Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Perhaps you should post a list of questions that should not be asked and comments that should not be made. In that way you wouldn't get questions you are unwilling or unable to answer and, on balance, the world would be a happier place.Then keep it out of this thread please.
Perhaps you should post a list of questions that should not be asked and comments that should not be made.
Because what you are declining to answer appears not only relevant to topic, but goes to the heart of it. More than one member has made that point repeatedly. Refusal to answer creates the impression you are not inviting questions in good faith. If you are indifferent to having your action interpreted in that way . . keep on trucking.Why would I have to?
Because what you are declining to answer appears not only relevant to topic, but goes to the heart of it. More than one member has made that point repeatedly. Refusal to answer creates the impression you are not inviting questions in good faith. If you are indifferent to having your action interpreted in that way . . keep on trucking.
So you want only softball questions. Nothing challenging. At the first challenge you want to cancel the questioner.Then keep it out of this thread please.
Anything you see, you see well after the creation week in 4004 BC, and is not the subject of this Q&A thread.
You only display weakness and insecurity.
How unfortunate. I was editing my post while you were replying. Do you mind to read it again?Either that or I expose it.
So you are saying the fundamental nature of the universe changed?It does today.
But not during the Creation Week, when things came into existence suddenly and fully mature.
I would argue that this rewritten history is not actually history...But history does NOT require maturity.
Gubberments and farmassies rewrote history (oh, wait, long before this religion did too),
so they could 'claim' <falsely> they had support or evidence they were right and could continue to oppress the poor even though mentas non competence .
So you are saying the fundamental nature of the universe changed?
Please describe these changes in detail.
I would argue that this rewritten history is not actually history...
@AV1611VET: you should read my signature and think about what it says. I want my opinions to be challenged and tested. And if they don't pass the test I will feel liberated.
Yeah, it doesn't work when you use the claim as evidence for the claim.Yup.
I'll give you what the Bible gives:
Genesis 3:16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.
17 And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life;
18 Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field;
19 In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return.
And with that, can we please stick to Genesis 1 & 2?
Yeah, it doesn't work when you use the claim as evidence for the claim.
You didn't understand at all what I was talking about, did you?
No, you merely repeated the claim.You asked for before-and-after evidence of change.
I gave you before-and-after evidence of change from the same Source.
Before: blessed ground, no thorns.
After: cursed ground, thorns.
What more do you want?
But for the record, let's keep this discussion within the bounds of Genesis 1 & 2 please.
Yeah, the conversation was literally talking about governments rewriting history.History is His story.
Unless you're talking secular history.
The claim is not evidence. The Bible is not evidence for the claims made within the Bible. By this logic, The Lord of the Rings is evidence that Middle Earth is real.
You need to provide external evidence.
Like I said, you didn't understand the actual conversation.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?