Subduction Zone
Regular Member
Yes, and in my fantasies I am with Raquel Welch in her prime.
Aren't dreams wonderful?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yes, and in my fantasies I am with Raquel Welch in her prime.I'd love to see the look on peoples' faces if, during the Millennial Reign, Jesus gave a personal tour of the Creation Week ... taking evolutionists back in time to 4004 BC and letting them witness what the angels witnessed.
I'd say that, for some, that would constitute a real shock.
Linnaeus' dinosaurs may not have.Dinosaurs did not have navels.
Whatever."legendary" I believe to be the correct term. Like Bigfoot or Yeti.
No, Linnaeus did not know anything about dinosaurs. They were not even named until roughly 50 years after his death.Linnaeus' dinosaurs may not have.
God's did.
What's the binomen for an angel?
Or couldn't Linnaeus drag his science that deep?
There are just certain things that science, for all its glory, can't explain, isn't there?
Neither do those Christians.I don't see the problem for a Christian in accepting the theory that Behemoth was a folkloric creature.
How would you like it if I called you a Mangani?Speedwell said:Why do you think it needs to be a dinosaur?
I doubt Raquel would think so.Yes, and in my fantasies I am with Raquel Welch in her prime.
Aren't dreams wonderful?
Ah ... nice.No, Linnaeus did not know anything about dinosaurs.
Somehow I don't think he turned over in his grave about it.Subduction Zone said:They were not even named until roughly 50 years after his death.
Linnaeus' dinosaurs may not have.
God's did.
You do realize that, according to evolution, we "apes" are made in the image and likeness of God, right?It depends on how they were portrayed. I haven't read much Tarzan.
Other than entertainment value, would it change your mind about anything if you did see one?Can I see one?
I thought we were talking about personal fantasies.I doubt Raquel would think so.
Your problem with education seems to be that your beliefs are refuted at every turn and you refuse to engage with new ideas. Look up motivated reasoning and conformation bias.Whatever.
Some say Jesus is either: lunatic, liar, legend, or Lord.
I imagine if college can call Jesus a legend with a straight face, they can certainly call Behemoth one.
Try not being so literalistic. According to that sort of reasoning Jesus is a door.You do realize that, according to evolution, we "apes" are made in the image and likeness of God, right?
This means God is an ape.
Furthermore, if evolution is correct, a mutant, copy-error died on the Cross to effect our salvation.
Does that bother you?
Then a mosque would be evidence of Allah. A Hindu temple would be evidence of Shiva. Are you saying that your evidence of God is on the same order as that?Other than entertainment value, would it change your mind about anything if you did see one?
Can you, for example, see a church building as proof ... okay, evidence ... of God's existence?
Why do you think that is a problem of any sort?Ah ... nice.
The Father of Modern Taxonomy knew nothing about dinosaurs.
Oh, the irony.Somehow I don't think he turned over in his grave about it.
So what? According to your story He must be dust.You do realize that, according to evolution, we "apes" are made in the image and likeness of God, right?
This means God is an ape.
Disgusting.Furthermore, if evolution is correct, a mutant, copy-error died on the Cross to effect our salvation.
It bothers me that a Christian would willfully misrepresent what other Christians believe just to attempt to gain rhetorical advantage in an internet chatroom.Does that bother you?
We are.I thought we were talking about personal fantasies.
Why? And you do realize that the exact same claim could be made about your fantasy.We are.
I don't think Raquel would appreciate you dreaming about being with her in her prime.
Would you?
Other than entertainment value, would it change your mind about anything if you did see one?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?