• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Sola Scriptura - who has the correct interpretation of the WORD?

Status
Not open for further replies.

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,550
28,531
74
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,300.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
I believe the Church of Christ teaches "Sola Scriptura" the best.

Many other demonitations have twisted scriptures that they find "unreasonable." (i.e. baptism)
I have been to a few CoC services and I must admit, it is a far cry from the Pentcostal/charismatic services. Another words, no instruments or music.
Btw, what are their views on the Amill Doctrine? Just curious. Peace

http://www.gotquestions.org/amillennialism.html

According to Amillennialism, the millennium of Revelation 20:1–6 is being fulfilled spiritually in the present age before the return of Jesus Christ. Thus, the millennium or kingdom of Christ is in existence now. Amillennialists affirm that the millennium began with the resurrection and/or ascension of Christ and will be consummated when Jesus returns again to establish the Eternal Kingdom that is discussed in Revelation 21–22.
 
Upvote 0

thereselittleflower

Well-Known Member
Nov 9, 2003
34,832
1,526
✟57,855.00
Faith
Catholic
JacktheCatholic said:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Melethiel
If you have nothing to do but make wisecracks, kindly leave.​

I do not want any wisecracks either. I do not think TLF was doing that.

Thank you Jack for understanding and speaking words of wisdom below.


I am very interested in your question and seeing a direct answer given to it.

Posting is a touchy business sometimes because we can not see each others faces or hear each others tones or see the body language. I heard that what we say is only 40% of how we communicate.

I think it is more like 10-20% of what we say

Excellent points.
 
Reactions: sunlover1
Upvote 0

thereselittleflower

Well-Known Member
Nov 9, 2003
34,832
1,526
✟57,855.00
Faith
Catholic
What does this have to do with the topic of this thread?
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,550
28,531
74
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,300.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
That should be interesting.

1 Corin 7:26 I am lawlizing then this, ideal to be belonging because of the being present distress, that ideal to a man thus to be: 27 You been bound to a wife? No be seeking to be loosed!. Thou hast been loosed from a wife? No be seeking a wife.

Romans 13:11 And this knowing the time, that hour it-is already out of sleep to be roused, for now is-near/egguteron <1452> of us the Salvation than when we believed.
12 The Night progresses, the yet Day has-neared/hggiken <1448> (5758). We should be putting off then the works of the Darkness, we should be putting on the implements of the Light.
 
Upvote 0

sunlover1

Beloved, Let us love one another
Nov 10, 2006
26,146
5,348
Under the Shadow of the Almighty
✟102,311.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
You question seems very clear to me Jack. I am wondering why no one has yet answered it.....
It was a great question.
I answered it on the second page.

 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,550
28,531
74
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,300.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
As TLF writely pointed out before, God allowed even an ass to be guided by the HS.
Why not regenrate CHRISTians in the scripture interpretations?
Are you trying to imply something here?
 
Upvote 0

Melethiel

Miserere mei, Domine
Site Supporter
Jun 8, 2005
27,287
940
35
Ohio
✟99,593.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
We primarily go by the Lutheran Confessions.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,263
✟584,002.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
This brings to mind Paul’s oral instructions on the Eucharist [1 Cor 11:34]

Paul says there that he'll discuss "other things."

To make that ("other things") into a giant loophole by which to create all manner of new doctrines is not right. It's certainly not fair to Paul.
 
Upvote 0

JacktheCatholic

Praise be to Jesus Christ. Now and forever.
Mar 9, 2007
24,545
2,797
57
Michigan, USA
Visit site
✟51,888.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I believe the Church of Christ teaches "Sola Scriptura" the best.

Many other demonitations have twisted scriptures that they find "unreasonable." (i.e. baptism)

Please elaborate.
 
Upvote 0

JacktheCatholic

Praise be to Jesus Christ. Now and forever.
Mar 9, 2007
24,545
2,797
57
Michigan, USA
Visit site
✟51,888.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
SO when do you actually want to discuss the Scriptures?

Start another thread.

I think I need to keep my beliefs to myself in this thread since it is for those that teach Sola Scriptura. Just trying to stay on topic.
 
Upvote 0

squint

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2007
16,182
903
Mountain Regions
✟20,405.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

"Write what you see..."

A "doer" of Word does Word
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,550
28,531
74
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,300.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Start another thread.

I think I need to keep my beliefs to myself in this thread since it is for those that teach Sola Scriptura. Just trying to stay on topic.
Do you have some views that may go against the RC denomination's views? Just curious
 
Upvote 0

JacktheCatholic

Praise be to Jesus Christ. Now and forever.
Mar 9, 2007
24,545
2,797
57
Michigan, USA
Visit site
✟51,888.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Paul says there that he'll discuss "other things."

To make that ("other things") into a giant loophole by which to create all manner of new doctrines is not right. It's certainly not fair to Paul.

In this thread it is your teachings that should be heard.

Those that teach Sola Scriptura.

I have seen a Lutheran give some counsel.
I have seen a CoC give counsel.

Even Simon said something...


I hope to read more.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,263
✟584,002.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
In this thread it is your teachings that should be heard.

Those that teach Sola Scriptura.

I have seen a Lutheran give some counsel.
I have seen a CoC give counsel.

Even Simon said something...


I hope to read more.

I appreciate that. However, the misrepresentation of a Bible verse like that should not be let pass without setting the record straight. Anyone could have done it. I merely read and replied first. No discussion, just pointing out what it actually says. Now we move on.

As for my commentary on SS, it's cleancut. We all agree that the Bible is divine revelation, don't we? Then all that we on the SS side are saying is, it's of unimpeachable authority. Also, God must have meant it to be sufficient for us or else he'd have added more to it. How can either of those propositions be denied?

To second-guess the sufficiency of the Word of God, and claim that we have to have this or that human's ideas bolted onto the Word of God does not make sense to me. If there were a reason, I'd hear it and listern carefully. But, I was a Roman Catholic, you know, and it was because there is nothing more sufficient or accurate than the Word of God that I rejected Tradition, the commentary and ideas of ordinary men.

The Church doesn't even adhere to its own definition of what supposedly makes Tradition a second stream of divine revelation, so it clearly (IMO) is false, and scripture is all we have to count on. Besides, the Bible itself says that it contains all that we need to know, so what argument can there be for adding anything to it?

I hope that's something along the lines of what you were asking me to contribute.
 
Upvote 0

JacktheCatholic

Praise be to Jesus Christ. Now and forever.
Mar 9, 2007
24,545
2,797
57
Michigan, USA
Visit site
✟51,888.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Thanks Albion.

I had mentioned some scripture ealrier and asked how it should be interpretated as a way to get things going.

Would you care to comment?

For example which interpretation of "This is My Body" is correct?

[bible]matthew 26:26[/bible]


Is it symbolic or literal or poetic or ...
 
Upvote 0

JacktheCatholic

Praise be to Jesus Christ. Now and forever.
Mar 9, 2007
24,545
2,797
57
Michigan, USA
Visit site
✟51,888.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,550
28,531
74
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,300.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,263
✟584,002.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Thanks Albion.

I had mentioned some scripture ealrier and asked how it should be interpretated as a way to get things going.

Would you care to comment?

The answer does not lie exclusively in the words of institution (This my body, etc) although that's the way most of these debates go. It's also in what he says afterwards about the meal and the Apostles repeating it after he's gone from Earth.

Because that wording suggests a transcendent meaning, the bread and wine appear to mean more than just symbols, not even symbols which call valuable memories to mind when the Eucharist is celebrated, or bond the communicants together. In addition, there is evidence from very early times that the first Christians saw the meal as more than just a symbol.

Therefore, we believe that in some way, it is Christ's person. But at the same time, we have no reason to think that it is LITERALLY parts of that same body he used on Earth, and we know that this idea didn't come into play until well into the Middle Ages. Transubstantiation is purely and completely a theory out of the Medieval mindset, as well as being dated from the Middle Ages, not the Apostolic period.

I'm answering to the question you asked, Jack, but I don't see how it relates to Sola Scriptura. Sola Scriptura is not a way of interpreting. It is a commitment to what it is that we trust. Then comes the interpretation once we know what to interpret.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.