Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
On what verses is the RCC ideal that...
"And so the TITLE SAINT is reserved for those who we can know, by their exemplary holy life on earth, and by manifestations of their sanctity and holliness in heaven."
The Bible says no such thing, the RCC is not charged with appointing sainthood on anyone.
Symantics?
That in mind then, we are stating we recognise that these men were made as Saints by God.When the CC Canonizes a person as a Saint. It it simply stating that She recognizes that the person has been made a Saint by God and we know about it
There are Saints that we don't know about. That does not make them any less of a Saint. We just don't know that they are a Saint.
Their Sainthood is not dependent on the recognition of the CC.
Peace
That in mind then, we are stating we recognise that these men were made as Saints by God.
No harm No foul...You see these guys were incredibly important tools of God to help in our right understanding of Christianity! They are truly saints to US! That it offends some of you guys, SORRY!
And who says we have to examine them for such a title?
Did they life a virtous and heroic christian life? Did any one examine their lives and determine that God did indeed santified them in this life?
No they were most certainly not made Saints by God.
Peace
The JS of Christ? LR that's were your sitting? I didn't know that
No they were most certainly not made Saints by God.
Peace
They are not Saints. Plain and simple. And no one can prove that they are.The JS of Christ? LR that's were your sitting? I didn't know that
And who says we have to examine them for such a title?
Some would certainly say that they did, in fact, live heroic lives.....virtuous? Christ alone can claim that.
Says who? You whom think you can examine and judge who belongs to Christ? They were used mightly of God. They were indeed men of the faith just as Paul and Peter were.. It is not up to any denomination to recognize the saints.. Jesus said we shall know them.. By what? Their fruits. Not if they went to confession on a daily basis or partook of the Eucachrist. We can see in the scripture what the fruit of the Holy Spirit is.. We do not need men of any type to recongize and examine them..God does that Himself..
Did they life a virtous and heroic christian life? Did any one examine their lives and determine that God did indeed santified them in this life?
No they were most certainly not made Saints by God in this life.
Peace
Just another way to dismiss what we are saying. It is semantics to you, because you donlt want to believe us. but you're wrong. It is what we are telling you it is, it's not semantics.Symantics?
Says who? You whom think you can examine and judge who belongs to Christ? They were used mightly of God. They were indeed men of the faith just as Paul and Peter were.. It is not up to any denomination to recognize the saints.. Jesus said we shall know them.. By what? Their fruits. Not if they went to confession on a daily basis or partook of the Eucachrist. We can see in the scripture what the fruit of the Holy Spirit is.. We do not need men of any type to recongize and examine them..God does that Himself..
My point is that the RCC has a process for determining sainthood through a series of examinations...incorruptible etc...that has no biblical basis. At least, no one has shown me any and I haven't found it...which is why I asked for it a couple of times.Just another way to dismiss what we are saying. It is semantics to you, because you donlt want to believe us. but you're wrong. It is what we are telling you it is, it's not semantics.
Our salvation, our sainthood, has very little to do with what we do and basically everything to do with what He does.
My point is that the RCC has a process for determining sainthood through a series of examinations...incorruptible etc...that has no biblical basis. At least, no one has shown me any and I haven't found it...which is why I asked for it a couple of times.
If Stalin and Hitler repented and were saved before they died, then they are saints, just as any one else who has been called by God to be one....all who are saved are saints. Calvin and Luther and anyone else who have been Christs through the ages are, in fact, saints regardless of what the RCC says about them, no matter how much people want to slander them, and no matter how imperfect they were in their earthly lives.
Our salvation, our sainthood, has very little to do with what we do and basically everything to do with what He does.
Wrong.But the issue within Calvinism is that if Stalin and Hitler were created by God to destroy mankind, and basically they lived their lives according to what God made them for that would make them obedient to God’s Will, simply because they are doing what they were designed to do.
It must have been predestined that he can't understand predestinationWrong.
Obedience isn't an ingredient in predestination.
Even disobedience is predestined.
You turn sense into nonsense by trying to define disobedience as obedience.
You harbor definitions that prevent you from being able to concieve of predestination.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?