies or I'm not explaining myself proper.

And your irrational use of the term irrational makes me think your the biggest plantpot I have ever "met."
 
Upvote 0

lismore

Maranatha
Oct 28, 2004
20,989
4,640
Scotland
✟298,797.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I thought the point was it was a safety net that saves you from becoming homeless or starving to death by reviving money from that which has been deducted from peoples taxes...

But the example I used above. Someone can work for years then find themselves unemployed and be turned down for any benefits.

While on the other hand someone who doesn't want to work can be kept by the state.

What is the incentive to work or save? The worker can pay his taxes, then find no safety net for him.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Gadarene

-______-
Apr 16, 2012
11,461
2,507
London
✟90,247.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Labour

That sounds like an incentive to save.
 
Upvote 0

non-religious

Veteran
Mar 4, 2005
2,500
163
52
Herts
✟26,017.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Yeah because everyone is capable of saving

I agree with what Genersis said. The system is there to help those who, for whatever reason, have fallen on hard times and require financial assistance. People will always abuse the system, but as long as it is helping the overwhelming majority of genuine claimants then that is fine with me.

Benefit fraud should be addressed, but there are too many families out there who desperately need that help and I'm proud of the fact that we have a system that helps.

Have a nice day
 
Upvote 0

ebia

Senior Contributor
Jul 6, 2004
41,711
2,142
A very long way away. Sometimes even further.
✟54,775.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens

The've been plugging that line as long as I can remember. Why stop now?
 
Upvote 0

ebia

Senior Contributor
Jul 6, 2004
41,711
2,142
A very long way away. Sometimes even further.
✟54,775.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
The OP has tied up two substantially different things.

The benefit system needs to pay out enough to live on for those who need it. Therefore there will always be some who decide they are happy with that and try to avoid finding work. The system tries to discourage that by having requirements to look for work, etc, but that becomes a law of diminishing returns. There will always be a few that get away with it unless you spend far more trying to catch them out than they are costing.

The issue of someone who finds themselves unemployed but with sufficient savings to support themselves for a time is an entirely separate issue.
 
Upvote 0

Miser

Faith Squad!
Aug 1, 2011
444
36
Lancaster
✟29,191.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I see a LOT of hatred on media websites and papers towards people on benefits. I believe this is incredibly unfair, the vast majority are in need of genuine help. I myself was on incapacity benefit due to mental health issues, and seeing what the Daily Mail wrote about "benefit scroungers" was devastating to me.

Please, do not judge people who need financial support, you may find yourself there one day.
 
Upvote 0

DavePotter

Newbie
Mar 20, 2012
12
1
✟22,637.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
It would be better if work pays.
Due to the high cost of housing (mortgages and rents, especially in the south) minimum wages would need to be a lot higher than they are now. Though I see there are a minority who do abuse the system, most are honest people in need of support, who would rather work if it paid to do so.

Dave.
 
Upvote 0

Bish bash bosh

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2011
1,109
10
✟1,414.00
Faith
Pantheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Labour
Yeah it seems that someone in receipt of housing benefit, income support, child benefit etc... will have to find a job that pays just as much in order to make ends meet. Perhaps they would have to earn even more. It's a vicious cycle.

The pertinent point.

Where is the incentive for any low skilled manual worker to take a job which pass the same or less as what he is receiving from the government?

Bish
 
Upvote 0