• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Reformationist

Non nobis domine sed tuo nomine da gloriam
Mar 7, 2002
14,273
465
52
✟44,595.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Michelle, what is the point of these latest posts of yours? Is it just your attempt to show the validity of baptizing babies and that Calvin agreed with the practice? If so, was there someone who said that he didn't?
 
Upvote 0

Reformationist

Non nobis domine sed tuo nomine da gloriam
Mar 7, 2002
14,273
465
52
✟44,595.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
No Christian tradition teaches that... you present a false premise, a bogus dilemma.

If you'd stop looking for an argument every time you post you'd realize that it wasn't me that said Calvin believe any such thing. It was Yeznik.
 
Upvote 0

Reformationist

Non nobis domine sed tuo nomine da gloriam
Mar 7, 2002
14,273
465
52
✟44,595.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single

Wow. I wonder if you guys ever even consider context when you torture Scripture as you do. The passage in James speaks of justification before man. Paul speaks of justification before God. Seriously, this is stuff that you should learn early on in your study of Scripture.
 
Upvote 0

Reformationist

Non nobis domine sed tuo nomine da gloriam
Mar 7, 2002
14,273
465
52
✟44,595.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
that you don't really know your hero very well.

What does what you posted have anything to do with what I know about Calvin? I was already aware that Calvin endorsed paedobaptism.
 
Upvote 0
Y

Yeznik

Guest

So you believe in infant baptism?
 
Upvote 0

Benedicta00

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2003
28,512
838
Visit site
✟55,563.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
It is to show, like Luther, he viewed it as necessary. It is to show how far you all have, not only drifted away from the early Church but even the Reformers... it is to show, you don't even know what you are honoring when you say you "honor" these ppl.

It is to show that underneath it all, what you "honor" is sola scripture, that what these men did was put a bible in your hand and you are now the authority, the arbiter of "truth."

That is why y'all honor them, some honesty admitting that would be nice.
 
Upvote 0
Y

Yeznik

Guest

Actually this is the classical tangent argument Protestants are taught early on.
 
Upvote 0

Benedicta00

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2003
28,512
838
Visit site
✟55,563.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
paedobaptism.

what is that? Some made up reformed word for infant baptism?

Oh and it is also to show that every nuance and practice of the Christian faith is not going to be found in scripture... and that's okay... not even Calvin was naive to believe that it will.
 
Upvote 0

Benedicta00

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2003
28,512
838
Visit site
✟55,563.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
on who's authority do you speak?
 
Upvote 0

Benedicta00

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2003
28,512
838
Visit site
✟55,563.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
..
 
Upvote 0

Benedicta00

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2003
28,512
838
Visit site
✟55,563.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private

I wonder what Calvin would think of y'all today... "All baptism does is get you wet.."
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.