tactile sensory units, 2

justlookinla said:

Of course it's evidence of design. The comparable elements of complexity, functionality and purpose indicate one of two things....

1) Design is present in the tactile sensory units as evidenced by the shared elements within the designs.

2) The tactile sensory units are not designed but rather the products of willy-nilly, random, chance, haphazard creation.

Which will it be?

Click to expand...

justlookinla said:

Since the designer designed the circuitry.



Another thing is that this is about tactile sensory units. Do try to stay on topic if you wish to discuss the subject of the thread.



Electrical circuity is used to transmit, and receive, information. Elements of design.



Remember, tactile sensory units. When the sensor senses, information is produced. Information formatted to convey specific information. Programming is present to properly convey the information in a usable and repetitive manner.



If you believe that the tactile sensory units were designed, and created, for a purpose other than tactile sensory units, please present your reasoning for such a view.



Language is created to exchange ideas and views, convey information, record information, disseminate information. Where language is found, intelligence is an integral part of it.



Tactile sensory information is basically the same, touch something hot and the designed system goes to work.

Click to expand...

justlookinla said:

Complexity, functionality and purpose in tactile sensory units.

Click to expand...

SkyWriting said:

There are scores of structures that are designed on 3-d printers. They actually use cells to lay down
layers and build up a biological structure which they implant in people.
They custom make heart valves and implant them.

The design process is extensive.

3D bioprinting of tissues and organs

3-D printers could soon make human skin

Click to expand...

justlookinla said:

They'd certainly fall into the category of design.

Click to expand...