Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What irony. You ignore the 95% in order to accept the 5% that he rejects.Are you trying to argue that we are not deceived AV? Is that not the basis of your whole argument against the "5% of science" you disagree with?
You cannot blame the Creator for the way He chose to create. You can only blame yourself for your own delusion caused by the way you chose to interpret His creation. If God wanted to deceive us He wouldn't have left us a written record of what He did.That third option is actually my second option.. a deceptive creator. Because this "common designer" of yours had to have purposely created to make it look like common descent had occurred. He had to have created a false family tree.
Yup -- they have a zero tolerance level with us.What irony. You ignore the 95% in order to accept the 5% that he rejects.
Biblical Creation is irrefutable. This is why the debate has continued for so many centuries. But you are welcome to try.Some Reasons I Don't Believe in Biblical Creation
1. The overwhelming breadth of physical evidence supporting the theory of evolution as an accurate description of how all life came to be as it is today.
2. Aside from supernatural assertions put forth by ancient fractured theisms written down by men of antiquity, there is no compelling reason to believe that life forms were created magically from dust, clay, ribs, thought, etc.
3. The track record of these belief systems to be incorrect when making assertions about the natural world.
4. The pattern and process by which the proponents "teach" and argue for biblical creation as an accurate description of how all life came to be as it is today. It is an inherently flawed, inconsistent, and incapable of self correction.
Commence prattling please.
Biblical Creation is irrefutable. This is why the debate has continued for so many centuries. But you are welcome to try.
It just amazes me that they are willing to be a traitor to science because of their hatred of Christianity. Sooner or later everyone has to decide if they are going to take a stand for the truth or not. Perhaps science is just a tool they use to accomplish their anti Christian objectives. We know that God is long suffering not wanting any to perish but for all to come to a saving knowledge of the truth. Yet they accuse God because He will allow people to perish in their sin.Yup -- they have a zero tolerance level with us.
science is a far superior system for seeking knowledge.
It has been used time and again to dispel long held religious beliefs like the geocentric universe.
Evolution is just the modern incarnation of this age old cycle.
This pattern must be taken into account when looking at the big picture.
You can almost picture the process after being here after seeing responses like this time and time again...This quote starts off bad and just gets worse with each sentence.Biblical Creation is irrefutable. This is why the debate has continued for so many centuries. But you are welcome to try.
Is not. Has not. Already did.Biblical Creation is irrefutable. This is why the debate has continued for so many centuries. But you are welcome to try.
Just because we "invented" science doesn't preclude it from being a system for seeking knowledge. The scientific method was born out of the pursuit of knowledge. It is the most honest and accurate system we have for gaining knowledge. It stands in stark contrast to those who seek knowledge by interpreting ancient texts full of antiquated information.Science is not exactly a system for the seeking of knowledge, it is the seeking of knowledge. We invented the thing. Shheeesh...
I'm certain you were trying to say something here but It's gotten a bit muddled. The geocentric model was a long held belief of various religions based on their interpretation of the bible. It's been proven wrong by science and, after some effort by the church to suppress this contradictory knowledge, the heliocentric model was finally established by science and religion reinterpreted the ancient texts. It is a pattern that simply needs to repeat for the subject of evolution.If you want to call the geocentric literature of the scientific community "religious."
I guess you are not familiar with the debate at all are you. You should research the "wedge strategy". Let me google that for youYou mean a well known scientific community is resisting ID science because of it's "religious" literature?
Just because we "invented" science doesn't preclude it from being a system for seeking knowledge. The scientific method was born out of the pursuit of knowledge.
It is the most honest and accurate system we have for gaining knowledge. It stands in stark contrast to those who seek knowledge by interpreting ancient texts full of antiquated information.
I'm certain you were trying to say something here but It's gotten a bit muddled.
I guess you are not familiar with the debate at all are you. You should research the "wedge strategy". Let me google that for you
That must be why the fossil record does not support the instant creation of all basic "kinds" 6,100 years ago.For me a fossil is just like writting. Clearly God wanted to show us what He did and left us a fossil record so we could see for ourselves.
Why is it then that I see such little common sense among creationists here?Even if you deny the Bible, all of creation gives witness and testimony for God. Perhaps a few egg heads at the university say creation created itself. But the vast majority of people see that creation needed a Creator. That is why sometimes people believe the college of hard knocks trumps the universities. Because people tend to lose their common sense and the ability to think for themselves when they get to much education.
He left no record, except in the earth and our genes... and that is the record you guys ignore. Are you claiming that God didn't know the consequences of setting up our genetic sequence so that it looked like we were all related by common descent??You cannot blame the Creator for the way He chose to create. You can only blame yourself for your own delusion caused by the way you chose to interpret His creation. If God wanted to deceive us He wouldn't have left us a written record of what He did.
You are ridiculous. You ignore the actual record in the earth and in our bodies. Then you take a work of MAN and claim it is God's and hold it above God's work. I am not calling God a liar, I am calling the god you created a liar, since you created him as a liar.It is only people like you who completely ignore His record who then turn and accuse Him of being a liar. He thoroughly explained what He did, you completely ignore His explanation, and then you accused Him of being a liar. Ridiculous!
I am not the ridiculous one. There is a reason that there is a video series on YouTube called, "Why do people laugh at creationists."Perhaps if you took some time to study His explanation you wouldn't keep embarrassing yourself with such a ridiculous accusation.
You are entitled to your own opinions, but not to your own facts.
You realize that peeking through a keyhole is science, don't you?They actually do science?
What irony. You ignore the 95% in order to accept the 5% that he rejects.
Familiar. It's one scientific community opposing another.
Yes, you are being deceived -- but not by God.
1 John 1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?