So you just made up that stuff about “evolutionists” not understanding the difference between micro and macro evolution?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
ah...it's a concept...a theory...an explanation of how we get from speciation to what we see today....you know the THEORY OF EVOLUTION vs. evolution...wait..I thought you all were educated on the theory of evolution and you don't know what it is? How is that possible?
your the one who claimed to not know what I was talking about.So you just made up that stuff about “evolutionists” not understanding the difference between micro and macro evolution?
your the one who claimed to not know what I was talking about.
huh? Your post isn't making any sense....you might want to work on your communication skills so that I can follow what you want to communicate since your posts aren't doing the job for you.Really? Where was that?
No examples then, quelle surprise! Bit of a dishonest claim wasn’t it?
huh? Your post isn't making any sense....you might want to work on your communication skills so that I can follow what you want to communicate since your posts aren't doing the job for you.
I don’t understand what you are trying to say.I am officially asking everyone here to stop responding to me if it is not directly related to the original point I was making about so many people not listening well enough or long enough to know how much knowledge a creationist might have before passing judgment...you just might be surprised on occasion.
Was Lazarus an ordinary human man?I expect they're right. An ordinary human man will likely not come back to life after three days dead.
Oh yeah?Well, SAAB started as an airplane, and the original SAAB car was modelled on the cockpit of the airplane SAAB.The link was that they both had the same designer.
(SAAB no longer makes cars, though SAAB 9,3 is still produced in China. But SAAB still makes airplanes.)
93 percent of the members of the National Academy of Sciences, one of the most elite scientific organizations in the United States, do not believe in God.Do you have evidence to back that up, any statistics?
God has provided abundant evidence.Why would God expect anyone to believe he exists on no sufficient evidence?
We started with a wolf and ended out with hundreds of breeds of dogs, ok humans speeded the process up by acting replacing natural selection. It is estimated that we have been doing this for around 16,000 to 32,000 years - and look at the changes. Is it so hard to extend that and see that another 16,000 years and the Dog will be unable to mate with a Wolf and thus be a new species.
Fossil evidence mapping the evolution of different animals, found in the regions of the world you'd expect and in the time frames you'd expect.
Patterns of animal moves link in with evolution, you don't find a Kangaroo ancestor in the UK otherwise evolution would have an issue explaining it.
There is more, much more, what shocks me though is that whilst you will not accept that evolution has met its burden of proof you require NO verifiable proof for God.
Do you have evidence to back that up, any statistics?
Protect the personal theological commitment at all costs!Well that's my point, nothing of substance or value is ever said by creationists. Instead, all we get is 'i believe my bible to be literally true, therefore whatever facts you may think you have are subservient to my interpretation of the bible.'
This is basically a five year old telling a cardiothoracic surgeon he's doing it wrong because he watched an episode of Scrubs. Creationists never put in the time it takes to fully understand the theory - and I mean really understand. All we ever get is regurgitated PRATT's from the 3 or 4 creo sites out there.
Perhaps.....Therefore, 96.8 percent of the members of the National Academy of Sciences are fools.
There is no qualitative difference. Maybe that's what confused you about our responses.only thing is that when talking to evolutionists it is important to explain what you mean by that because they are not able to understand the difference between what is commonly referred to as macro and micro evolution.
SAAB no longer makes cars,
Well if SAAB make cars how come there are still aeroplanes?
SAAB 9,3 is still produced in China.
i just use evolutionery logic. if according to evolution small steps+time= big step. then small steps in a car (something that we can observe like a rust or color change because the sun)+time= airplane. the same logic, the same (wrong) conclusion. actually, even if we assume that we have a car that is able to reproduce like a living thing, it will not evolve into an airplane even by a trillion years.only thing is that when talking to evolutionists it is important to explain what you mean by that because they are not able to understand the difference between what is commonly referred to as macro and micro evolution.
As far as I know, yes. I don't know what creationists believe about him.Was Lazarus an ordinary human man?
Not possible to determine at this remove. It was a miracle, is all we know. Whether miracles always require the suspension of natural laws is unknown. No doubt you creationists have a detailed answer to that question and I'll go straight to hell if I don't agree with it.Did his resurrection conform to or violate natural law?
Natural law, as a creation of His, would be subservient to Him. But that's just my opinion, and that of my Sunday Morning Christ-denying Bible Haters club. I have seen creationists like you argue in this very forum that unless God's will is bound by two-value propositional logic He cannot exist.Is natural law superior or subservient to the Creator?
You mean like a crocoduck?only thing is that when talking to evolutionists it is important to explain what you mean by that because they are not able to understand the difference between what is commonly referred to as macro and micro evolution.
In one sense there is a whole universe of evidence. Unfortunately, alternative interpretations exist that are generally more plausible and subject to testing. Such tests have progressively supported those alternative interpretations.God has provided abundant evidence.
1. It is not claimed that the Universe came from nothing, so this is irrelevant.(I'm sure you've been told that before, so I am puzzled that you would bring it up again.)Even the Godless must admit that that everything could not come from nothing;
That depends, in part, upon how you define creation.Even the Godless must admit that that . . . . that there had to be some form of creation which no theory of science can identify.
I remember that there is no archaeological or independent historical evidence for the exodus from Egypt. I remember that dozens, scores, perhaps hundreds of other religions have stories of how their Gods triumphed over others.You forget how God proved Himself over the false gods of Egypt and others.
Of course I do. Respect for reality demands it. If I do not consider my own spiritual experiences or eye witness observations reliable, why on Earth would I ever contemplate taking seriously those of others. That would be just silly.You ignore the personal testimony of millions who have known the presence of God and who have experienced His miracles.
No, I'm the one who says, "It's seems very dark. Why is that? Perhaps my eyes are closed. Perhaps I am in a room without windows , or the windows are shuttered, perhaps there is a total eclipse in progress, perhaps I have gone blind, perhaps it is night, etc. Let me investigate and determine the facts of the matter, enquiring of others if I require any hypothesis to be independently validated."You are as one who binds his eyes in the daylight and proclaims it to be night.
Don’t you mean a desperate attempt by creos to say that evolution does not happen?ah...it's a concept...a theory...an explanation of how we get from speciation to what we see today....you know the THEORY OF EVOLUTION vs. evolution...wait..I thought you all were educated on the theory of evolution and you don't know what it is? How is that possible?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?