I tried my best to shoehorn myself into any of the alternatives and I thought the last one (before "other") was the easiest to start explaining from.
We don't have any really good reason to doubt that any of the miracles in the Bible happened if there is no reason to find physical evidence today that will contradict them. E.g. Jesus walks on water. We have no idea what physical constants He changed, how He changed them, and how long the effect lasted. In any case, we don't see anybody walking on water today, meaning that whatever physically happened has never happened again since. Therefore it would be really hard to disprove the historicality of Jesus walking on water.
On the other hand, the creation miracles YECs invoke would have left substantial evidence (unless one subscribes to Apparent Age-ism). TEs believe that the substantial evidence necessary to prove those creation miracles cannot be found today, in fact there appears to be substantial evidence against those creation miracles having happened in a detectable manner. Therefore given the existence of plausible alternative theological views we don't fancy YECism.
I think chaoschristian was right. A simple "what do you think about ... ?" question with you making clear that you didn't want debate posts would have done well or better. But I think that yes, you do have the right to know how we think, and I hope the written responses here have helped you there